IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usdami/333547.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

United Kingdom Agricultural Production and Trade Policy Post-Brexit

Author

Listed:
  • Jelliffe, Jeremy
  • Gerval, Adam
  • Husby, Megan
  • Jarrell, Philip
  • Williams, Brian

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) is an important regional agricultural producer with historical prominence in the global agri-food trade. Agriculture covers more than two-thirds of UK land, and top agricultural goods produced include animal products (beef, pork, lamb, poultry, and dairy) and grain (wheat, barley, and oats). Agri-food represents the largest manufacturing sector in the UK, which is known for specialty products. Over recent decades, the UK’s membership in the European Union (EU) mostly defined the country’s agri-food production and trade policies. After leaving the EU through Brexit, the UK is responsible for constructing agricultural policy and negotiating trade agreements. This report explores trends in UK agricultural production and trade and considers the historical UK-EU coupling and potential shifts in agri-food trade patterns post-Brexit.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelliffe, Jeremy & Gerval, Adam & Husby, Megan & Jarrell, Philip & Williams, Brian, 2023. "United Kingdom Agricultural Production and Trade Policy Post-Brexit," USDA Miscellaneous 333547, United States Department of Agriculture.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:333547
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333547/files/eib-250.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.333547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oluwaseun Mercy Ojo & Carmen Hubbard & Michael Wallace & Andrew Moxey & Myles Patton & David Harvey & Shailesh Shrestha & Siyi Feng & Charles Scott & George Philippidis & John Davis & Anne Liddon, 2021. "Brexit: potential impacts on the economic welfare of UK farm households," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(9), pages 1583-1595, September.
    2. Angela Cheptea & Marilyne Huchet & Lucile Henry, 2021. "How will Brexit affect the patterns of European agricultural and food exports? [Estimating general equilibrium trade policy effects: GE PPML]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(5), pages 1031-1073.
    3. Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Jelliffe, Jeremy L & Baquedano, Felix G & Scott, Sara G, 2020. "Economic and Food Security Impacts of Agricultural Input Reduction Under the European Union Green Deal’s Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies," Economic Brief 327231, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Morgan, Stephen & Arita, Shawn & Beckman, Jayson & Ahsan, Saquib & Russell, Dylan & Jarrell, Philip & Kenner, Bart, 2022. "The Economic Impacts of Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Agriculture," USDA Miscellaneous 316892, United States Department of Agriculture.
    5. Colin Thirtle & Jenifer Piesse & David Schimmelpfennig, 2008. "Modeling the length and shape of the R&D lag: an application to UK agricultural productivity," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(1), pages 73-85, July.
    6. Arita, Shawn & Mitchell, Lorraine & Beckman, Jayson, 2015. "Estimating the Effects of Selected Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Technical Barriers to Trade on U.S.-EU Agricultural Trade," Economic Research Report 212887, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Dieter Helm, 2017. "Agriculture after Brexit," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(suppl_1), pages 124-133.
    8. Freeman, Rebecca & Manova, Kalina & Prayer, Thomas & Sampson, Thomas, 2022. "UK trade in the wake of Brexit," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117855, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Rafal Kierzenkowski & Nigel Pain & Elena Rusticelli & Sanne Zwart, 2016. "The Economic Consequences of Brexit: A Taxing Decision," OECD Economic Policy Papers 16, OECD Publishing.
    10. Beckman, Jayson & Gale, Fred & Lee, Tani, 2021. "Agricultural Market Access Under Tariff-Rate Quotas," Economic Research Report 327203, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Jean Christophe Bureau & Jesús Antón, 2022. "Agricultural Total Factor Productivity and the environment: A guide to emerging best practices in measurement," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 177, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalogiannidis, Stavros & Syndoukas, Dimitrios, 2024. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services on Farm Output: A Worldwide Viewpoint," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(1), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hylke Vandenbussche & William Connell & Wouter Simons, 2022. "Global value chains, trade shocks and jobs: An application to Brexit," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 2338-2369, August.
    2. Baker, Jessica & Carreras, Oriol & Kirby, Simon & Meaning, Jack & Piggott, Rebecca, 2016. "Modelling events: The short-term economic impact of leaving the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 339-350.
    3. Patrick Bisciari, 2019. "A survey of the long-term impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU27 economies," Working Paper Research 366, National Bank of Belgium.
    4. Minjeong Kim & Changki Shim & Jaehyeong Lee & Choeki Wangchuk, 2022. "Hot Water Treatment as Seed Disinfection Techniques for Organic and Eco-Friendly Environmental Agricultural Crop Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Davide Dell’Unto & Gabriele Dono & Raffaele Cortignani, 2023. "Impacts of Environmental Targets on the Livestock Sector: An Assessment Tool Applied to Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Jayson Beckman & Noé J. Nava & Angelica S. Williams & Steven Zahniser, 2024. "Land competition and welfare effects from Mexico's proposal to ban genetically engineered corn," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1300-1325, May.
    8. Jana Lososová & Radek Zdeněk, 2023. "Simulation of the impacts of the proposed direct payment scheme - The case of the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 13-24.
    9. Gale, Fred, 2021. "Potential Wheat Demand in China: Applicants for Import Quota," Economic Research Report 327188, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. George Cusworth & Jennifer Dodsworth, 2021. "Using the ‘good farmer’ concept to explore agricultural attitudes to the provision of public goods. A case study of participants in an English agri-environment scheme," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 929-941, December.
    11. Cororaton, Caesar B. & Orden, David, 2016. "Potential Economic Effects of the Reduction in Agricultural and Nonagricultural Trade Barriers in the Transatlantic and Investment Partnership," Proceedings Issues, 2016: Climate Change and International Agricultural Trade in the Aftermath of COP21, December 11-13, 2016, Scottsdale, Arizona 252425, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    12. Arega D. Alene, 2010. "Productivity growth and the effects of R&D in African agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(3‐4), pages 223-238, May.
    13. Anna Lungarska & Thierry Brunelle & Raja Chakir & Pierre‐Alain Jayet & Rémi Prudhomme & Stéphane De Cara & Jean‐Christophe Bureau, 2023. "Halving mineral nitrogen use in European agriculture: Insights from multi‐scale land‐use models," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1529-1550, September.
    14. Jayson Beckman & Maros Ivanic & Jeremy Jelliffe, 2022. "Market impacts of Farm to Fork: Reducing agricultural input usage," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1995-2013, December.
    15. Swati Dhingra & Rebecca Freeman & Hanwei Huang, 2023. "The Impact of Non‐tariff Barriers on Trade and Welfare," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(357), pages 140-177, January.
    16. Welfens Paul J.J. & Baier Fabian & Kadiric Samir & Korus Arthur & Xiong Tian, 2019. "EU28 Capital Market Perspectives of a Hard BREXIT: Theory, Empirical Findings and Policy Options," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Iain Begg, 2016. "Brexit: Why, What Next and How?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(1), pages 30-36, August.
    18. Bo Xiong & John C. Beghin, 2018. "TTIP and agricultural trade: The case of tariff elimination and pesticide policy cooperation," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 495-508, June.
    19. Maros Ivanic & Jayson Beckman & Noe Nava, 2023. "Estimation of the Value-Added/Intermediate Input Substitution Elasticities Consistent with the GTAP Data," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 8(2), pages 134-158, December.
    20. László Békési & Zsolt Kovalszky & Tímea Várnai, 2017. "Scenarios for potential macroeconomic impact of Brexit on Hungary," MNB Occasional Papers 2017/125, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; International Relations/Trade; Political Economy; Public Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:333547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usda.gov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.