IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1332-1340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Qirong Chen
  • Dan Liu
  • Chuyi Zhou
  • Siyuan Tang

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To explore the relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses. Background The development of the nursing discipline and evidence‐based practice calls for research competence and critical thinking disposition among clinical nurses. The verification of the relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence could make contributions to promoting related knowledge building and providing practical implications for nurses, nurse educators and nurse managers. However, there is a lack of evidence exploring the relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence in clinical nurses. Design A cross‐sectional study. Methods A total of 156 clinical nurses from two tertiary hospitals participated in this study. The Chinese Version of Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory and Research Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses were used to measure critical thinking disposition and nursing research competence, respectively. Data were collected in September 2017. Descriptive statistics, bivariate correlation and linear regression were used to analyse data. The STROBE checklist was used in reporting this study. Results The clinical nurses surveyed showed a positive inclination to general critical thinking but reported an overall low level of nursing research competence. A moderate degree of positive correlation was found between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses. Educational degree was also found as an influencing factor of nursing research competence of clinical nurses. Conclusion The critical thinking disposition of clinical nurses is positively related to their research competence. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses with a passion for nursing research should pay attention to improving their critical thinking dispositions. Nurse educators and managers should provide better learning, working and research environments and more supports to cultivate critical thinking disposition and improve nursing research competence in nursing research education and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1332-1340
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise O’Byrne & Sheree Smith, 2011. "Models to enhance research capacity and capability in clinical nurses: a narrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1365-1371, May.
    2. Sigrid Wangensteen & Inger S Johansson & Monica E Björkström & Gun Nordström, 2011. "Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: predictors for research use. A quantitative cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2436-2447, September.
    3. Mei Jen Chang & Ying‐Ju Chang & Shih‐Hsien Kuo & Yi‐Hsin Yang & Fan‐Hao Chou, 2011. "Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3224-3232, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young-Rim Choi & Ye-Na Lee & Dayeong Kim & Won Hee Park & Dai Young Kwon & Sung Ok Chang, 2022. "An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Sylvie Robichaud‐Ekstrand, 2016. "New Brunswick nurses' views on nursing research, and factors influencing their research activities in clinical practice," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 246-255, June.
    3. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Karen Lyng Larsen & Gitte Nielsen & Britt Laugesen, 2020. "Exploring nursing students’ use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1968-1980, June.
    4. Daphne SK Lee & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Pathmawathi Subramanian & Robert Thomas Bachmann & Swee Leong Ong, 2017. "An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4065-4079, December.
    5. Shwu‐Ru Liou & Hsiu‐Chen Liu & Shu‐Ling Tsai & Tsui‐Ping Chu & Ching‐Yu Cheng, 2020. "Performance competence of pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses: A comparison study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2652-2662, July.
    6. Lona Roll & Kristin Stegenga & Verna Hendricks-Ferguson & Yvonne J. Barnes & Brooke Cherven & Sharron L. Docherty & Sheri L. Robb & Joan E. Haase, 2013. "Engaging Nurses in Research for a Randomized Clinical Trial of a Behavioral Health Intervention," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-6, September.
    7. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Britt Laugesen & Iben Bøgh Bahnsen & Lone Jørgensen & Ingrid Maria Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Integrating the fundamentals of care framework in baccalaureate nursing education: An example from a nursing school in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2506-2515, June.
    8. Karen Missen & Lisa McKenna & Alison Beauchamp & Jo‐Ann Larkins, 2016. "Qualified nurses' rate new nursing graduates as lacking skills in key clinical areas," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2134-2143, August.
    9. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D. Sheferaw & Tegbar Yigzaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2020. "Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    10. Catharina J. van Oostveen & Nicole S. Goedhart & Anneke L. Francke & Hester Vermeulen, 2017. "Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospita," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4973-4984, December.
    11. Natalie Bradford & Shirley Chambers & Adrienne Hudson & Jacqui Jauncey‐Cooke & Robyn Penny & Carol Windsor & Patsy Yates, 2019. "Evaluation frameworks in health services: An integrative review of use, attributes and elements," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2486-2498, July.
    12. Hung-Chang Liao & Ya-huei Wang, 2020. "Integrating the Gender Perspective into Literature Studies to Enhance Medical University Students’ Gender Awareness and Critical Thinking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Ichsan Rizany & Rr. Tutik Sri Hariyati & Efy Afifah & Rusdiyansyah, 2019. "The Impact of Nurse Scheduling Management on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Army Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    14. Yen-Chiao Angel Lu & Shu-Hsin Lee & Ming-Yi Hsu & Fen-Fen Shih & Wen-Jiuan Yen & Cheng-Yi Huang & Pei-Ching Li & Ching-Yen Hung & Hsiao-Ling Chuang & Ching-Pyng Kuo, 2022. "Effects of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Self-Evaluation of Their Core Competencies: A Longitudinal Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Arja Häggman‐Laitila & Lea‐Riitta Mattila & Hanna‐Leena Melender, 2017. "A systematic review of the outcomes of educational interventions relevant to nurses with simultaneous strategies for guideline implementation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 320-340, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1332-1340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.