IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i11-12p1968-1980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring nursing students’ use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work

Author

Listed:
  • Siri Lygum Voldbjerg
  • Karen Lyng Larsen
  • Gitte Nielsen
  • Britt Laugesen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how nursing students perceive and use the conceptual Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work in nursing education and furthermore to describe influencing factors on perceptions and use of the framework. Background The Fundamentals of Care framework has been integrated in core courses in two Schools of Nursing in Region North Denmark in response to studies reporting that nursing students and newly graduated nurses lack the knowledge, skills and competencies to meet the challenges of delivering fundamental care in clinical practice. An integration of the framework in case‐based work in nursing education has not previously been studied. Design and methods The study design was focused ethnography. Data were collected using participant observations, focus group interviews and individual interviews. Four groups of four to five nursing students participating in case‐based work sessions and three faculty members from two Schools of Nursing were included. The study adhered to COREQ. Results The results show an uncertainty among the students about how to understand and use the conceptual framework in case‐based work. The uncertainties derive from diversities in faculty members’ perceptions and curricular planning among others. However, the framework appears to support the students’ learning about what nursing is and requires. Conclusions The study indicates that integrating Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work may be one way of teaching nursing students the complexities of integrated fundamental nursing care. However, there is a need to consider how to support students in articulating Fundamentals of Care, and to draw attention to the influence of role models and curricular planning. Relevance to educational practice The study provides knowledge relevant when customising future educational interventions regarding the integration of Fundamentals of Care in nursing education and may provide valuable knowledge of evaluation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Karen Lyng Larsen & Gitte Nielsen & Britt Laugesen, 2020. "Exploring nursing students’ use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1968-1980, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:11-12:p:1968-1980
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsten Jack & Claire Hamshire & Alison Chambers, 2017. "The influence of role models in undergraduate nurse education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4707-4715, December.
    2. Sigrid Wangensteen & Inger S Johansson & Monica E Björkström & Gun Nordström, 2011. "Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: predictors for research use. A quantitative cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2436-2447, September.
    3. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Mette Grønkjær & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in clinical decision‐making: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1313-1327, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trundle, Catherine & Phillips, Tarryn, 2023. "Defining focused ethnography: Disciplinary boundary-work and the imagined divisions between ‘focused’ and ‘traditional’ ethnography in health research – A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Britt Laugesen & Iben Bøgh Bahnsen & Lone Jørgensen & Ingrid Maria Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Integrating the fundamentals of care framework in baccalaureate nursing education: An example from a nursing school in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2506-2515, June.
    2. Trundle, Catherine & Phillips, Tarryn, 2023. "Defining focused ethnography: Disciplinary boundary-work and the imagined divisions between ‘focused’ and ‘traditional’ ethnography in health research – A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    3. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær, 2021. "Newly graduated nurses’ socialisation resulting in limiting inquiry and one‐sided use of knowledge sources—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 701-711, March.
    4. Gina Maiocco & Lya M. Stroupe & Anthea Rhoades & Billie Vance, 2019. "Care of veterans in a non‐veteran health administration hospital: What is the status of nursing practice after continuing education?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 520-527, February.
    5. Catharina J. van Oostveen & Nicole S. Goedhart & Anneke L. Francke & Hester Vermeulen, 2017. "Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospita," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4973-4984, December.
    6. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    7. Kirsten Jack & Claire Hamshire & W. Edwin Harris & Mark Langan & Neil Barrett & Christopher Wibberley, 2018. "“My mentor didn't speak to me for the first four weeks”: Perceived Unfairness experienced by nursing students in clinical practice settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 929-938, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:11-12:p:1968-1980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.