IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i21-22p3224-3232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Mei Jen Chang
  • Ying‐Ju Chang
  • Shih‐Hsien Kuo
  • Yi‐Hsin Yang
  • Fan‐Hao Chou

Abstract

Aim and objective. To examine the relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses. Background. There are few evidance‐based data related to the relationship between critical thinking ability and nursing competence of clinical nurses. Design. A cross‐sectional and correlation research design was used. Methods. A total of 570 clinical nurses at a medical centre in southern Taiwan were recruited into this study. Two self‐report questionnaires, the Watson‐Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) and the Nursing Competence Scale (NCS), were used to collect data. Results. The critical thinking ability of clinical nurses was at the middle level. The highest score for the subscales of the WGCTA was ‘interpretation ability’ and the lowest was ‘inference ability’. The nursing competence of clinical nurses was at the middle level and above. The highest score for the subscales was ‘caring ability’ and the lowest was ‘research ability’. Critical thinking ability had a significantly positive correlation with nursing competence. Critical thinking, working years, educational levels and position/title were the significant predictors of nursing competence, accounting for 32·9% of the variance. Conclusions. Critical thinking ability had a significantly positive correlation with nursing competence. The critical thinking ability of clinical nurses with a master’s degree was significantly better than those with a bachelor’s degree or a diploma and nurses with over five working years was significantly better than those with under five years. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings of this study can further serve as a reference for nursing education to improve nursing curricula and teaching strategies for nurse preparation. It could also be a guideline for nursing administration personnel in on‐the‐job training and orientation programs for nursing staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei Jen Chang & Ying‐Ju Chang & Shih‐Hsien Kuo & Yi‐Hsin Yang & Fan‐Hao Chou, 2011. "Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3224-3232, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:3224-3232
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03593.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03593.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03593.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D. Sheferaw & Tegbar Yigzaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2020. "Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Shwu‐Ru Liou & Hsiu‐Chen Liu & Shu‐Ling Tsai & Tsui‐Ping Chu & Ching‐Yu Cheng, 2020. "Performance competence of pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses: A comparison study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2652-2662, July.
    3. Ichsan Rizany & Rr. Tutik Sri Hariyati & Efy Afifah & Rusdiyansyah, 2019. "The Impact of Nurse Scheduling Management on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Army Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    4. Yen-Chiao Angel Lu & Shu-Hsin Lee & Ming-Yi Hsu & Fen-Fen Shih & Wen-Jiuan Yen & Cheng-Yi Huang & Pei-Ching Li & Ching-Yen Hung & Hsiao-Ling Chuang & Ching-Pyng Kuo, 2022. "Effects of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Self-Evaluation of Their Core Competencies: A Longitudinal Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Young-Rim Choi & Ye-Na Lee & Dayeong Kim & Won Hee Park & Dai Young Kwon & Sung Ok Chang, 2022. "An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    7. Karen Missen & Lisa McKenna & Alison Beauchamp & Jo‐Ann Larkins, 2016. "Qualified nurses' rate new nursing graduates as lacking skills in key clinical areas," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2134-2143, August.
    8. Daphne SK Lee & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Pathmawathi Subramanian & Robert Thomas Bachmann & Swee Leong Ong, 2017. "An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4065-4079, December.
    9. Hung-Chang Liao & Ya-huei Wang, 2020. "Integrating the Gender Perspective into Literature Studies to Enhance Medical University Students’ Gender Awareness and Critical Thinking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:3224-3232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.