IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4973-4984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Catharina J. van Oostveen
  • Nicole S. Goedhart
  • Anneke L. Francke
  • Hester Vermeulen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To obtain in‐depth insight into the perceptions of nurse academics and other stakeholders regarding the importance, facilitators and barriers for nurses combining clinical and academic work in university hospitals. Background Combining clinical practice and academic work facilitates the use of research findings for high‐quality patient care. However, nurse academics move away from the bedside because clinical academic careers for nurses have not yet been established in the Netherlands. Methods This qualitative study was conducted in two Dutch university hospitals and their affiliated medical faculties and universities of applied sciences. Data were collected between May 2015 and August 2016. We used purposive sampling for 24 interviews. We asked 14 participants in two focus groups for their perceptions of importance, facilitators and barriers in nurses’ combined clinical and academic work in education and research. We audiotaped, transcribed and thematically analysed the interviews and focus groups. Results Three themes related to perceived importance, facilitators and barriers: culture, leadership and infrastructure. These themes represent deficiencies in facilitating clinical academic careers for nurses. The current nursing culture emphasises direct patient care, which is perceived as an academic misfit. Leadership is lacking at all levels, resulting in the underuse of nurse academics and the absence of supporting structures for nurses who combine clinical and academic work. Conclusions The present nursing culture appears to be the root cause of the dearth of academic positions and established clinical academic posts. Relevance to clinical practice A culture change would require a show of leadership that would promote and enable combined research, teaching and clinical practice and that would introduce clinical academic career pathways for nurses. Meanwhile, nurse academics should collaborate with established medical academics for whom combined roles are mainstream, and they should take advantage of their established infrastructure for success.

Suggested Citation

  • Catharina J. van Oostveen & Nicole S. Goedhart & Anneke L. Francke & Hester Vermeulen, 2017. "Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospita," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4973-4984, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4973-4984
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13996
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Al‐Nawafleh & Ruqayya S. Zeilani & Catrin Evans, 2013. "After the Doctorate: A qualitative study investigating nursing research career development in Jordan," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 423-429, December.
    2. Sigrid Wangensteen & Inger S Johansson & Monica E Björkström & Gun Nordström, 2011. "Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: predictors for research use. A quantitative cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2436-2447, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julia van Kraaij & Catharina van Oostveen & Hester Vermeulen & Maud Heinen & Anita Huis & Marian Adriaansen & Jeroen Peters, 2020. "Nurse practitioners’ perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 447-458, February.
    2. Eva F. Maassen & Eline J. Regeer & Joske F.G. Bunders & Ralph W. Kupka & Barbara J. Regeer, 2019. "Research Needs for Bipolar Disorder From Clinicians’ Perspectives: Narrowing the Research–Practice Gap," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Karen Lyng Larsen & Gitte Nielsen & Britt Laugesen, 2020. "Exploring nursing students’ use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1968-1980, June.
    2. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Britt Laugesen & Iben Bøgh Bahnsen & Lone Jørgensen & Ingrid Maria Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Integrating the fundamentals of care framework in baccalaureate nursing education: An example from a nursing school in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2506-2515, June.
    3. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4973-4984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.