IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2682-d345226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students

Author

Listed:
  • Rena Bakker

    (Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Ephrem D. Sheferaw

    (Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Tegbar Yigzaw

    (Jhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

  • Jelle Stekelenburg

    (Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands)

  • Marlou L. A. de Kroon

    (Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The maternal mortality ratio and neonatal mortality rate remain high in Ethiopia, where few births are attended by qualified healthcare staff. This is partly due to care providers’ mistreatment of women during childbirth, which creates a culture of anxiety that decreases the use of healthcare services. This study employed a cross-sectional design to identify risk factors for positive appraisal of mistreatment during childbirth. We asked 391 Ethiopian final year midwifery students to complete a paper-and-pen questionnaire assessing background characteristics, prior observation of mistreatment during education, self-esteem, stress, and mistreatment appraisal. A multivariable linear regression analysis indicated age ( p = 0.005), stress ( p = 0.019), and previous observation of mistreatment during education ( p < 0.001) to be significantly associated with mistreatment appraisal. Younger students, stressed students, and students that had observed more mistreatment during their education reported more positive mistreatment appraisal. No significant association was observed for origin ( p = 0.373) and self-esteem ( p = 0.445). Findings can be utilized to develop educational interventions that counteract mistreatment during childbirth in the Ethiopian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Rena Bakker & Ephrem D. Sheferaw & Tegbar Yigzaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2020. "Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2682-:d:345226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei Jen Chang & Ying‐Ju Chang & Shih‐Hsien Kuo & Yi‐Hsin Yang & Fan‐Hao Chou, 2011. "Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3224-3232, November.
    2. Alex Filby & Fran McConville & Anayda Portela, 2016. "What Prevents Quality Midwifery Care? A Systematic Mapping of Barriers in Low and Middle Income Countries from the Provider Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Meghan A Bohren & Joshua P Vogel & Erin C Hunter & Olha Lutsiv & Suprita K Makh & João Paulo Souza & Carolina Aguiar & Fernando Saraiva Coneglian & Alex Luíz Araújo Diniz & Özge Tunçalp & Dena Javadi , 2015. "The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D Sheferaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Tegbar Yigzaw & Marlou L A de Kroon, 2020. "Development and use of a scale to assess gender differences in appraisal of mistreatment during childbirth among Ethiopian midwifery students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Desirée Mena-Tudela & Susana Iglesias-Casás & Víctor Manuel González-Chordá & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón & Laura Andreu-Pejó & Águeda Cervera-Gasch, 2021. "Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part III): Healthcare Professionals, Times, and Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Narayani Paudel Ghimire & Sunil Kumar Joshi & Pranab Dahal & Katarina Swahnberg, 2021. "Women’s Experience of Disrespect and Abuse during Institutional Delivery in Biratnagar, Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Katarina Swahnberg & Anke Zbikowski & Kumudu Wijewardene & Agneta Josephson & Prembarsha Khadka & Dinesh Jeyakumaran & Udari Mambulage & Jennifer J. Infanti, 2019. "Can Forum Play Contribute to Counteracting Abuse in Health Care? A Pilot Intervention Study in Sri Lanka," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Elizabeth Zitha & Mathilda M. Mokgatle, 2020. "Women’s Views of and Responses to Maternity Services Rendered during Labor and Childbirth in Maternity Units in a Semi-Rural District in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Emanuelle Pessa Valente & Ilaria Mariani & Benedetta Covi & Marzia Lazzerini, 2022. "Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Janet Lok Chun Lee & Temmy Lee Ting Lo & Rainbow Tin Hung Ho, 2018. "Understanding Outdoor Gyms in Public Open Spaces: A Systematic Review and Integrative Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Manuela Bombana & Michel Wensing & Lisa Wittenborn & Charlotte Ullrich, 2022. "Health Education about Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors in Gynecological and Obstetric Care: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Views in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Georgia Michlig & Nicole Warren & Merry Berhe & Crista Johnson-Agbakwu, 2021. "Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among Somali Women in the U.S. State of Arizona: Evidence of Treatment Access, Health Service Use and Care Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, April.
    10. O'Brien, Cheryl & Newport, Morgan, 2023. "Prioritizing women's choices, consent, and bodily autonomy: From a continuum of violence to women-centric reproductive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    11. Dinusha Perera & Muzrif Munas & Katarina Swahnberg & Kumudu Wijewardene & Jennifer J. Infanti & on behalf of the ADVANCE Study Group, 2022. "Obstetric Violence Is Prevalent in Routine Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Study of Obstetric Violence and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Sri Lanka’s Colombo District," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Derek Asuman & Ama Pokuaa Fenny & Doreen Nyarko Anyamesem Odame, 2021. "Trends and antecedents of inequalities in maternal healthcare coverage in four African countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 515-544, April.
    13. Young-Rim Choi & Ye-Na Lee & Dayeong Kim & Won Hee Park & Dai Young Kwon & Sung Ok Chang, 2022. "An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    14. Malambo, Nomthandazo, 2021. "“Not from home”: Cancer screening avoidance and the safety of distance in Eswatini," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Bradley, Susan & McCourt, Christine & Rayment, Juliet & Parmar, Divya, 2016. "Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of women's perceptions and experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 157-170.
    16. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    17. Catarina Barata, 2022. "“Mix of Races, Bad Uterus”: Obstetric Violence in the Experiences of Afro-Brazilian Migrants in Portugal," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Smit, Anri & Coetzee, Bronwynè Jo’sean & Roomaney, Rizwana & Bradshaw, Melissa & Swartz, Leslie, 2019. "Women's stories of living with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 231-245.
    19. Lange, Isabelle L. & Kanhonou, Lydie & Goufodji, Sourou & Ronsmans, Carine & Filippi, Véronique, 2016. "The costs of ‘free’: Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin's caesarean section exemption policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 53-62.
    20. Daphne SK Lee & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Pathmawathi Subramanian & Robert Thomas Bachmann & Swee Leong Ong, 2017. "An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4065-4079, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2682-:d:345226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.