IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2134-2143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualified nurses' rate new nursing graduates as lacking skills in key clinical areas

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Missen
  • Lisa McKenna
  • Alison Beauchamp
  • Jo‐Ann Larkins

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to explore perceptions of qualified nurses on the abilities of newly registered nursing graduates to perform a variety of clinical skills. Background Evidence from the literature suggests that undergraduate nursing programmes do not adequately prepare nursing students to be practice‐ready on completion of their nursing courses. Design A descriptive quantitative design was used. Methods Participants were recruited through the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, Victorian branch. A brief explanation of the study and a link to the survey were promoted in their monthly e‐newsletter. A total of 245 qualified nurses in the state of Victoria, Australia participated in this study. A survey tool of 51 clinical skills and open‐ended questions was used, whereby participants were asked to rate new nursing graduates' abilities using a 5‐point Likert scale. Results Overall participants rated new nursing graduates' abilities for undertaking clinical skills as good or very good in 35·3% of skills, 33·3% were rated as adequate and 31·4% rated as being performed poorly or very poorly. Of concern, essential clinical skills, such as critical thinking and problem solving, working independently and assessment procedures, were found to be poorly executed and affecting new registered nurses graduates' competence. Conclusion The findings from this study can further serve as a reference for nursing education providers to enhance nursing curricula and work collaboratively with healthcare settings in preparing nurses to be competent, safe practitioners on completion of their studies. Relevance to clinical practice Identifying key areas in which new nursing graduates are not yet competent means that educational providers and educators from healthcare settings can focus on these skills in better preparing our nurses to be work ready.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Missen & Lisa McKenna & Alison Beauchamp & Jo‐Ann Larkins, 2016. "Qualified nurses' rate new nursing graduates as lacking skills in key clinical areas," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2134-2143, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2134-2143
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13316
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei Jen Chang & Ying‐Ju Chang & Shih‐Hsien Kuo & Yi‐Hsin Yang & Fan‐Hao Chou, 2011. "Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3224-3232, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Murray & Deborah Sundin & Vicki Cope, 2019. "New graduate nurses’ understanding and attitudes about patient safety upon transition to practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2543-2552, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D. Sheferaw & Tegbar Yigzaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2020. "Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Young-Rim Choi & Ye-Na Lee & Dayeong Kim & Won Hee Park & Dai Young Kwon & Sung Ok Chang, 2022. "An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    4. Daphne SK Lee & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Pathmawathi Subramanian & Robert Thomas Bachmann & Swee Leong Ong, 2017. "An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4065-4079, December.
    5. Shwu‐Ru Liou & Hsiu‐Chen Liu & Shu‐Ling Tsai & Tsui‐Ping Chu & Ching‐Yu Cheng, 2020. "Performance competence of pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses: A comparison study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2652-2662, July.
    6. Hung-Chang Liao & Ya-huei Wang, 2020. "Integrating the Gender Perspective into Literature Studies to Enhance Medical University Students’ Gender Awareness and Critical Thinking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Ichsan Rizany & Rr. Tutik Sri Hariyati & Efy Afifah & Rusdiyansyah, 2019. "The Impact of Nurse Scheduling Management on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Army Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    8. Yen-Chiao Angel Lu & Shu-Hsin Lee & Ming-Yi Hsu & Fen-Fen Shih & Wen-Jiuan Yen & Cheng-Yi Huang & Pei-Ching Li & Ching-Yen Hung & Hsiao-Ling Chuang & Ching-Pyng Kuo, 2022. "Effects of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Self-Evaluation of Their Core Competencies: A Longitudinal Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2134-2143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.