IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i17-18p2436-2447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: predictors for research use. A quantitative cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Sigrid Wangensteen
  • Inger S Johansson
  • Monica E Björkström
  • Gun Nordström

Abstract

Aim. The aim was to describe research utilisation among newly graduated nurses and to explore critical thinking dispositions and other individual and contextual factors as possible predictors for research use. Background. Nurses are expected to be research users, and variations in research utilisation are explained by individual and contextual factors. To our knowledge, critical thinking dispositions have not earlier been explored as predictors for research use. Design. A cross‐sectional design was chosen. Methods. Data collection was carried out from October 2006 to April 2007 using the Research Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ) and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI). The response rate was 33% (n = 617). Pearson’s chi‐square test and regression analyses were used for statistical calculations. Results. The respondents reported a positive attitude towards research, but only 24% (n = 148) were defined as research users. A significantly higher proportion of research users reported high critical thinking scores. Critical thinking explained 20% of the variance in attitude towards research and 11% of the variance in research use. Availability and support to implement research findings was the second strongest predictor for research use. Conclusions. Critical thinking, a significant predictor for attitude towards research and for the use of research, should be recognised and strengthened in nursing education and clinical practice. Contextual factors seem to be important for newly graduated nurses’ use of research. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurse leaders play an important role in nurturing newly graduated nurses’ critical thinking and assisting them in transferring their positive attitude towards research into research use. Nurse educators play a significant role in supporting, challenging and supervising nursing students to be critical thinkers and strong believers in research utilisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigrid Wangensteen & Inger S Johansson & Monica E Björkström & Gun Nordström, 2011. "Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: predictors for research use. A quantitative cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2436-2447, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2436-2447
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03629.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03629.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03629.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Karen Lyng Larsen & Gitte Nielsen & Britt Laugesen, 2020. "Exploring nursing students’ use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1968-1980, June.
    2. Catharina J. van Oostveen & Nicole S. Goedhart & Anneke L. Francke & Hester Vermeulen, 2017. "Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospita," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4973-4984, December.
    3. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Britt Laugesen & Iben Bøgh Bahnsen & Lone Jørgensen & Ingrid Maria Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Integrating the fundamentals of care framework in baccalaureate nursing education: An example from a nursing school in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2506-2515, June.
    4. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2436-2447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.