IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i13-14p2652-2662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance competence of pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses: A comparison study

Author

Listed:
  • Shwu‐Ru Liou
  • Hsiu‐Chen Liu
  • Shu‐Ling Tsai
  • Tsui‐Ping Chu
  • Ching‐Yu Cheng

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare and contrast the competence in clinical performance between pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses. The study also explored the most difficult technical skills for the participants to perform. Background Assessment, communication and critical thinking are competencies that help in providing safe and appropriate care for patients. Yet, self‐perceived competence was mostly measured while performance competence that reflected nurses’ performance in real cases has seldom been explored in literature. Design A cross‐sectional design was applied. The study adhered to the STROBE guidelines to improve reporting quality. Method Fifty‐two nurses and 50 nursing students completed the Computerized Model of Performance‐Based Measurement system, which measures performance competence including the steps of critical thinking, conflict resolutions and common clinical technical problems. Six case scenarios containing 107 test questions were completed. Results Only 53.85% of nurses and 20.0% of students achieved a satisfactory level of performance competence. They showed low scores on the steps of critical thinking: “collecting data from on‐site physical assessment,” “processing information,” “recognising/prioritising problems” and “arranging a course of action for patient care,” as well as solving common technical problems and conflicts. The three most difficult skills to perform were CPR, reading EKGs and venipuncture/starting intravenous lines. Conclusions The study captured the participants’ weaknesses in the critical thinking process and the nursing skills that were difficult to perform. These skills are imperative to nursing care and need to be strengthened in school and in‐service education. The academic curriculum and course design for students as well as training programmes for nurses need to be reviewed to address the challenges to be faced in a clinical setting. Relevance to clinical practice Teaching‐learning strategies that focus on enhancing critical thinking and performing difficult skills need to be designed and implemented both in practice and in school.

Suggested Citation

  • Shwu‐Ru Liou & Hsiu‐Chen Liu & Shu‐Ling Tsai & Tsui‐Ping Chu & Ching‐Yu Cheng, 2020. "Performance competence of pregraduate nursing students and hospital nurses: A comparison study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2652-2662, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2652-2662
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei Jen Chang & Ying‐Ju Chang & Shih‐Hsien Kuo & Yi‐Hsin Yang & Fan‐Hao Chou, 2011. "Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3224-3232, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D. Sheferaw & Tegbar Yigzaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2020. "Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Young-Rim Choi & Ye-Na Lee & Dayeong Kim & Won Hee Park & Dai Young Kwon & Sung Ok Chang, 2022. "An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    4. Daphne SK Lee & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Pathmawathi Subramanian & Robert Thomas Bachmann & Swee Leong Ong, 2017. "An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4065-4079, December.
    5. Hung-Chang Liao & Ya-huei Wang, 2020. "Integrating the Gender Perspective into Literature Studies to Enhance Medical University Students’ Gender Awareness and Critical Thinking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Ichsan Rizany & Rr. Tutik Sri Hariyati & Efy Afifah & Rusdiyansyah, 2019. "The Impact of Nurse Scheduling Management on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Army Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    7. Yen-Chiao Angel Lu & Shu-Hsin Lee & Ming-Yi Hsu & Fen-Fen Shih & Wen-Jiuan Yen & Cheng-Yi Huang & Pei-Ching Li & Ching-Yen Hung & Hsiao-Ling Chuang & Ching-Pyng Kuo, 2022. "Effects of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Self-Evaluation of Their Core Competencies: A Longitudinal Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Karen Missen & Lisa McKenna & Alison Beauchamp & Jo‐Ann Larkins, 2016. "Qualified nurses' rate new nursing graduates as lacking skills in key clinical areas," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2134-2143, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2652-2662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.