Author
Listed:
- Xiang Zhang
(China University of Geosciences
Hubei Luojia Laboratory
SongShan Laboratory)
- Minghui Zhang
(China University of Geosciences
Hubei Luojia Laboratory
SongShan Laboratory)
- Xin Liu
(China University of Geosciences
Hubei Luojia Laboratory
SongShan Laboratory)
- Berhanu Keno Terfa
(Addis Ababa University)
- Won-Ho Nam
(Hankyong National University)
- Xihui Gu
(China University of Geosciences
Centre for Severe Weather and Climate and Hydro-geological Hazards
University of Oxford)
- Xu Zhang
(China University of Geosciences
Hubei Luojia Laboratory
SongShan Laboratory)
- Chao Wang
(Wuhan University)
- Jian Yang
(Information Engineering University)
- Peng Wang
(GAEA Space Time Co., Ltd)
- Chenghong Hu
(AutoNavi Software Co., Ltd)
- Wenkui Wu
(China University of Geosciences)
- Nengcheng Chen
(China University of Geosciences
Hubei Luojia Laboratory)
Abstract
Geological disasters such as landslide, debris flow and collapse are major natural disasters faced by both China and the world, which seriously threaten people’s lives, property security and the socio-economic development. Although the method of using the paradigm of traditional mathematical statistics and physical model to predict the low-probability events of geological disasters have been developed for decades, the difficulty of accurate prediction still remains significant, which is recognized as a major and urgent scientific challenge in the field of Earth science. Artificial intelligence is an important driving force for a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation. However, how to systematically establish the AI prediction paradigm for low-probability events of geological disasters and deeply coupled with the physical mechanisms of geological disaster evolution and AI learning models still remains as a scientific bottleneck at the intersection of Earth science and information science. In order to clarify the latest research progress of AI prediction of geological disasters such as landslide, collapse and debris flow, this paper first quantifies the current status of global geological disasters and the urgency of prediction, and then summarizes the overall methodology of AI prediction of geological disasters. In particular, prediction feature selection, data set collection and AI prediction models have been detailly reviewed. Moreover, this review discussed the approaches in establishing the physical-informed AI model for higher accurate, robust, and explainable prediction performance. Subsequently, this paper summarizes the recent research achievements of AI prediction for landslide, collapse, and debris flow. Based on these progresses, we also analyzed the existing problems in the field of AI prediction of geological disasters, and indicated the key directions of AI prediction of geological disasters in the future. This review work is believed to be a critical guidance for future intelligent prediction on the severe geological disasters.
Suggested Citation
Xiang Zhang & Minghui Zhang & Xin Liu & Berhanu Keno Terfa & Won-Ho Nam & Xihui Gu & Xu Zhang & Chao Wang & Jian Yang & Peng Wang & Chenghong Hu & Wenkui Wu & Nengcheng Chen, 2024.
"Review on the progress and future prospects of geological disasters prediction in the era of artificial intelligence,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 11485-11525, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06673-3
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06673-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06673-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.