IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p313-d1044401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attention-Enhanced Region Proposal Networks for Multi-Scale Landslide and Mudslide Detection from Optical Remote Sensing Images

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Niu

    (School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Shandong GEO-Surveying & Mapping Institute, Jinan 250002, China)

  • Kebo Ma

    (Rizhao Marine and Fishery Research Institute, Rizhao 276800, China)

  • Xiaoyong Shen

    (Shandong Province Institute of Land Surveying and Mapping, Jinan 250013, China)

  • Xiaoming Wang

    (Shandong GEO-Surveying & Mapping Institute, Jinan 250002, China)

  • Xiao Xie

    (Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China)

  • Lin Tan

    (Shandong GEO-Surveying & Mapping Institute, Jinan 250002, China)

  • Yong Xue

    (School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Detecting areas where a landslide or a mudslide might occur is critical for emergency response, disaster recovery, and disaster cost estimation. Previous works have reported that a variety of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) significantly outperform traditional approaches for landslide/mudslide detection. These approaches always consider features from the local window and neighborhood information. The CNNs mainly focus on the features derived at a local scale, which might be inefficient for recognizing complex landslide and mudslide scenes. To effectively identify landslide and mudslide risks at a local and global scale, this paper integrates attentions into the architecture of state-of-the-art CNNs—including Faster RCNN—to develop an attention-enhanced region proposal network for multi-scale landslide/mudslide detection. In detail, we employed the attentions to process the region proposals generated by a region proposal network and then combined the results obtained from the attentions and region proposal network to identify whether the object included in a region proposal was a landslide/mudslide. Based on our developed dataset and the Bijie dataset, the experimental results prove that: (1) although the state-of-the-art CNNs for object detection can precisely detect landslides and mudslides, they are inadequate in dealing with similarity to non-landslide/non-mudslide regions; and (2) the proposed method, which integrates global features from attention layers into local features derived from CNNs, outperforms the unmodified CNNs in detecting non-landslides and non-mudslides. Our findings prove that the representations at the local and global scale might be significant for precise landslide and mudslide detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Niu & Kebo Ma & Xiaoyong Shen & Xiaoming Wang & Xiao Xie & Lin Tan & Yong Xue, 2023. "Attention-Enhanced Region Proposal Networks for Multi-Scale Landslide and Mudslide Detection from Optical Remote Sensing Images," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:313-:d:1044401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Israr Ullah & Bilal Aslam & Syed Hassan Iqbal Ahmad Shah & Aqil Tariq & Shujing Qin & Muhammad Majeed & Hans-Balder Havenith, 2022. "An Integrated Approach of Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, and GIS Data for the Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Charalampos Kontoes & Constantinos Loupasakis & Ioannis Papoutsis & Stavroula Alatza & Eleftheria Poyiadji & Athanassios Ganas & Christina Psychogyiou & Mariza Kaskara & Sylvia Antoniadi & Natalia Spa, 2021. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of Central and Western Greece, Combining NGI and WoE Methods, with Remote Sensing and Ground Truth Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Kemal Hacıefendioğlu & Gökhan Demir & Hasan Basri Başağa, 2021. "Landslide detection using visualization techniques for deep convolutional neural network models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 329-350, October.
    4. Marko Sinčić & Sanja Bernat Gazibara & Martin Krkač & Hrvoje Lukačić & Snježana Mihalić Arbanas, 2022. "The Use of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Data in Preparation of Input Data for Large-Scale Landslide Hazard Assessments," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-37, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingyun Ji & Yuan Liang & Fanglin Xie & Zhengbo Yu & Yanli Wang, 2024. "Automatic and Efficient Detection of Loess Landslides Based on Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuandong Huang & Chong Xu & Lei Li & Xiangli He & Jia Cheng & Xiwei Xu & Junlei Li & Xujiao Zhang, 2022. "Inventory and Spatial Distribution of Ancient Landslides in Hualong County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Mohib Ullah & Bingzhe Tang & Wenchao Huangfu & Dongdong Yang & Yingdong Wei & Haijun Qiu, 2024. "Machine Learning-Driven Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Himalayan China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Xianmin Wang & Xinlong Zhang & Jia Bi & Xudong Zhang & Shiqiang Deng & Zhiwei Liu & Lizhe Wang & Haixiang Guo, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Based on Potential Disaster Identification and Ensemble Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Xianyu Yu & Tingting Xiong & Weiwei Jiang & Jianguo Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Fan Yang & Xiaozhi Men & Yangsheng Liu & Huigeng Mao & Yingnan Wang & Li Wang & Xiran Zhou & Chong Niu & Xiao Xie, 2023. "Estimation of Landslide and Mudslide Susceptibility with Multi-Modal Remote Sensing Data and Semantics: The Case of Yunnan Mountain Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Asad Aziz & Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Muhammad Majeed & Sammer Fatima & Syed Shajee Mehdi & Wali Muhammad Mangrio & Amine Elbouzidi & Muhammad Abdullah & Shadab Shaukat & Nafeesa Zahid & Eman A. Mahmo, 2023. "Quantifying Landscape and Social Amenities as Ecosystem Services in Rapidly Changing Peri-Urban Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Purna Bahadur Thapa & Saurav Lamichhane & Khagendra Prasad Joshi & Aayoush Raj Regmi & Divya Bhattarai & Hari Adhikari, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Nepal’s Chure Region: A Geospatial Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Shaohan Zhang & Shucheng Tan & Yongqi Sun & Duanyu Ding & Wei Yang, 2024. "Risk Mapping of Geological Hazards in Plateau Mountainous Areas Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data Extraction and Machine Learning (Fuyuan, China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Yu Huang & Jianqiang Zhang & Lili Zhang & Zaiyang Ming & Haiqing He & Rong Chen & Yonggang Ge & Rongkun Liu, 2023. "How Spatial Resolution of Remote Sensing Image Affects Earthquake Triggered Landslide Detection: An Example from 2022 Luding Earthquake, Sichuan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Shuai Liu & Jieyong Zhu & Dehu Yang & Bo Ma, 2022. "Comparative Study of Geological Hazard Evaluation Systems Using Grid Units and Slope Units under Different Rainfall Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:313-:d:1044401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.