IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v114y2022i3d10.1007_s11069-022-05520-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling landslide susceptibility using data mining techniques of kernel logistic regression, fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm, SysFor and random forest

Author

Listed:
  • Tingyu Zhang

    (The Ministry of Natural Resources
    Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd)

  • Quan Fu

    (Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Land Survey Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd.)

  • Chao Li

    (Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd.)

  • Fangfang Liu

    (Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Land Survey Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd.)

  • Huanyuan Wang

    (Chang’an University)

  • Ling Han

    (Chang’an University)

  • Renata Pacheco Quevedo

    (National Institute for Space Research (INPE))

  • Tianqing Chen

    (The Ministry of Natural Resources
    Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd)

  • Na Lei

    (The Ministry of Natural Resources
    Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd)

Abstract

This paper introduces four advanced intelligent algorithms, namely kernel logistic regression, fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm, systematically developed forest of multiple decision trees and random forest (RF), to perform the landslide susceptibility mapping in Jian’ge County, China, as well as well study of the connection between landslide occurrence and regional geo-environment characteristics. To start with, 262 landslide events were determined, and the proportion of randomly generated training data is 70%, while the proportion of randomly generated validation data is 30%, respectively. Then, through the comprehensive consideration of local geo-environment characteristics and relevant studies, fifteen conditioning factors were prepared, such as slope angle, slope aspect, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, sediment transport index, topographic wetness index, stream power index, distance to rivers, distance to roads, distance to lineaments, soil, land use, lithology and NDVI. Next, frequency ratio model was utilized to identify the corresponding relations for conditioning factors and landslides distribution. In addition, four data mining techniques were conducted to implement the landslide susceptibility research and generated landslide susceptibility maps. In order to examine and compare model performance, receiver operating characteristic curve was brought for judging accuracy of those four models. Finally, the results indicated that a traditional model, namely RF model, acquired the highest AUC value (0.859). Last but gained a lot of attention, the results can provide references for land use management and landslide prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingyu Zhang & Quan Fu & Chao Li & Fangfang Liu & Huanyuan Wang & Ling Han & Renata Pacheco Quevedo & Tianqing Chen & Na Lei, 2022. "Modeling landslide susceptibility using data mining techniques of kernel logistic regression, fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm, SysFor and random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3327-3358, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:114:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05520-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05520-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05520-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05520-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Martinello & Chiara Cappadonia & Christian Conoscenti & Valerio Agnesi & Edoardo Rotigliano, 2021. "Optimal slope units partitioning in landslide susceptibility mapping," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 152-162, June.
    2. Wei Xie & Wen Nie & Pooya Saffari & Luis F. Robledo & Pierre-Yves Descote & Wenbin Jian, 2021. "Landslide hazard assessment based on Bayesian optimization–support vector machine in Nanping City, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 931-948, October.
    3. Gökhan Demir, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by using statistical analysis in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) on the northern part of Suşehri Town, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 133-154, May.
    4. Li, Jianming & Zhang, Yanjun, 2017. "GIS-supported certainty factor (CF) models for assessment of geothermal potential: A case study of Tengchong County, southwest China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 552-565.
    5. Guilherme Garcia Oliveira & Luis Fernando Chimelo Ruiz & Laurindo Antonio Guasselli & Claus Haetinger, 2019. "Random forest and artificial neural networks in landslide susceptibility modeling: a case study of the Fão River Basin, Southern Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1049-1073, November.
    6. Weidong Wang & Zhuolei He & Zheng Han & Yange Li & Jie Dou & Jianling Huang, 2020. "Mapping the susceptibility to landslides based on the deep belief network: a case study in Sichuan Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3239-3261, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rana Muhammad Adnan Ikram & Imran Khan & Hossein Moayedi & Atefeh Ahmadi Dehrashid & Ismail Elkhrachy & Binh Nguyen Le, 2024. "Novel evolutionary-optimized neural network for predicting landslide susceptibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17687-17719, July.
    2. Yu Bian & Hao Chen & Zujian Liu & Ling Chen & Ya Guo & Yongpeng Yang, 2024. "Geological Disaster Susceptibility Evaluation Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of the Atal Tunnel in Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Yuan & Jing Chen, 2022. "A hybrid deep learning method for landslide susceptibility analysis with the application of InSAR data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1393-1426, November.
    2. Sukanta Malakar & Abhishek K. Rai & Arun K. Gupta, 2023. "Earthquake risk mapping in the Himalayas by integrated analytical hierarchy process, entropy with neural network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 951-975, March.
    3. Paulo Rodolpho Pereira Hader & Fábio Augusto Gomes Vieira Reis & Anna Silvia Palcheco Peixoto, 2022. "Landslide risk assessment considering socionatural factors: methodology and application to Cubatão municipality, São Paulo, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1273-1304, January.
    4. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Chuhan Wang & Qigen Lin & Leibin Wang & Tong Jiang & Buda Su & Yanjun Wang & Sanjit Kumar Mondal & Jinlong Huang & Ying Wang, 2022. "The influences of the spatial extent selection for non-landslide samples on statistical-based landslide susceptibility modelling: a case study of Anhui Province in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 1967-1988, July.
    6. El Hage, Hicham & Herez, Amal & Ramadan, Mohamad & Bazzi, Hassan & Khaled, Mahmoud, 2018. "An investigation on solar drying: A review with economic and environmental assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 815-829.
    7. Deborah Simon Mwakapesa & Yimin Mao & Xiaoji Lan & Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using DIvisive ANAlysis (DIANA) and RObust Clustering Using linKs (ROCK) Algorithms, and Comparison of Their Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Lu Fang & Qian Wang & Jianping Yue & Yin Xing, 2023. "Analysis of Optimal Buffer Distance for Linear Hazard Factors in Landslide Susceptibility Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Hussein Almohamad & Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi & Motirh Al-Mutiry, 2022. "GIS-Based Frequency Ratio and Analytic Hierarchy Process for Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping in the Western Region of Syria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Xiaojie Geng & Shunchuan Wu & Yanjie Zhang & Junlong Sun & Haiyong Cheng & Zhongxin Zhang & Shijiang Pu, 2023. "Developing hybrid XGBoost model integrated with entropy weight and Bayesian optimization for predicting tunnel squeezing intensity," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 751-771, October.
    11. Yuto Omae, 2023. "Effects of Exploration Weight and Overtuned Kernel Parameters on Gaussian Process-Based Bayesian Optimization Search Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Soheila Pouyan & Mojgan Bordbar & Foroogh Golkar & John J. Clague, 2023. "Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3797-3816, April.
    13. Muhammad Muzamil Khan & Bushra Ghaffar & Rasim Shahzad & M. Riaz Khan & Munawar Shah & Ali H. Amin & Sayed M. Eldin & Najam Abbas Naqvi & Rashid Ali, 2022. "Atmospheric Anomalies Associated with the 2021 M w 7.2 Haiti Earthquake Using Machine Learning from Multiple Satellites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Zefang Zhang & Zhikuan Qian & Yong Wei & Xing Zhu & Linjun Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Geological Disaster Sensitivity in Shuicheng District Based on the WOE-RF Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Lei Yang & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Amin Jan & Belgacem Bouallegue & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Nermin M. Salem, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of the Optimized KNN, SVM, and Ensemble DT Models Using Bayesian Optimization for Predicting Pedestrian Fatalities: An Advance towards Realizing the Sustainable Safety of Pedestri," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Ramos-Escudero, Adela & García-Cascales, M. Socorro & Cuevas, Jose M. & Sanner, Burkhard & Urchueguía, Javier F., 2021. "Spatial analysis of indicators affecting the exploitation of shallow geothermal energy at European scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 266-281.
    17. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    18. Mustafa Kamal & Baolei Zhang & Jianfei Cao & Xin Zhang & Jun Chang, 2022. "Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Model for Susceptibility Assessment of Landslides Induced by Earthquake in the Western Sichuan Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Xiao-yan Huang & Li He & Hua-sheng Zhao & Ying Huang & Yu-shuang Wu, 2021. "Prediction model based on the Laplacian eigenmap method combined with a random forest algorithm for rainstorm satellite images during the first annual rainy season in South China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 331-353, May.
    20. Jinming Zhang & Jianxi Qian & Yuefeng Lu & Xueyuan Li & Zhenqi Song, 2024. "Study on Landslide Susceptibility Based on Multi-Model Coupling: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:114:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05520-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.