IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i13d10.1007_s11069-024-06672-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Naive Bayes, kernel logistic regression and alternation decision tree for landslide susceptibility mapping in Pengyang County, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Shang

    (Xi’an University of Science and Technology)

  • Sihang Liu

    (Xi’an University of Science and Technology)

  • Jiaxin Zhong

    (Chang’an University
    Ningxia Institute of Survey and Monitoring of Land and Resources)

  • Paraskevas Tsangaratos

    (National Technical University of Athens)

  • Ioanna Ilia

    (National Technical University of Athens)

  • Wei Chen

    (Xi’an University of Science and Technology)

  • Yunzhi Chen

    (Xi’an University of Science and Technology)

  • Yang Liu

    (Xi’an University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to apply and compare the performance of the three machine learning algorithms-Naive Bayes (NB), kernel logistic regression (KLR), and alternation decision tree (ADT) to come up with landslide susceptibility maps for Pengyang County, a landslide-prone area in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. In the first phase, we constructed a landslide inventory map consisting of 972 landslides and the same quantity of non-landslides based on digital elevation model analysis, survey data and satellite images, then combined the two databases and classified into training and validating subsets randomly at the ratio of 70:30. Secondly, 13 conditional factors were prepared, and feature selection was performed using average merit. Subsequently, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), root mean square error, mean squared error, and frequency ratio precision to test the validity and prediction ability of the models. This outcome demonstrated that three models are all predictive and can generate adequate results in the study scope, and the ADT model is entitled with the best performance, whose AUC values are 0.844 for the training dataset and 0.838 for the validation dataset. The next is KLR (0.811 for the training dataset, 0.814 for the validation dataset) and then NB (0.808 for the training dataset, 0.797 for the validation dataset) models. Meanwhile, the frequency ratio precision of ADT model is 0.971, which is higher than KLR (0.844) and NB (0.810). The suggested landslide susceptibility map and corresponding method enable researchers and local authorities in future decision-making for geological disaster prevention and mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Shang & Sihang Liu & Jiaxin Zhong & Paraskevas Tsangaratos & Ioanna Ilia & Wei Chen & Yunzhi Chen & Yang Liu, 2024. "Application of Naive Bayes, kernel logistic regression and alternation decision tree for landslide susceptibility mapping in Pengyang County, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 12043-12079, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06672-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06672-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06672-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06672-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Yuan & Jing Chen, 2022. "A hybrid deep learning method for landslide susceptibility analysis with the application of InSAR data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1393-1426, November.
    2. Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie & Faramarz Sarfaraz & Samad Shadfar & Rouhangiz Akhtari, 2021. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1025-1046, August.
    3. Silvana Moragues & María Gabriela Lenzano & Mario Lanfri & Stella Moreiras & Esteban Lannutti & Luis Lenzano, 2021. "Analytic hierarchy process applied to landslide susceptibility mapping of the North Branch of Argentino Lake, Argentina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 915-941, January.
    4. Binh Thai Pham & Indra Prakash & Wei Chen & Hai-Bang Ly & Lanh Si Ho & Ebrahim Omidvar & Van Phong Tran & Dieu Tien Bui, 2019. "A Novel Intelligence Approach of a Sequential Minimal Optimization-Based Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Tingyu Zhang & Quan Fu & Chao Li & Fangfang Liu & Huanyuan Wang & Ling Han & Renata Pacheco Quevedo & Tianqing Chen & Na Lei, 2022. "Modeling landslide susceptibility using data mining techniques of kernel logistic regression, fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm, SysFor and random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3327-3358, December.
    6. Trung-Hieu Tran & Nguyen Duc Dam & Fazal E. Jalal & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Lanh Si Ho & Tran Van Phong & Mudassir Iqbal & Hiep Van Le & Hanh Bich Thi Nguyen & Indra Prakash & Binh Thai Pham, 2021. "GIS-Based Soft Computing Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Pithoragarh District, Uttarakhand State, India," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Idris Bello Yamusa & Mohd Suhaili Ismail & Abdulwaheed Tella, 2022. "Highway Proneness Appraisal to Landslides along Taiping to Ipoh Segment Malaysia, Using MCDM and GIS Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Huadan Fan & Yuefeng Lu & Yulong Hu & Jun Fang & Chengzhe Lv & Changqing Xu & Xinyi Feng & Yanru Liu, 2022. "A Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Highway Disasters Based on the Frequency Ratio Coupling Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Zohre Hoseinzade & Asal Zavarei & Kourosh Shirani, 2021. "Application of prediction–area plot in the assessment of MCDM methods through VIKOR, PROMETHEE II, and permutation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2489-2507, December.
    4. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Ge Yan & Guoan Tang & Sijin Li & Dingyang Lu & Liyang Xiong & Shouyun Liang, 2023. "Uncertainty in regional scale assessment of landslide susceptibility using various resolutions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 399-423, May.
    6. Jonmenjoy Barman & Brototi Biswas & K. Srinivasa Rao, 2024. "A hybrid integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) for landslide susceptibility zonation of Aizawl, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8571-8596, July.
    7. Rana Muhammad Adnan Ikram & Imran Khan & Hossein Moayedi & Atefeh Ahmadi Dehrashid & Ismail Elkhrachy & Binh Nguyen Le, 2024. "Novel evolutionary-optimized neural network for predicting landslide susceptibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17687-17719, July.
    8. Mansheng Lin & Shuai Teng & Gongfa Chen & David Bassir, 2023. "Transfer Learning with Attributes for Improving the Landslide Spatial Prediction Performance in Sample-Scarce Area Based on Variational Autoencoder Generative Adversarial Network," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Phong Tung Nguyen & Duong Hai Ha & Abolfazl Jaafari & Huu Duy Nguyen & Tran Van Phong & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Indra Prakash & Hiep Van Le & Binh Thai Pham, 2020. "Groundwater Potential Mapping Combining Artificial Neural Network and Real AdaBoost Ensemble Technique: The DakNong Province Case-study, Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Yu Bian & Hao Chen & Zujian Liu & Ling Chen & Ya Guo & Yongpeng Yang, 2024. "Geological Disaster Susceptibility Evaluation Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of the Atal Tunnel in Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Jinming Zhang & Jianxi Qian & Yuefeng Lu & Xueyuan Li & Zhenqi Song, 2024. "Study on Landslide Susceptibility Based on Multi-Model Coupling: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Hyung-Sup Jung & Saro Lee & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2020. "Sustainable Applications of Remote Sensing and Geospatial Information Systems to Earth Observations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-6, March.
    13. Mahdi Bitarafan & Kambod Amini Hosseini & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani, 2023. "Evaluating Natural Hazards in Cities Using a Novel Integrated MCDM Approach (Case Study: Tehran City)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Ran Wang & Hao Lin & Jinhua Cheng & Zixi Xu & Haoying Feng & Yameng Tang, 2022. "Optimizing the Water Ecological Environment of Mining Cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Using the Cloud Model, CV-TOPSIS, and Coupling Coordination Degree," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Yalu Han & Lizhi Du & Shiwei Shen, 2023. "Study on shear test and shear displacement of frozen joints with different opening degrees," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 289-307, January.
    16. Michael Makonyo & Zahor Zahor, 2023. "GIS-based analysis of landslides susceptibility mapping: a case study of Lushoto district, north-eastern Tanzania," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 1085-1115, September.
    17. Masanori Kohno & Yuki Higuchi & Yusuke Ono, 2023. "Evaluating earthquake-induced widespread slope failure hazards using an AHP-GIS combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1485-1512, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06672-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.