IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijocsr/v4y2019i1d10.1186_s40991-018-0039-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Andrés Latapí Agudelo

    (University of Iceland)

  • Lára Jóhannsdóttir

    (University of Iceland)

  • Brynhildur Davídsdóttir

    (University of Iceland)

Abstract

There is a long and varied history associated with the evolution of the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). However, a historical review is missing in the academic literature that portrays the evolution of the academic understanding of the concept alongside with the public and international events that influenced the social expectations with regards to corporate behavior. The aim of this paper is to provide a distinctive historical perspective on the evolution of CSR as a conceptual paradigm by reviewing the most relevant factors that have shaped its understanding and definition, such as academic contributions, international policies and significant social and political events. To do so, the method used is a comprehensive literature review that explores the most relevant academic contributions and public events that have influenced the evolutionary process of CSR and how they have done so. The findings show that the understanding of corporate responsibility has evolved from being limited to the generation of profit to include a broader set of responsibilities to the latest belief that the main responsibility of companies should be the generation of shared value. The findings also indicate that as social expectations of corporate behavior changed, so did the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility. The findings suggest that CSR continues to be relevant within the academic literature and can be expected to remain part of the business vocabulary at least in the short term and as a result, the authors present a plausible future for CSR that takes into consideration its historical evolution. Finally, this paper gives way for future academic research to explore how CSR can help address the latest social expectations of generating shared value as a main business objective, which in turn may have practical implications if CSR is implemented with this in mind.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Andrés Latapí Agudelo & Lára Jóhannsdóttir & Brynhildur Davídsdóttir, 2019. "A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:4:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-018-0039-y
    DOI: 10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werther, William Jr. & Chandler, David, 2005. "Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 317-324.
    2. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    4. Kao, Erin H. & Yeh, Chih-Chuan & Wang, Li-Hsun & Fung, Hung-Gay, 2018. "The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 155-170.
    5. Marie-Laure Djelic & Helen Etchanchu, 2017. "Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 641-661, June.
    6. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    7. Mahoney, Joseph T. & Godfrey, Paul, 2014. "'The Functions of the Executive' at 75: An Invitation to Reconsider a Timeless Classic," Working Papers 14-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    8. Walton, Clarence C., 1982. "Corporate social responsibility: The debate revisited," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 173-187.
    9. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marek Sieminski & Ewa Wedrowska & Krzysztof Krukowski, 2020. "Cultural Aspect of Social Responsibility Implementation in SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 68-84.
    2. Ewa Stawicka, 2021. "Sustainable Development in the Digital Age of Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, April.
    3. N.V. Starodubets & A.E. Grigoreva, 2020. "Methodological Toolkit for Environmental and Economic Assessment of Metallurgical Enterprise Activities," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(4), pages 565-584.
    4. Giovanna Centorrino, 2020. "Covid-19 and the Search for the Common Good: The Case of Parmon Spa (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Iwona Zdonek & Anna Mularczyk & Grzegorz Polok, 2021. "The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Mauricio Latapí & Lára Jóhannsdóttir & Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir & Mette Morsing, 2021. "The Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility in the Nordic Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Milenkovska, Violeta & Petrovska, Julijana & Stoilkovska, Aleksandra, 2019. "Positive Attitude Towards Business Ethics And Social Responsibility For Improving Corporate Image," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 10(1), pages 97-107.
    8. Christiana Kappo-Abidemi & Ogujiuba Kanayo, 2020. "Higher education institutions and corporate social responsibility: triple bottomline as a conceptual framework for community development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1103-1119, December.
    9. Gino B. Bianco, 2020. "Climate change adaptation, coffee, and corporate social responsibility: challenges and opportunities," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Peter Jones, 2023. "Corporate Digital Responsibility in the Retail Industry: Cameo Case Studies of Two German Retailers," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 9(3), pages 369-380, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deepa Sharma & Suman Chakraborty & Ashwath Ananda Rao & Lumen Shawn Lobo, 2023. "The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    2. Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2022. "Navigating Between the Plots: A Narratological and Ethical Analysis of Business-Related Conspiracy Theories (BrCTs)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 265-288, January.
    3. Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Emilio Abad-Segura & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2020. "Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Kuang-Hua Hu & Sin-Jin Lin & Jau-Yang Liu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Shih-Han Chen, 2018. "The Influences of CSR’s Multi-Dimensional Characteristics on Firm Value Determination by a Fusion Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Varsha Singh & Sakshi Kathuria & Deepika Puri & Bharat Kapoor, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and behavioral intentions: A mediating mechanism of Brand Recognition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1698-1711, July.
    6. Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2020. "Navigating Between the Plots: A Narratological and Ethical Analysis of Business-Related Conspiracy Theories (BrCTs)," Post-Print hal-03289831, HAL.
    7. Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Maria Lourdes Arco-Castro & Maria Victoria Lopez-Perez & Lazaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2020. "Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    9. Kelsy Hejjas & Graham Miller & Caroline Scarles, 2019. "“It’s Like Hating Puppies!” Employee Disengagement and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 319-337, June.
    10. Hana Hlochova, 2019. "The Origins of CSR In Theory and Practice: Chapter from CSR History In The CEE Region," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 10(4), pages 84-101, December.
    11. Sapanna Laysiriroj & Walter Wehrmeyer, 2020. "Intergenerational differences of CSR activities in family-run businesses in eastern Thailand," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Francesco Gangi & Mario Mustilli & Nicola Varrone & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Banks’ Financial Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 42-58, October.
    13. WANG Jifu & GUPTA Vipin & LYBOLT Liza & WANG Xiuli, 2022. "Corrected Game Model In Csr: Mnc Strategies And Chinese Practice," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 269-287, December.
    14. Nir Halevy & Sora Jun & Eileen Y. Chou, 2020. "Intergroup Conflict is Our Business: CEOs’ Ethical Intergroup Leadership Fuels Stakeholder Support for Corporate Intergroup Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 229-246, February.
    15. Vincenzo Formisano & Bernardino Quattrociocchi & Maria Fedele & Mario Calabrese, 2018. "From Viability to Sustainability: The Contribution of the Viable Systems Approach (VSA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin, 2011. "The effects of value on the perception of corporate social responsibility implementation: A study of Chinese youth," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 246-262, July.
    17. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Jose Luis Retolaza & Maite Ruiz & Leire San‐Jose, 2009. "CSR in business start‐ups: an application method for stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 324-336, November.
    19. Tomina Saveanu & Daniel Badulescu & Sorana Saveanu & Maria-Madela Abrudan & Alina Badulescu, 2021. "The Role of Owner-Managers in Shaping CSR Activity of Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Luis Fonseca & Vitor Silva & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima & Gilberto Santos & Rui Silva, 2022. "B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 496-508, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:4:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-018-0039-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.