IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i10d10.1007_s10668-022-02526-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon footprint of offshore platform in Indonesia using life cycle approach

Author

Listed:
  • Aditya Prana Iswara

    (Chung Yuan Christian University
    Chung Yuan Christian University)

  • Aulia Ulfah Farahdiba

    (Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur)

  • Rachmat Boedisantoso

    (Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS)

  • Anwar Rosyid

    (Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS)

  • Sunu Priambodo

    (Pertamina Hulu Energi West Madura Offshore)

  • Lin-Han Chiang Hsieh

    (Chung Yuan Christian University
    Chung Yuan Christian University)

Abstract

Unlike carbon footprint in fossil fuel usage, few studies have investigated carbon footprint in the upstream petroleum industry. Currently, there is no published offshore carbon footprint study, and the carbon footprint of unmanned offshore platforms in Indonesia remains unclear. This study aims to identify the potential carbon footprint of offshore platforms in the Madura Field during offshore production based on the data activity using the life cycle approach. The data inventory had been monitored for a one-year natural gas production cycle from four unmanned platforms and one processing platform in Madura Field. The results show that the unmanned offshore platforms generated an average of 98.77 kg CO2eq/GJ with a high deviation (± 3.34). The processing platform’s average carbon footprint is 1232 kg CO2eq/GJ, which indicates the wide carbon footprint range between production platforms. Carbon footprint in the offshore platform is essential for completing the cradle to grave footprint identification since it is one of the important environmental sustainable indicators used as environmental evaluation tools. Understanding the footprint level in the upstream petroleum industry is significant for studying climate change’s impact on offshore activity, potential carbon generation released to the environment, and the key step of establishing a carbon reduction plan for the petroleum industry. Therefore, climate sustainability evaluation in the upstream petroleum industry can be assessed continuously.

Suggested Citation

  • Aditya Prana Iswara & Aulia Ulfah Farahdiba & Rachmat Boedisantoso & Anwar Rosyid & Sunu Priambodo & Lin-Han Chiang Hsieh, 2023. "Carbon footprint of offshore platform in Indonesia using life cycle approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11263-11284, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02526-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02526-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02526-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02526-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuantao Yang & Shen Qu & Bofeng Cai & Sai Liang & Zhaohua Wang & Jinnan Wang & Ming Xu, 2020. "Mapping global carbon footprint in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Tao Gao & Qing Liu & Jianping Wang, 2014. "A comparative study of carbon footprint and assessment standards," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 237-243.
    3. Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Christian & Mutel, Christopher L. & Volkart, Kathrin, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 326-338.
    4. Yu Gan & Hassan M. El-Houjeiri & Alhassan Badahdah & Zifeng Lu & Hao Cai & Steven Przesmitzki & Michael Wang, 2020. "Carbon footprint of global natural gas supplies to China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Mei, H. & Li, Y.P. & Suo, C. & Ma, Y. & Lv, J., 2020. "Analyzing the impact of climate change on energy-economy-carbon nexus system in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Jacyno, Tomasz & Breuhaus, Peter & Voldsund, Mari & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of an upstream petroleum plant operated on a mature field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 454-469.
    7. Li, Zhuochao & Zhang, Haoran & Meng, Jing & Long, Yin & Yan, Yamin & Li, Meixuan & Huang, Zhongliang & Liang, Yongtu, 2020. "Reducing carbon footprint of deep-sea oil and gas field exploitation by optimization for Floating Production Storage and Offloading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    8. Richard Plevin & Mark Delucchi & Felix Creutzig, 2014. "Response to Comments on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation …”," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 468-470, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cudjoe, Dan & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Hong, 2024. "The role of incentive policies and personal innovativeness in consumers' carbon footprint tracking apps adoption in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Qingchun Guan & Tianya Meng & Chengyang Guan & Junwen Chen & Hui Li & Xu Zhou, 2024. "Multi-Scale Analysis of Carbon Emissions in Coastal Cities Based on Multi-Source Data: A Case Study of Qingdao, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Sharath Ankathi & Zifeng Lu & George G. Zaimes & Troy Hawkins & Yu Gan & Michael Wang, 2022. "Greenhouse gas emissions from the global transportation of crude oil: Current status and mitigation potential," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2045-2056, December.
    4. Daina Paulikas & Steven Katona & Erika Ilves & Saleem H. Ali, 2022. "Deep‐sea nodules versus land ores: A comparative systems analysis of mining and processing wastes for battery‐metal supply chains," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2154-2177, December.
    5. Ortiz, C. & Valverde, J.M. & Chacartegui, R. & Benítez-Guerrero, M. & Perejón, A. & Romeo, L.M., 2017. "The Oxy-CaL process: A novel CO2 capture system by integrating partial oxy-combustion with the Calcium-Looping process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Gebara, C.H. & Laurent, A., 2023. "National SDG-7 performance assessment to support achieving sustainable energy for all within planetary limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Murray A. Rudd, 2023. "Bitcoin Is Full of Surprises," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Arianne Provost‐Savard & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, 2024. "Substitution modeling can coherently be used in attributional life cycle assessments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 410-425, June.
    9. Yadav, Deepak & Banerjee, Rangan, 2020. "Net energy and carbon footprint analysis of solar hydrogen production from the high-temperature electrolysis process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    10. Dai, Zhifeng & Hu, Juan & Liu, Xinheng & Yang, Mi, 2024. "ynamic time-domain and frequency-domain spillovers and portfolio strategies between climate change attention and energy-relevant markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Noshchenko, Olga & Hagspiel, Verena, 2024. "Environmental and economic multi-objective real options analysis: Electrification choices for field development investment planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    12. Cheng, Qian & Liu, Pan & Xia, Qian & Cheng, Lei & Ming, Bo & Zhang, Wei & Xu, Weifeng & Zheng, Yalian & Han, Dongyang & Xia, Jun, 2023. "An analytical method to evaluate curtailment of hydro–photovoltaic hybrid energy systems and its implication under climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Adedayo Johnson Ogungbile & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Ibrahim Yahaya Wuni & Jin Xue & Jingke Hong, 2021. "A Hybrid Framework for Direct CO 2 Emissions Quantification in China’s Construction Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Naseri, Hakim & Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami & Ranjbar, Iraj & Zamani, Davood Mohammad, 2021. "Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Gan, Yu & Wang, Michael & Lu, Zifeng & Kelly, Jarod, 2021. "Taking into account greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles for transportation de-carbonization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Delera, Michele, 2021. "Is production in global value chains (GVCs) sustainable? A review of the empirical evidence on social and environmental sustainabilitiy in GVCs," PEGNet Policy Studies 04/2020, PEGNet - Poverty Reduction, Equity and Growth Network, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    17. Cox, Brian & Bauer, Christian & Mendoza Beltran, Angelica & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Mutel, Christopher L., 2020. "Life cycle environmental and cost comparison of current and future passenger cars under different energy scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    18. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Fülöp, Tamás Gábor & Breuhaus, Peter & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Life performance of oil and gas platforms: Site integration and thermodynamic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 282-301.
    19. Tsai, Yu-Chun & Feng, Yong-Qiang & Shuai, Yong & Lai, Jhao-Hong & Leung, Michael K.H. & Wei, Yen & Hsu, Hua-Yi & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2023. "Experimental validation of a 0.3 kW ORC for the future purposes in the study of low-grade thermal to power conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    20. Lewandowska-Bernat, Anna & Desideri, Umberto, 2018. "Opportunities of power-to-gas technology in different energy systems architectures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 57-67.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02526-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.