IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v12y2022i3d10.1007_s13162-022-00248-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline

Author

Listed:
  • Sreedhar Madhavaram

    (Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech University)

  • Hunter N. Hatfield

    (Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech University)

Abstract

The six commentaries on Hunt, Madhavaram, and Hatfield (hereafter, HMH, AMS Review, 2022, in this issue) and “the manifesto conversation” (hereafter, TMC) deeply reflected on HMH and TMC; assessed, among other things, the value of borrowed theories, doctoral programs, fragmentation, indigenous theory development, mainstream central focus, middle-range theories, and stakeholder relevance/engagement; and provided further foundations and put forward several opportunities for continuing TMC toward renewing the marketing discipline. In response, we develop a new conceptualization for renewal capability, and elaborate that renewal capability building (for the marketing discipline) entails policies, activities, and decisions for bringing together human (e.g., its scholars and stakeholders) and institutional resources (e.g., its journals and professional associations) to produce proactive and reactive innovations (for the marketing discipline). Overall, HMH, TMC, the six commentaries, and this response cumulatively provide foundations for continuing the TMC toward building a robust renewal capability for the marketing discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00248-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    2. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 375-389, December.
    3. Anders Gustafsson & Tohid Ghanbarpour, 2022. "Challenging the troubled status of the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 184-187, December.
    4. Manjit S. Yadav, 2020. "Reimagining marketing doctoral programs," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 56-64, June.
    5. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    6. Tandy Chalmers Thomas & Linda L. Price & Hope Jensen Schau, 2013. "When Differences Unite: Resource Dependence in Heterogeneous Consumption Communities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(5), pages 1010-1033.
    7. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    8. Rajan Varadarajan, 2022. "A general theory of marketing: Conceivable, elusive, or illusive," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 177-183, December.
    9. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    10. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    11. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    2. Rajan Varadarajan, 2022. "A general theory of marketing: Conceivable, elusive, or illusive," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 177-183, December.
    3. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    4. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    5. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    6. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    7. Clark, Terry & Azab, Carol & Martin Key, Thomas, 2024. "Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Matthew Hawkins, 2018. "Researching and marketing to consumption collectives," Post-Print hal-01809954, HAL.
    9. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    10. Anne Sorensen & Judy Drennan, 2017. "Understanding value-creating practices in social media-based brand communities," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(15-16), pages 986-1007, December.
    11. Hawkins, Matthew A., 2020. "The moderating effect of need for belonging and communal-brand connection on counterfeit purchasing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Alexander P. Henkel & Johannes Boegershausen & Robert Ciuchita & Gaby Odekerken-Schröder, 2017. "Storm after the Quiet: How Marketplace Interactions Shape Consumer Resources in Collective Goal Pursuits," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 26-47.
    13. Matthew Hawkins, 2020. "The moderating effect of need for belonging and communal-brand connection on counterfeit purchasing," Post-Print hal-02943037, HAL.
    14. Fujita, Momoko & Harrigan, Paul & Soutar, Geoffrey N. & Kumar Roy, Sanjit & Roy, Rajat, 2020. "Enhancing member-institution relationships through social media: The role of other-user engagement behavior and similarity perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 642-654.
    15. He, Xuan & Xiao, Weicheng, 2022. "What drives family SMEs to internationalize? An integrated perspective of community institutions and knowledge resources," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:762-785. is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Stephen L. Vargo, 2022. "Fostering scholarly discussion in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 137-138, December.
    18. Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    20. Hope Jensen Schau & Melissa Archpru Akaka, 2021. "From customer journeys to consumption journeys: a consumer culture approach to investigating value creation in practice-embedded consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 9-22, June.
    21. Biraghi, Silvia & Gambetti, Rossella & Pace, Stefano, 2018. "Between tribes and markets: The emergence of a liquid consumer-entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 392-402.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00248-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.