IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v12y2022i3d10.1007_s13162-022-00238-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal

Author

Listed:
  • Shelby D. Hunt

    (Texas Tech University)

  • Sreedhar Madhavaram

    (Texas Tech University)

  • Hunter N. Hatfield

    (Texas Tech University)

Abstract

Numerous commentators note that marketing is entering its fifth era of evolutionary development as a troubled discipline. Marketing’s troubled evolutionary trajectory has led to what this article labels “the manifesto conversation.” Using the sociology of academic disciplines as a theoretical foundation, this article contributes to the manifesto conversation by (1) showing how each of the discipline’s stages of evolutionary development was shaped by one key question, (2) developing an analysis of the discipline’s stakeholders in each era, (3) identifying four key evolutionary developments in Era IV (1980–2020) that led to the discipline’s troubled trajectory, (4) showing the importance of a discipline’s mainstream central focus for developing a discipline’s sense of academic community, (5) identifying the manifesto conversation’s three major candidates for a central focus, (6) discussing whether the discipline can renew itself in Era V (2020-?), and (7) providing a tentative prognosis for such a renewal.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00238-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-022-00238-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-022-00238-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-022-00238-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
    2. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 375-389, December.
    3. Rebecca Hamilton & Linda L. Price, 2019. "Consumer journeys: developing consumer-based strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 187-191, March.
    4. Rebecca Hamilton, 2016. "Consumer-based strategy: using multiple methods to generate consumer insights that inform strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 281-285, May.
    5. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    6. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "Indigenous theory development in marketing: the foundational premises approach," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 8-17, June.
    7. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    8. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    9. A. W. Shaw, 1912. "Some Problems in Market Distribution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 26(4), pages 703-765.
    10. Manjit S. Yadav, 2020. "Reimagining marketing doctoral programs," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 56-64, June.
    11. Stephen L. Vargo, 2020. "Assessing and advancing marketing’s value propositions: a disciplinary dialog," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 149-150, December.
    12. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    13. O. C. Ferrell & Jodie Conduit & Bo Edvardsson & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "The past and future of marketing theory and practice: a tribute to the 50th anniversary of the Academy of Marketing Science," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 390-394, December.
    14. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    15. Holbrook, Morris B, 1987. "What Is Consumer Research?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(1), pages 128-132, June.
    16. Deborah J. MacInnis & Valerie S. Folkes, 2010. "The Disciplinary Status of Consumer Behavior: A Sociology of Science Perspective on Key Controversies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(6), pages 899-914, April.
    17. Preyas S. Desai & David Bell & Gary Lilien & David Soberman, 2012. "Editorial --The Science-to-Practice Initiative: Getting New Marketing Science Thinking into the Real World," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 1-3, January.
    18. Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Advancing theory in marketing: insights from conversations in other disciplines," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 73-84, June.
    19. Christina Kuehnl & Danijel Jozic & Christian Homburg, 2019. "Effective customer journey design: consumers’ conception, measurement, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 551-568, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    2. Rajan Varadarajan, 2022. "A general theory of marketing: Conceivable, elusive, or illusive," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 177-183, December.
    3. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    4. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    5. Clark, Terry & Azab, Carol & Martin Key, Thomas, 2024. "Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    7. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    2. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    3. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    4. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    5. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    6. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
    7. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    8. Stephen L. Vargo, 2022. "Fostering scholarly discussion in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 137-138, December.
    9. Hope Jensen Schau & Melissa Archpru Akaka, 2021. "From customer journeys to consumption journeys: a consumer culture approach to investigating value creation in practice-embedded consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 9-22, June.
    10. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    11. Linda D. Hollebeek & V. Kumar & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Moira K. Clark, 2023. "Moving the stakeholder journey forward," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 23-49, January.
    12. J. Joseph Cronin, 2022. "Marketing’s new myopia: Expanding the social responsibilities of marketing managers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 30-37, June.
    13. Terblanche, Nic S. & Kidd, Martin, 2021. "Exploring an in-store customer journey for customers shopping for outdoor apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.
    15. Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
    16. Murtaza Haider & Randall Shannon & George P. Moschis, 2022. "Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, March.
    17. Isadora Gasparin & Luiz Antonio Slongo, 2023. "Omnichannel as a Consumer-Based Marketing Strategy," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 220327-2203.
    18. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 375-389, December.
    19. Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00238-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.