Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114278
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020.
"Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
- Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2017. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," NBER Working Papers 23782, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Van Reenen, John & Bloom, Nicholas & Jones, Chad & Webb, Michael, 2017. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," CEPR Discussion Papers 12294, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bloom, Nicholas A. & Jones, Charles I. & Van Reenen, John & Webb, Michael, 2017. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," Research Papers repec:ecl:stabus:3592, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Michael Webb & John Van Reenen & Charles Jones & Nicholas Bloom, 2017. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," 2017 Meeting Papers 566, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Bloom, Nicholas & Jones, Charles I & Reenen, John Van & Webb, Michael, 2017. "Are ideas getting harder to find?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86588, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nicholas & Jones, Charles I & Van Reenen, John & Webb, Michael, 2020. "Are ideas getting harder to find?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Nicholas Bloom & Charles I Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2017. "Are ideas getting harder to find?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1496, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Shelby D. Hunt, 1997. "Resource-Advantage Theory: An Evolutionary Theory of Competitive Firm Behavior?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 59-78, March.
- Lawrence B. Chonko & Shelby D. Hunt, 2018. "Reflections on ethical issues in marketing management: An empirical examination," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 86-95, January.
- Shelby D. Hunt & Dennis B. Arnett, 2006. "Toward a General Theory of Marketing: Resource-Advantage Theory as an Extension of Alderson’s Theory of Market Processes," Springer Books, in: Ben Wooliscroft & Robert D. Tamilia & Stanley J. Shapiro (ed.), A Twenty-First Century Guide to Aldersonian Marketing Thought, chapter 0, pages 453-471, Springer.
- Hunt, Shelby D., 2019. "The ethics of branding, customer-brand relationships, brand-equity strategy, and branding as a societal institution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 408-416.
- Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
- Krugman, Paul R., 1979. "Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 469-479, November.
- Morgan, Robert M. & Hunt, Shelby, 1999. "Relationship-Based Competitive Advantage: The Role of Relationship Marketing in Marketing Strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 281-290, November.
- Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Sam Work & Vincent Larivière & Stefanie Haustein, 2017. "Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(9), pages 2037-2062, September.
- Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
- Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
- Hunt, Shelby D, 1991. "Positivism and Paradigm Dominance in Consumer Research: Toward Critical Pluralism and Rapproachement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 32-44, June.
- Veblen, Thorstein, 1998. "Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 22(4), pages 403-414, July.
- Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
- Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
- Shelby D. Hunt, 2018. "The philosophy of science foundations of marketing research: For scientific realism and the inductive realist models of theory status and generation," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-32, January.
- Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key, 2021. "The methodologies of the marketing literature: mechanics, uses and craft," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 416-431, December.
- Stephen L. Vargo & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, 2020. "Advancing conceptual-only articles in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, June.
- Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Pattnaik, Debidutta, 2020. "Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-14.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
- Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
- Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
- Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
- Elina Jaakkola & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Assessing and enhancing the impact potential of marketing articles," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 407-415, December.
- Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
- Cacciolatti, Luca & Lee, Soo Hee, 2016. "Revisiting the relationship between marketing capabilities and firm performance: The moderating role of market orientation, marketing strategy and organisational power," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5597-5610.
- Leigh McAlister & Frank Germann & Natalie Chisam & Pete Hayes & Adriana Lynch & Bill Stewart, 2023. "A taxonomy of marketing organizations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 617-635, May.
- J. Joseph Cronin, 2022. "Marketing’s new myopia: Expanding the social responsibilities of marketing managers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 30-37, June.
- Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
- Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.
- Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
- Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2008.
"The Skill Bias of World Trade,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(530), pages 927-960, July.
- Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2008. "The Skill Bias of World Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(530), pages 927-960, July.
- Epifani, Paolo & Gancia, Gino, 2002. "The Skill Bias of World Trade," Seminar Papers 707, Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies.
- Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2015. "The Skill Bias of World Trade," Working Papers 184, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2002. "The Skill Bias of World Trade," KITeS Working Papers 129, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Mar 2001.
- Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2004. "The skill bias of world trade," Economics Working Papers 833, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Mar 2007.
- Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2019.
"The long-run impact of new medical ideas on cancer survival and mortality,"
Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 722-740, October.
- Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2018. "The Long-run Impact of New Medical Ideas on Cancer Survival and Mortality," NBER Working Papers 25328, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Geoffrey Barrows & Hélène Ollivier & Ariell Reshef, 2023.
"Production Function Estimation with Multi-Destination Firms,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
10716, CESifo.
- Geoffrey Barrows & Hélène Ollivier & Ariell Reshef, 2024. "Production Function Estimation with Multi-Destination Firms," Working Papers hal-04378546, HAL.
- Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2020.
"International trade, quality sorting and trade costs: the case of Cognac,"
Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(3), pages 579-609, August.
- Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2017. "International Trade, Quality Sorting and Trade Costs: The Case of Cognac," Working Papers 2017-18, CEPII research center.
- Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2020. "International trade, quality sorting and trade costs: the case of Cognac," Post-Print hal-02918990, HAL.
- Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2018. "International Trade, Quality Sorting and Trade Costs: The Case of Cognac," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2018-05, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
- Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- Tybout, James R. & Westbrook, M. Daniel, 1995. "Trade liberalization and the dimensions of efficiency change in Mexican manufacturing industries," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 53-78, August.
- Wang, Shanchao & Alston, Julian M. & Pardey, Philip G., 2023. "R&D Lags in Economic Models," Staff Papers 330085, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
- repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hc03jc5h8 is not listed on IDEAS
- Mary Amiti & Jozef Konings, 2007.
"Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1611-1638, December.
- Mary Amiti & Mr. Jozef G Konings, 2005. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," IMF Working Papers 2005/146, International Monetary Fund.
- Amiti, Mary & Konings, Jozef, 2005. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," CEPR Discussion Papers 5104, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
More about this item
Keywords
Marketing’s Era V; R-A theory of competition; Marketing doctoral program reform; Marketing influence;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:170:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323006379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.