IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v12y2022i3d10.1007_s13162-022-00239-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field

Author

Listed:
  • Terry Clark

    (Southern Illinois University)

  • Thomas Martin Key

    (University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Colorado Springs)

  • Carol Azab

    (Stetson University)

Abstract

In this commentary, the authors take a thoughtful look at Shelby Hunt’s final submission to AMS Review. Building on Hunt, Madhavaram, and Hatifield’s (2022, in this issue) suggestions of how Marketing’s Era V can be re-centered on more viable and long-lasting ground as a discipline, the present authors propose that the field of marketing is, and always has been, an emergent discipline that is better served by the “invisible hand” of self-organization rather than an attempt at holistic acceptance and adoption of a central focus. Moreover, the paper drills down into one of Hunt’s recurring critiques of marketing, its doctoral programs, and makes suggestions of how this is a significant point of focus to heal our ailing discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00239-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-022-00239-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-022-00239-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-022-00239-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    2. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    3. Manjit S. Yadav, 2020. "Reimagining marketing doctoral programs," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 56-64, June.
    4. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    5. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key, 2021. "The methodologies of the marketing literature: mechanics, uses and craft," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 416-431, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clark, Terry & Azab, Carol & Martin Key, Thomas, 2024. "Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    2. Clark, Terry & Azab, Carol & Martin Key, Thomas, 2024. "Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    4. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    5. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    6. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    7. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
    8. J. Joseph Cronin, 2022. "Marketing’s new myopia: Expanding the social responsibilities of marketing managers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 30-37, June.
    9. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.
    10. Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
    11. Russell Belk, 2020. "Resurrecting marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 168-171, December.
    12. Stephen L. Vargo, 2022. "Fostering scholarly discussion in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 137-138, December.
    13. Rajan Varadarajan, 2022. "A general theory of marketing: Conceivable, elusive, or illusive," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 177-183, December.
    14. Liliana L. Bove & Thomas W. Gruen, 2023. "Lessons from the 2023 doctoral competition for conceptual articles: Identifying, nurturing, and publishing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, June.
    15. Julia A. Fehrer, 2020. "Rethinking marketing: back to purpose," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 179-184, December.
    16. Leigh McAlister & Frank Germann & Natalie Chisam & Pete Hayes & Adriana Lynch & Bill Stewart, 2023. "A taxonomy of marketing organizations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 617-635, May.
    17. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    18. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    19. Idris Bhuiya Akil & Nguyen Thi Hong, 2021. "Understanding Motivations Underlying Consumers' Social Media Usage: Implications for Digital Marketing Executives," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(4), pages 20-29.
    20. Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Relevance, rigor and impact of scholarly research in marketing, state of the discipline and outlook," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 199-205, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00239-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.