IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v12y2022i3d10.1007_s13162-022-00245-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!

Author

Listed:
  • Suvi Nenonen

    (Stockholm School of Economics)

Abstract

This commentary provides three complementary perspectives to the Hunt et al. (2022, in this issue) article “The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal.” First, the evolution of marketing as an academic discipline should be assessed also in relation to other fields. Second, it is time for an honest stocktake of the wider impact of marketing to societies and the biosphere. Third, an enduring and fruitful sense of community for marketing scholars could be found from marketing phenomena instead of the always contested theoretical perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00245-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-022-00245-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-022-00245-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-022-00245-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "Indigenous theory development in marketing: the foundational premises approach," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 8-17, June.
    2. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    3. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    4. Manjit S. Yadav, 2020. "Reimagining marketing doctoral programs," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 56-64, June.
    5. Stephen L. Vargo, 2020. "Assessing and advancing marketing’s value propositions: a disciplinary dialog," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 149-150, December.
    6. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    7. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    8. Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Advancing theory in marketing: insights from conversations in other disciplines," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 73-84, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    2. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    3. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    4. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
    5. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    6. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    7. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    8. Clark, Terry & Azab, Carol & Martin Key, Thomas, 2024. "Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.
    10. Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
    11. J. Joseph Cronin, 2022. "Marketing’s new myopia: Expanding the social responsibilities of marketing managers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 30-37, June.
    12. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 375-389, December.
    13. Stephen L. Vargo, 2022. "Fostering scholarly discussion in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 137-138, December.
    14. Rajan Varadarajan, 2022. "A general theory of marketing: Conceivable, elusive, or illusive," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 177-183, December.
    15. Murtaza Haider & Randall Shannon & George P. Moschis, 2022. "Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, March.
    16. Russell Belk, 2020. "Resurrecting marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 168-171, December.
    17. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    18. Barry J. Babin & Julie Guidry Moulard & Jay D. Lindquist, 2021. "A bridge to relevance: on the history of the Academy of Marketing Science® (AMS)," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 454-463, December.
    19. Idris Bhuiya Akil & Nguyen Thi Hong, 2021. "Understanding Motivations Underlying Consumers' Social Media Usage: Implications for Digital Marketing Executives," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(4), pages 20-29.
    20. Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Relevance, rigor and impact of scholarly research in marketing, state of the discipline and outlook," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 199-205, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00245-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.