IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221120169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-Related Use of Information and Communication Technologies After Hours (W_ICTs) and Work-Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Haixia Wang
  • Pei Liu
  • Xiaoying Zhao
  • Aimei Li
  • Chenjie Xiao

Abstract

Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours (W_ICTs) has significant impacts on both organizations and individuals. However, limited research has explored the detrimental effects of W_ICTs behavior on work-family conflict. To fill this gap, based upon the job demands-resources (JD-R) model and daily diary design with a multilevel model method, we collected 76 employees who completed a 5-day investigation, resulting in 380 observations. Our study found that engaging in W_ICTs behavior positively influenced employees’ own work role overload, which led to an increase in work-family conflict. Furthermore, we found that the positive relationship between work role overload and work-family conflict is stronger when employees’ job autonomy is at lower levels. Our findings provide strong support for the proposed moderated mediation model and extend our understanding of W_ICTs behaviors consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Haixia Wang & Pei Liu & Xiaoying Zhao & Aimei Li & Chenjie Xiao, 2022. "Work-Related Use of Information and Communication Technologies After Hours (W_ICTs) and Work-Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221120169
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221120169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221120169
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221120169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turgut Karakose & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis, 2021. "Exploring the Interrelationship between COVID-19 Phobia, Work–Family Conflict, Family–Work Conflict, and Life Satisfaction among School Administrators for Advancing Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Emily I.M. Collins & Anna L. Cox & Ruby Wootton, 2015. "Out of Work, Out of Mind?: Smartphone Use and Work-Life Boundaries," International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 67-77, July.
    3. Stephen R. Barley & Debra E. Meyerson & Stine Grodal, 2011. "E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 887-906, August.
    4. Muhammad Rafiq & Tachia Chin, 2019. "Three-Way Interaction Effect of Job Insecurity, Job Embeddedness and Career Stage on Life Satisfaction in A Digital Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Lanaj, Klodiana & Johnson, Russell E. & Barnes, Christopher M., 2014. "Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 11-23.
    6. Judy Wajcman & Emily Rose & Judith E. Brown & Michael Bittman, 2010. "Enacting virtual connections between work and home," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Shin, Yuhyung & Hur, Won-Moo, 2019. "Linking flight attendants’ job crafting and OCB from a JD-R perspective: A daily analysis of the mediation of job resources and demands," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Cláudia Andrade & Eva Petiz Lousã, 2021. "Telework and Work–Family Conflict during COVID-19 Lockdown in Portugal: The Influence of Job-Related Factors," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gajendran, Ravi S. & Loewenstein, Jeffrey & Choi, Hyeran & Ozgen, Sibel, 2022. "Hidden costs of text-based electronic communication on complex reasoning tasks: Motivation maintenance and impaired downstream performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Xia Jiang & Jing Du & Tianfei Yang & Jinfan Zhou, 2021. "Sustainable Interpersonal Interaction: Research on Instant Message and Helping from the Perspective of Sender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    4. Christensen, Peter Holdt & Foss, Nicolai J., 2021. "Present-but-online: How mobile devices may harm purposeful co-presence in organizations (and what can be done about it)," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 84-94.
    5. Szennay, Áron & Radácsi, László & Timár, Gigi, 2021. "Szabadúszók Magyarországon. Egy új kutatási program elméleti háttere és első empirikus eredményei [Freelancers in Hungary: the theoretical background and initial empirical results of a new research," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(S11), pages 78-106.
    6. Johanna Edvinsson & Svend Erik Mathiassen & Sofie Bjärntoft & Helena Jahncke & Terry Hartig & David M. Hallman, 2022. "A Work Time Control Tradeoff in Flexible Work: Competitive Pathways to Need for Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Nathalie Greenan & Jean-Claude Sardas & Pascal Ughetto, 2020. "Organising the disconnection? Intense work and articulation of times and spaces in the design activities of an automotive company [Organiser la déconnexion ? Travail intense et articulation des tem," Post-Print halshs-03145158, HAL.
    8. Xia Jiang & Jing Du & Tianfei Yang & Yujing Liu, 2021. "How Do Instant Messages Reduce Psychological Withdrawal Behaviors?—Mediation of Engagement and Moderation of Self-Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Jeffrey, Stephen & Diller, Heike & Fiedler, Marina, 2016. "How does intensification and mobile rearrangement affect employee commitment," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe B-23-16, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    10. Jean-François Stich & Samuel Farley & Cary Cooper & Monideepa Tarafdar, 2015. "Information and Communication Technology Demands: Outcomes and Interventions," Post-Print hal-01507888, HAL.
    11. Anthony Silard & Mary Beth Watson-Manheim & Nuno Jose Lopes, 2023. "The influence of text-based technology-mediated communication on the connection quality of workplace relationships: the mediating role of emotional labor," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 2035-2053, August.
    12. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, 2019. "Is Employee Technological “Ill-Being” Missing from Corporate Responsibility? The Foucauldian Ethics of Ubiquitous IT Uses in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 339-361, December.
    13. Shanshan Zhang & Fengchun Huang & Yuting Zhang & Qiwen Li, 2023. "A Person-Environment Fit Model to Explain Information and Communication Technologies-Enabled After-Hours Work-Related Interruptions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    15. Killian Mullan & Judy Wajcman, 2019. "Have Mobile Devices Changed Working Patterns in the 21st Century? A Time-diary Analysis of Work Extension in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(1), pages 3-20, February.
    16. Zhang, Linlin & Tekleab, Amanuel G. & Piszczek, Matthew & Qiu, Yang, 2023. "Does after-hours work-related information and communication technology use promote work engagement? A preliminary daily Dairy study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Susan V. Scott, 2014. "What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 868-891, June.
    18. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    19. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    20. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221120169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.