IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v77y2024i5p685-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Social Dialogues: Shaping EU Social Policy through Parental Leave Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Jie Im
  • Trine Pernille Larsen
  • Brigitte Pircher

Abstract

The European Social Dialogue (ESD) has served as the platform for European social partners to negotiate parental leave policies at the European Union (EU) level since 1995. The partners’ efforts to revise the regulations in 2015, in response to the European Commission’s broader approach toward European work–life balance policies, failed, however, and the reasons for and implications of this failure remain insufficiently explored. Drawing on existing ESD literature and leveraging the regulator-intermediary-target (RIT) model, the authors develop a typology of policymaking outcomes based on the analysis of three parental leave directives from 1996 to 2019. The findings demonstrate that divergent preferences among European social partners, particularly when juxtaposed against the Commission’s policy objectives and interests, reduced the probability of a successful ESD through which European social partners could generate a framework agreement. Instead of being rule-makers, these conditions relegated European social partners to the role of rule-takers. If this trend continues, it poses a significant challenge to the role and influence of European social partners in EU policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Jie Im & Trine Pernille Larsen & Brigitte Pircher, 2024. "European Social Dialogues: Shaping EU Social Policy through Parental Leave Rights," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 685-715, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:77:y:2024:i:5:p:685-715
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939241231789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939241231789
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939241231789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:77:y:2024:i:5:p:685-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.