IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v11y2005i3p313-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sectoral social dialogue? A quantitative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Pochet

    (Observatoire social européen)

Abstract

Recent studies of the sectoral social dialogue have concluded that the types of documents adopted by the sectoral social partners are undergoing a qualitative change. It appears that significant developments are underway which need to be better understood and analysed. Any such exercise poses two challenges: one quantitative, since there are no standardised data concerning texts signed, and the other qualitative, relating to the precise nature of the texts adopted. How should they be described? How should they be classified? This article presents the results of a quantitative analysis, based on a database created at the Observatoire social européen covering all 353 agreements adopted since 1978. From this analysis we can already detect certain overall trends affecting the sectoral social dialogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Pochet, 2005. "Sectoral social dialogue? A quantitative analysis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 313-332, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:313-332
    DOI: 10.1177/102425890501100304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425890501100304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425890501100304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Bandasz, 2014. "A framework agreement in the hairdressing sector," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(4), pages 505-520, November.
    2. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    3. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:313-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.