IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v16y2015i6p1025-1060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrelationship between Total Quality Management and Six Sigma: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Vishal Singh Patyal
  • K. Maddulety

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the dimensions of total quality management (TQM) and Six Sigma methodology through an extensive literature review and to understand the similarities and differences between the two. The present study identified a set of 13 TQM and 11 Six Sigma practices. The authors also compared the two methodologies with respect to their mutual similarities and differences. Though a considerable number of studies are available on TQM and Six Sigma individually, only limited literature is available regarding their integration. This study systematically reviews and reports about a set of 36 and 31 scholarly articles for TQM and Six Sigma, respectively. Only a few authors (such as, Revere & Black, 2003; Yang, 2004; Zu, Fredendall & Douglas, 2008) have focused on the integration perspective of TQM and Six Sigma. The literature survey revealed that TQM and Six Sigma are two different concepts that share similarities, but also have significant disparities. Six Sigma emerges as significantly superior to TQM in some aspects. However, both TQM and Six Sigma should be integrated to produce a synergistic effect on quality performance, which, in turn, may increase business performance. The outcome of this study will help provide a better understanding of the identified TQM and Six Sigma philosophies that will help managers and future researchers understand effective implementation of quality management strategies in improving business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vishal Singh Patyal & K. Maddulety, 2015. "Interrelationship between Total Quality Management and Six Sigma: A Review," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 1025-1060, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:16:y:2015:i:6:p:1025-1060
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150915597607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150915597607
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150915597607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forza, Cipriano & Filippini, Roberto, 1998. "TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Kingshuk K. Sinha & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 2005. "Designing Work Within and Between Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 389-408, August.
    3. Bell, Robert R. & Burnham, John M., 1989. "The paradox of manufacturing productivity and innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 58-64.
    4. R. Handfield & Jayanth Jayaram & S. Ghosh, 1999. "An empirical examination of quality tool deployment patterns and their impact on performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 1403-1426, April.
    5. Sadikoglu, Esin & Zehir, Cemal, 2010. "Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 13-26, September.
    6. Gunday, Gurhan & Ulusoy, Gunduz & Kilic, Kemal & Alpkan, Lutfihak, 2011. "Effects of innovation types on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 662-676, October.
    7. Phan, Anh Chi & Abdallah, Ayman Bahjat & Matsui, Yoshiki, 2011. "Quality management practices and competitive performance: Empirical evidence from Japanese manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 518-529, October.
    8. Darshak A. Desai & Jiju Antony & M.B. Patel, 2012. "An assessment of the critical success factors for Six Sigma implementation in Indian industries," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 426-444, April.
    9. Brun, Alessandro, 2011. "Critical success factors of Six Sigma implementations in Italian companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 158-164, May.
    10. Adrian S. Choo & Kevin W. Linderman & Roger G. Schroeder, 2007. "Method and Psychological Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Quality Improvement Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 437-450, March.
    11. Prajogo, Daniel I. & Sohal, Amrik S., 2006. "The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 296-312, June.
    12. Roland Caulcutt, 2001. "Why is Six Sigma so successful?," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3-4), pages 301-306.
    13. Zu, Xingxing & Robbins, Tina L. & Fredendall, Lawrence D., 2010. "Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 86-106, January.
    14. Salaheldin Ismail Salaheldin, 2009. "Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 215-237, March.
    15. W. Edwards Deming, 2000. "The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541165, April.
    16. Bayo-Moriones, Alberto & Merino-Díaz-de-Cerio, Javier & Antonio Escamilla-de-León, Sergio & Mary Selvam, Rejina, 2011. "The impact of ISO 9000 and EFQM on the use of flexible work practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 33-42, March.
    17. Tari, Juan Jose & Molina, Jose Francisco & Castejon, Juan Luis, 2007. "The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 483-501, December.
    18. Ho, Ying-Chin & Chang, Ou-Chuan & Wang, Wen-Bo, 2008. "An empirical study of key success factors for Six Sigma Green Belt projects at an Asian MRO company," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 263-269.
    19. Faisal Talib & Zillur Rahman & M.N. Qureshi, 2011. "A study of total quality management and supply chain management practices," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(3), pages 268-288, March.
    20. Keng-Boon Ooi & Weng-Choong Cheah & Binshan Lin & Pei-Lee Teh, 2012. "TQM practices and knowledge sharing: An empirical study of Malaysia’s manufacturing organizations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 59-78, March.
    21. Konecny, Philipp A. & Thun, Jörn-Henrik, 2011. "Do it separately or simultaneously--An empirical analysis of a conjoint implementation of TQM and TPM on plant performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 496-507, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laith Walid Fatafta & Shaker Habis Nawafleh & Heba Eid Al Darwaish, 2019. "Reviewing the Mediating Role of Quality Management Capabilities on the Effect of Information Technology on Organizational Performance," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 7(3), pages 234-251, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Dabestani & Allahvirdi Taghavi & Mohammad Saljoughian, 2014. "The Relationship between Total Quality Management Critical Success Factors and Knowledge Sharing in a Service Industry," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(1), pages 81-101, February.
    2. Singh, Vedant & Kumar, Akshay & Singh, Tej, 2018. "Impact of TQM on organisational performance: The case of Indian manufacturing and service industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 199-217.
    3. Rana Basu & Prabha Bhola, 2015. "Exploring Quality Management Practices and Its Pattern Analysis in Indian Service SMEs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 199-235, June.
    4. Minh Hue Nguyen & Anh Chi Phan & Yoshiki Matsui, 2018. "Contribution of Quality Management Practices to Sustainability Performance of Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, January.
    5. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    6. Oluwaseun Niyi Anifowose & Matina Ghasemi & Banji Rildwan Olaleye, 2022. "Total Quality Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation Speed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. L. M. Daphne Yiu & Hugo K. S. Lam & Andy C. L. Yeung & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Enhancing the Financial Returns of R&D Investments through Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1658-1678, July.
    8. Valmohammadi, Changiz & Roshanzamir, Shervin, 2015. "The guidelines of improvement: Relations among organizational culture, TQM and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 167-178.
    9. Younès El Manzani & Mostapha El Idrissi & Zakaria Lissaneddine, 2022. "Soft quality management practices and product innovation ambidexterity: the mediating role of market orientation ambidexterity," Post-Print hal-04317941, HAL.
    10. Marco Maciel-Monteon & Jorge Limon-Romero & Carlos Gastelum-Acosta & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Diego Tlapa & Manuel Iván Rodríguez Borbón, 2020. "Improvement project in higher education institutions: A BPEP-based model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Giner Alor-Hernández & Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Juan I. Latorre-Biel, 2018. "Mediating Role of the Six Sigma Implementation Strategy and Investment in Human Resources in Economic Success and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Hong, Jiangtao & Liao, Yi & Zhang, Yibin & Yu, Zhefu, 2019. "The effect of supply chain quality management practices and capabilities on operational and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 227-235.
    13. Naveed Mushtaq & Wong Wai Peng, 2020. "Can TQM Act as Stimulus to Elevate Firms’ Innovation Performance?: An Empirical Evidence From the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    14. Escrig, Ana B. & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2015. "What characterizes leading companies within business excellence models? An analysis of “EFQM Recognized for Excellence” recipients in Spain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 362-375.
    15. Zeng, Jing & Anh Phan, Chi & Matsui, Yoshiki, 2015. "The impact of hard and soft quality management on quality and innovation performance: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 216-226.
    16. Arumugam, V. & Antony, Jiju & Kumar, Maneesh, 2013. "Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 388-402.
    17. Zeng, Jing & Zhang, Wenqing & Matsui, Yoshiki & Zhao, Xiande, 2017. "The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 240-251.
    18. Sachin Modgil & Sanjay Sharma, 2017. "Information Systems, Supply Chain Management and Operational Performance: Tri-linkage—An Exploratory Study on Pharmaceutical Industry of India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3), pages 652-677, June.
    19. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Ľubica Simanová & Andrea Sujová, 2022. "The Impact of Continuous Improvement Concepts on the Performance of Furniture Production Processes," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 111-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:16:y:2015:i:6:p:1025-1060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.