IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Invariant neural responses for sensory categories revealed by the time-varying information for communication calls

Author

Listed:
  • Julie E Elie
  • Frédéric E Theunissen

Abstract

Although information theoretic approaches have been used extensively in the analysis of the neural code, they have yet to be used to describe how information is accumulated in time while sensory systems are categorizing dynamic sensory stimuli such as speech sounds or visual objects. Here, we present a novel method to estimate the cumulative information for stimuli or categories. We further define a time-varying categorical information index that, by comparing the information obtained for stimuli versus categories of these same stimuli, quantifies invariant neural representations. We use these methods to investigate the dynamic properties of avian cortical auditory neurons recorded in zebra finches that were listening to a large set of call stimuli sampled from the complete vocal repertoire of this species. We found that the time-varying rates carry 5 times more information than the mean firing rates even in the first 100 ms. We also found that cumulative information has slow time constants (100–600 ms) relative to the typical integration time of single neurons, reflecting the fact that the behaviorally informative features of auditory objects are time-varying sound patterns. When we correlated firing rates and information values, we found that average information correlates with average firing rate but that higher-rates found at the onset response yielded similar information values as the lower-rates found in the sustained response: the onset and sustained response of avian cortical auditory neurons provide similar levels of independent information about call identity and call-type. Finally, our information measures allowed us to rigorously define categorical neurons; these categorical neurons show a high degree of invariance for vocalizations within a call-type. Peak invariance is found around 150 ms after stimulus onset. Surprisingly, call-type invariant neurons were found in both primary and secondary avian auditory areas.Author summary: Just as the recognition of faces requires neural representations that are invariant to scale and rotation, the recognition of behaviorally relevant auditory objects, such as spoken words, requires neural representations that are invariant to the speaker uttering the word and to his or her location. Here, we used information theory to investigate the time course of the neural representation of bird communication calls and of behaviorally relevant categories of these same calls: the call-types of the bird’s repertoire. We found that neurons in both the primary and secondary avian auditory cortex exhibit invariant responses to call renditions within a call-type, suggestive of a potential role for extracting the meaning of these communication calls. We also found that time plays an important role: first, neural responses carry significantly more information when represented by temporal patterns calculated at the small time scale of 10 ms than when measured as average rates and, second, this information accumulates in a non-redundant fashion up to long integration times of 600 ms. This rich temporal neural representation is matched to the temporal richness found in the communication calls of this species.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie E Elie & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2019. "Invariant neural responses for sensory categories revealed by the time-varying information for communication calls," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-43, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006698
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006698
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006698&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen M. Town & Katherine C. Wood & Jennifer K. Bizley, 2018. "Sound identity is represented robustly in auditory cortex during perceptual constancy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Israel Nelken & Yaron Rotman & Omer Bar Yosef, 1999. "Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6715), pages 154-157, January.
    4. Xiaoqin Wang & Thomas Lu & Ross K. Snider & Li Liang, 2005. "Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7040), pages 341-346, May.
    5. Julie E. Elie & Frédéric E. Theunissen, 2018. "Zebra finches identify individuals using vocal signatures unique to each call type," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. R Channing Moore & Tyler Lee & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2013. "Noise-invariant Neurons in the Avian Auditory Cortex: Hearing the Song in Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Zane N Aldworth & Alexander G Dimitrov & Graham I Cummins & Tomáš Gedeon & John P Miller, 2011. "Temporal Encoding in a Nervous System," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Wensheng Sun & Dennis L Barbour, 2017. "Rate, not selectivity, determines neuronal population coding accuracy in auditory cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Michael A Carlin & Mounya Elhilali, 2013. "Sustained Firing of Model Central Auditory Neurons Yields a Discriminative Spectro-temporal Representation for Natural Sounds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Lanlan Ma & Xuhui Tai & Liye Su & Lijuan Shi & Enhua Wang & Ling Qin, 2013. "The Neuronal Responses to Repetitive Acoustic Pulses in Different Fields of the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Jacob N Oppenheim & Pavel Isakov & Marcelo O Magnasco, 2013. "Degraded Time-Frequency Acuity to Time-Reversed Notes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-6, June.
    7. Alexander B Neiman & David F Russell & Michael H Rowe, 2011. "Identifying Temporal Codes in Spontaneously Active Sensory Neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-13, November.
    8. A Ivanenko & P Watkins & M A J van Gerven & K Hammerschmidt & B Englitz, 2020. "Classifying sex and strain from mouse ultrasonic vocalizations using deep learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Tim Sainburg & Marvin Thielk & Timothy Q Gentner, 2020. "Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-48, October.
    10. Roohollah Massoudi & Marc M Van Wanrooij & Huib Versnel & A John Van Opstal, 2015. "Spectrotemporal Response Properties of Core Auditory Cortex Neurons in Awake Monkey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    11. Nihaad Paraouty & Justin D. Yao & Léo Varnet & Chi-Ning Chou & SueYeon Chung & Dan H. Sanes, 2023. "Sensory cortex plasticity supports auditory social learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Daniel Bendor, 2015. "The Role of Inhibition in a Computational Model of an Auditory Cortical Neuron during the Encoding of Temporal Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Clara Suied & Isabelle Viaud-Delmon, 2009. "Auditory-Visual Object Recognition Time Suggests Specific Processing for Animal Sounds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-9, April.
    14. Lingyun Zhao & Li Zhaoping, 2011. "Understanding Auditory Spectro-Temporal Receptive Fields and Their Changes with Input Statistics by Efficient Coding Principles," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Laurence Aitchison & Máté Lengyel, 2016. "The Hamiltonian Brain: Efficient Probabilistic Inference with Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Circuit Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Mina Sadeghi & Xiu Zhai & Ian H Stevenson & Monty A Escabí, 2019. "A neural ensemble correlation code for sound category identification," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-41, October.
    17. Klaus Wimmer & K Jannis Hildebrandt & R Matthias Hennig & Klaus Obermayer, 2008. "Adaptation and Selective Information Transmission in the Cricket Auditory Neuron AN2," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.