IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coexistence of Lateral and Co-Tuned Inhibitory Configurations in Cortical Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Robert B Levy
  • Alex D Reyes

Abstract

The responses of neurons in sensory cortex depend on the summation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. How the excitatory and inhibitory inputs scale with stimulus depends on the network architecture, which ranges from the lateral inhibitory configuration where excitatory inputs are more narrowly tuned than inhibitory inputs, to the co-tuned configuration where both are tuned equally. The underlying circuitry that gives rise to lateral inhibition and co-tuning is yet unclear. Using large-scale network simulations with experimentally determined connectivity patterns and simulations with rate models, we show that the spatial extent of the input determined the configuration: there was a smooth transition from lateral inhibition with narrow input to co-tuning with broad input. The transition from lateral inhibition to co-tuning was accompanied by shifts in overall gain (reduced), output firing pattern (from tonic to phasic) and rate-level functions (from non-monotonic to monotonically increasing). The results suggest that a single cortical network architecture could account for the extended range of experimentally observed response types between the extremes of lateral inhibitory versus co-tuned configurations. Author Summary: The cerebral cortex contains a network of electrically active cells (neurons) interconnected by synapses, which may be excitatory (tending to increase activity) or inhibitory. Network activity, i.e., the ensemble of activity patterns of the individual cells, is driven by input from the sense organs, and creates an internal representation of features of the outside world. In auditory cortex, sound frequency (pitch) is encoded by the physical location of activity in the network. Thus, connections among cells at various distances may blur or sharpen the frequency representation. Recent work in living animals has yielded conflicting results: sharpening of responses via lateral inhibition in some cases, versus balanced excitation and inhibition (co-tuning) in others. It was previously unknown whether a single cortical network architecture could account for this spectrum of findings. Here, computer simulations based on experimental data reveal that this is indeed the case. Varying input to the network causes smooth transitions between lateral inhibition and co-tuning, accompanied by changes in the strength and timing of the responses. Diverse input-dependent response patterns in a single network may be a general mechanism enabling the brain to process a wide range of sensory information under various conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert B Levy & Alex D Reyes, 2011. "Coexistence of Lateral and Co-Tuned Inhibitory Configurations in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002161
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002161&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anja L. Dorrn & Kexin Yuan & Alison J. Barker & Christoph E. Schreiner & Robert C. Froemke, 2010. "Developmental sensory experience balances cortical excitation and inhibition," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7300), pages 932-936, June.
    2. Michael Wehr & Anthony M. Zador, 2003. "Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6965), pages 442-446, November.
    3. Yujiao J. Sun & Guangying K. Wu & Bao-hua Liu & Pingyang Li & Mu Zhou & Zhongju Xiao & Huizhong W. Tao & Li I. Zhang, 2010. "Fine-tuning of pre-balanced excitation and inhibition during auditory cortical development," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7300), pages 927-931, June.
    4. Mario Galarreta & Shaul Hestrin, 1999. "A network of fast-spiking cells in the neocortex connected by electrical synapses," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6757), pages 72-75, November.
    5. Solange P. Brown & Shaul Hestrin, 2009. "Intracortical circuits of pyramidal neurons reflect their long-range axonal targets," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7233), pages 1133-1136, February.
    6. Xiaoqin Wang & Thomas Lu & Ross K. Snider & Li Liang, 2005. "Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7040), pages 341-346, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James M McFarland & Yuwei Cui & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Daniel Bendor, 2015. "The Role of Inhibition in a Computational Model of an Auditory Cortical Neuron during the Encoding of Temporal Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Irina Pochinok & Tristan M. Stöber & Jochen Triesch & Mattia Chini & Ileana L. Hanganu-Opatz, 2024. "A developmental increase of inhibition promotes the emergence of hippocampal ripples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. David Pérez-González & Olga Hernández & Ellen Covey & Manuel S Malmierca, 2012. "GABAA-Mediated Inhibition Modulates Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Wensheng Sun & Dennis L Barbour, 2017. "Rate, not selectivity, determines neuronal population coding accuracy in auditory cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Michael A Carlin & Mounya Elhilali, 2013. "Sustained Firing of Model Central Auditory Neurons Yields a Discriminative Spectro-temporal Representation for Natural Sounds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Yoav Printz & Pritish Patil & Mathias Mahn & Asaf Benjamin & Anna Litvin & Rivka Levy & Max Bringmann & Ofer Yizhar, 2023. "Determinants of functional synaptic connectivity among amygdala-projecting prefrontal cortical neurons in male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Yilmaz, Ergin, 2014. "Impacts of hybrid synapses on the noise-delayed decay in scale-free neural networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-8.
    12. Lanlan Ma & Xuhui Tai & Liye Su & Lijuan Shi & Enhua Wang & Ling Qin, 2013. "The Neuronal Responses to Repetitive Acoustic Pulses in Different Fields of the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    13. Manoj Kumar & Gregory Handy & Stylianos Kouvaros & Yanjun Zhao & Lovisa Ljungqvist Brinson & Eric Wei & Brandon Bizup & Brent Doiron & Thanos Tzounopoulos, 2023. "Cell-type-specific plasticity of inhibitory interneurons in the rehabilitation of auditory cortex after peripheral damage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Avner Wallach & Danny Eytan & Shimon Marom & Ron Meir, 2008. "Selective Adaptation in Networks of Heterogeneous Populations: Model, Simulation, and Experiment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Wang, Jing & Liu, Shenquan & Liu, Xuanliang, 2014. "Quantification of synchronization phenomena in two reciprocally gap-junction coupled bursting pancreatic β-cells," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 65-71.
    16. Mizusaki, Beatriz E.P. & Agnes, Everton J. & Erichsen, Rubem & Brunnet, Leonardo G., 2017. "Learning and retrieval behavior in recurrent neural networks with pre-synaptic dependent homeostatic plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 279-286.
    17. Alon Poleg-Polsky & Jeffrey S Diamond, 2011. "Imperfect Space Clamp Permits Electrotonic Interactions between Inhibitory and Excitatory Synaptic Conductances, Distorting Voltage Clamp Recordings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Julie E Elie & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2019. "Invariant neural responses for sensory categories revealed by the time-varying information for communication calls," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-43, September.
    19. Vladimir V Klinshov & Jun-nosuke Teramae & Vladimir I Nekorkin & Tomoki Fukai, 2014. "Dense Neuron Clustering Explains Connectivity Statistics in Cortical Microcircuits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Panagiotis Fotiadis & Matthew Cieslak & Xiaosong He & Lorenzo Caciagli & Mathieu Ouellet & Theodore D. Satterthwaite & Russell T. Shinohara & Dani S. Bassett, 2023. "Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.