IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classifying sex and strain from mouse ultrasonic vocalizations using deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • A Ivanenko
  • P Watkins
  • M A J van Gerven
  • K Hammerschmidt
  • B Englitz

Abstract

Vocalizations are widely used for communication between animals. Mice use a large repertoire of ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in different social contexts. During social interaction recognizing the partner's sex is important, however, previous research remained inconclusive whether individual USVs contain this information. Using deep neural networks (DNNs) to classify the sex of the emitting mouse from the spectrogram we obtain unprecedented performance (77%, vs. SVM: 56%, Regression: 51%). Performance was even higher (85%) if the DNN could also use each mouse's individual properties during training, which may, however, be of limited practical value. Splitting estimation into two DNNs and using 24 extracted features per USV, spectrogram-to-features and features-to-sex (60%) failed to reach single-step performance. Extending the features by each USVs spectral line, frequency and time marginal in a semi-convolutional DNN resulted in a performance mid-way (64%). Analyzing the network structure suggests an increase in sparsity of activation and correlation with sex, specifically in the fully-connected layers. A detailed analysis of the USV structure, reveals a subset of male vocalizations characterized by a few acoustic features, while the majority of sex differences appear to rely on a complex combination of many features. The same network architecture was also able to achieve above-chance classification for cortexless mice, which were considered indistinguishable before. In summary, spectrotemporal differences between male and female USVs allow at least their partial classification, which enables sexual recognition between mice and automated attribution of USVs during analysis of social interactions.Author summary: Many animals communicate by producing sounds, so-called vocalizations. Mice use many different kinds of vocalizations in different social contexts. During social interaction recognizing the partner's sex is important and female mice appear to know the difference between male and female vocalizations. However, previous research had suggested that male and female vocalizations are very similar. We here show for the first time that the emitter's sex can be guessed from the vocalization alone, even single ones. The full spectrogram was the best basis for this, while reduced representations (e.g. basic properties of the vocalization) were less informative. We therefore conclude that while the information about the emitter's sex is present in the vocalization, both mice and our analysis must rely on complex properties to determine it. This novel insight is enabled by the use of recent machine learning techniques. In contrast, we show directly that a number of more basic techniques fail in this challenge. In summary, differences in the vocalizations between male and female mice allow to guess the emitter's sex, which enables sexual recognition between mice and automated analysis. This is important in studying social interactions between mice and how speech is produced and analyzed in the brain.

Suggested Citation

  • A Ivanenko & P Watkins & M A J van Gerven & K Hammerschmidt & B Englitz, 2020. "Classifying sex and strain from mouse ultrasonic vocalizations using deep learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007918
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007918
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007918&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah M Zala & Doris Reitschmidt & Anton Noll & Peter Balazs & Dustin J Penn, 2017. "Sex-dependent modulation of ultrasonic vocalizations in house mice (Mus musculus musculus)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Timothy E Holy & Zhongsheng Guo, 2005. "Ultrasonic Songs of Male Mice," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-1, November.
    3. Asa Ben-Hur & Cheng Soon Ong & Sören Sonnenburg & Bernhard Schölkopf & Gunnar Rätsch, 2008. "Support Vector Machines and Kernels for Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    4. Julie E. Elie & Frédéric E. Theunissen, 2018. "Zebra finches identify individuals using vocal signatures unique to each call type," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregg A Castellucci & Daniel Calbick & David McCormick, 2018. "The temporal organization of mouse ultrasonic vocalizations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-40, October.
    2. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Sarah M Zala & Doris Reitschmidt & Anton Noll & Peter Balazs & Dustin J Penn, 2017. "Sex-dependent modulation of ultrasonic vocalizations in house mice (Mus musculus musculus)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Alaa Tharwat & Aboul Ella Hassanien, 2019. "Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization for Parameter Optimization of Support Vector Machine," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(3), pages 576-598, October.
    5. Emily S W Wong & Margaret C Hardy & David Wood & Timothy Bailey & Glenn F King, 2013. "SVM-Based Prediction of Propeptide Cleavage Sites in Spider Toxins Identifies Toxin Innovation in an Australian Tarantula," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Lior Shamir & John D Delaney & Nikita Orlov & D Mark Eckley & Ilya G Goldberg, 2010. "Pattern Recognition Software and Techniques for Biological Image Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-10, November.
    7. Kay H Brodersen & Thomas M Schofield & Alexander P Leff & Cheng Soon Ong & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Joachim M Buhmann & Klaas E Stephan, 2011. "Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Shweta Bhandare & Debra S Goldberg & Robin Dowell, 2017. "Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Marika Premoli & Daniele Baggi & Marco Bianchetti & Alessandro Gnutti & Marco Bondaschi & Andrea Mastinu & Pierangelo Migliorati & Alberto Signoroni & Riccardo Leonardi & Maurizio Memo & Sara Anna Bon, 2021. "Automatic classification of mice vocalizations using Machine Learning techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Julie E Elie & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2019. "Invariant neural responses for sensory categories revealed by the time-varying information for communication calls," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-43, September.
    11. Wei Shui & Yiyi Zhang & Xinggui Wang & Yuanmeng Liu & Qianfeng Wang & Fei Duan & Chaowei Wu & Wanyu Shui, 2022. "Does Tibetan Household Livelihood Capital Enhance Tourism Participation Sustainability? Evidence from China’s Jiaju Tibetan Village," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Marina M -C Vidovic & Nico Görnitz & Klaus-Robert Müller & Gunnar Rätsch & Marius Kloft, 2015. "SVM2Motif—Reconstructing Overlapping DNA Sequence Motifs by Mimicking an SVM Predictor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Christopher C Lapish & Jeremy K Seamans & Daniel Durstewitz, 2011. "Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Yue Deng & Yanyu Zhao & Yebin Liu & Qionghai Dai, 2013. "Differences Help Recognition: A Probabilistic Interpretation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Charlotte Soneson & Sarah Gerster & Mauro Delorenzi, 2014. "Batch Effect Confounding Leads to Strong Bias in Performance Estimates Obtained by Cross-Validation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Igor O Korolev & Laura L Symonds & Andrea C Bozoki & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2016. "Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Dementia Using Clinical, MRI, and Plasma Biomarkers via Probabilistic Pattern Classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Stephen J Gilmore, 2018. "Automated decision support in melanocytic lesion management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Juan A G Ranea & Ian Morilla & Jon G Lees & Adam J Reid & Corin Yeats & Andrew B Clegg & Francisca Sanchez-Jimenez & Christine Orengo, 2010. "Finding the “Dark Matter” in Human and Yeast Protein Network Prediction and Modelling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Tim Sainburg & Marvin Thielk & Timothy Q Gentner, 2020. "Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-48, October.
    20. S. Camelo & M. González-Lima & A. Quiroz, 2015. "Nearest neighbors methods for support vector machines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 85-101, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.