IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitri Yatsenko
  • Krešimir Josić
  • Alexander S Ecker
  • Emmanouil Froudarakis
  • R James Cotton
  • Andreas S Tolias

Abstract

Ambitious projects aim to record the activity of ever larger and denser neuronal populations in vivo. Correlations in neural activity measured in such recordings can reveal important aspects of neural circuit organization. However, estimating and interpreting large correlation matrices is statistically challenging. Estimation can be improved by regularization, i.e. by imposing a structure on the estimate. The amount of improvement depends on how closely the assumed structure represents dependencies in the data. Therefore, the selection of the most efficient correlation matrix estimator for a given neural circuit must be determined empirically. Importantly, the identity and structure of the most efficient estimator informs about the types of dominant dependencies governing the system. We sought statistically efficient estimators of neural correlation matrices in recordings from large, dense groups of cortical neurons. Using fast 3D random-access laser scanning microscopy of calcium signals, we recorded the activity of nearly every neuron in volumes 200 μm wide and 100 μm deep (150–350 cells) in mouse visual cortex. We hypothesized that in these densely sampled recordings, the correlation matrix should be best modeled as the combination of a sparse graph of pairwise partial correlations representing local interactions and a low-rank component representing common fluctuations and external inputs. Indeed, in cross-validation tests, the covariance matrix estimator with this structure consistently outperformed other regularized estimators. The sparse component of the estimate defined a graph of interactions. These interactions reflected the physical distances and orientation tuning properties of cells: The density of positive ‘excitatory’ interactions decreased rapidly with geometric distances and with differences in orientation preference whereas negative ‘inhibitory’ interactions were less selective. Because of its superior performance, this ‘sparse+latent’ estimator likely provides a more physiologically relevant representation of the functional connectivity in densely sampled recordings than the sample correlation matrix.Author Summary: It is now possible to record the spiking activity of hundreds of neurons at the same time. A meaningful statistical description of the collective activity of these neural populations—their ‘functional connectivity’—is a forefront challenge in neuroscience. We addressed this problem by identifying statistically efficient estimators of correlation matrices of the spiking activity of neural populations. Various underlying processes may reflect differently on the structure of the correlation matrix: Correlations due to common network fluctuations or external inputs are well estimated by low-rank representations, whereas correlations arising from linear interactions between pairs of neurons are well approximated by their pairwise partial correlations. In our data obtained from fast 3D two-photon imaging of calcium signals of large and dense groups of neurons in mouse visual cortex, the best estimation performance was attained by decomposing the correlation matrix into a sparse network of partial correlations (‘interactions’) combined with a low-rank component. The inferred interactions were both positive (‘excitatory’) and negative (‘inhibitory’) and reflected the spatial organization and orientation preferences of the interacting cells. We propose that the most efficient among many estimators provides a more informative picture of the functional connectivity than previous analyses of neural correlations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004083
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004083&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2004. "A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 365-411, February.
    2. Peter Bickel & Bo Li & Alexandre Tsybakov & Sara Geer & Bin Yu & Teófilo Valdés & Carlos Rivero & Jianqing Fan & Aad Vaart, 2006. "Regularization in statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(2), pages 271-344, September.
    3. Vítor Lopes-dos-Santos & Sergio Conde-Ocazionez & Miguel A L Nicolelis & Sidarta T Ribeiro & Adriano B L Tort, 2011. "Neuronal Assembly Detection and Cell Membership Specification by Principal Component Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Peng, Jie & Wang, Pei & Zhou, Nengfeng & Zhu, Ji, 2009. "Partial Correlation Estimation by Joint Sparse Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 735-746.
    5. Ho Ko & Lee Cossell & Chiara Baragli & Jan Antolik & Claudia Clopath & Sonja B. Hofer & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2013. "The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7443), pages 96-100, April.
    6. Jonathan W. Pillow & Jonathon Shlens & Liam Paninski & Alexander Sher & Alan M. Litke & E. J. Chichilnisky & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2008. "Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7207), pages 995-999, August.
    7. Hillel Adesnik & Massimo Scanziani, 2010. "Lateral competition for cortical space by layer-specific horizontal circuits," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7292), pages 1155-1160, April.
    8. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2003. "Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 603-621, December.
    9. Elad Schneidman & Michael J. Berry & Ronen Segev & William Bialek, 2006. "Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 1007-1012, April.
    10. Yasser Roudi & Sheila Nirenberg & Peter E Latham, 2009. "Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Schäfer Juliane & Strimmer Korbinian, 2005. "A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, November.
    12. Tal Kenet & Dmitri Bibitchkov & Misha Tsodyks & Amiram Grinvald & Amos Arieli, 2003. "Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6961), pages 954-956, October.
    13. Ho Ko & Sonja B. Hofer & Bruno Pichler & Katherine A. Buchanan & P. Jesper Sjöström & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2011. "Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7345), pages 87-91, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Recanatesi & Gabriel Koch Ocker & Michael A Buice & Eric Shea-Brown, 2019. "Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: Global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Takafumi Arakaki & G Barello & Yashar Ahmadian, 2019. "Inferring neural circuit structure from datasets of heterogeneous tuning curves," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, April.
    3. Andrea K Barreiro & Cheng Ly, 2017. "When do correlations increase with firing rates in recurrent networks?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Sarah Anhala Cepeda-Humerez & Jakob Ruess & Gašper Tkačik, 2019. "Estimating information in time-varying signals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bailey, Natalia & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Smith, L. Vanessa, 2019. "A multiple testing approach to the regularisation of large sample correlation matrices," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 507-534.
    2. van Wieringen, Wessel N. & Peeters, Carel F.W., 2016. "Ridge estimation of inverse covariance matrices from high-dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 284-303.
    3. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Hannart, Alexis & Naveau, Philippe, 2014. "Estimating high dimensional covariance matrices: A new look at the Gaussian conjugate framework," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-162.
    5. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2017. "Numerical implementation of the QuEST function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 199-223.
    6. Couillet, Romain & McKay, Matthew, 2014. "Large dimensional analysis and optimization of robust shrinkage covariance matrix estimators," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 99-120.
    7. Huang, Na & Fryzlewicz, Piotr, 2018. "NOVELIST estimator of large correlation and covariance matrices and their inverses," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 89055, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Fisher, Thomas J. & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2011. "Improved Stein-type shrinkage estimators for the high-dimensional multivariate normal covariance matrix," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1909-1918, May.
    9. Ikeda, Yuki & Kubokawa, Tatsuya & Srivastava, Muni S., 2016. "Comparison of linear shrinkage estimators of a large covariance matrix in normal and non-normal distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-108.
    10. Joong-Ho Won & Johan Lim & Seung-Jean Kim & Bala Rajaratnam, 2013. "Condition-number-regularized covariance estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 427-450, June.
    11. Benjamin Dunn & Maria Mørreaunet & Yasser Roudi, 2015. "Correlations and Functional Connections in a Population of Grid Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Arno Onken & Valentin Dragoi & Klaus Obermayer, 2012. "A Maximum Entropy Test for Evaluating Higher-Order Correlations in Spike Counts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Gašper Tkačik & Olivier Marre & Dario Amodei & Elad Schneidman & William Bialek & Michael J Berry II, 2014. "Searching for Collective Behavior in a Large Network of Sensory Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2019. "The power of (non-)linear shrinking: a review and guide to covariance matrix estimation," ECON - Working Papers 323, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Feb 2020.
    15. Daniel Bartz & Kerr Hatrick & Christian W Hesse & Klaus-Robert Müller & Steven Lemm, 2013. "Directional Variance Adjustment: Bias Reduction in Covariance Matrices Based on Factor Analysis with an Application to Portfolio Optimization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Na Huang & Piotr Fryzlewicz, 2019. "NOVELIST estimator of large correlation and covariance matrices and their inverses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 694-727, September.
    17. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    18. Avagyan, Vahe & Nogales, Francisco J., 2015. "D-trace Precision Matrix Estimation Using Adaptive Lasso Penalties," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 21775, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    19. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    20. McDowell, Shaun, 2018. "An empirical evaluation of estimation error reduction strategies applied to international diversification," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-13.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.