IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v60y2009i10d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural language and the art and science of problem/opportunity formulation: a transportation planning case analysis

Author

Listed:
  • R Volkema

    (American University
    Coppead-UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro)

Abstract

The formulation process has been called the most important phase of decision making, yet little is known about how this process is carried out in a group, team, or organizational context through a discussion of issues and opportunities. This paper reviews the literatures on problem/opportunity formulation, particularly as related to the use of natural language in developing collective perception. Applying a taxonomy of six linguistic structures, the formulation process of a 13-member transportation planning committee is analysed. The results of this field study suggest overall preferences for simple rather than complex linguistic structures, differentiated by member roles (leader versus non-leader). Further, exploration of the problem/opportunity-space began with a relatively broad interpretation of the problematic situation, and proceeded incrementally. Digressions from this incremental exploration increased as the process unfolded, precipitated by changes in speakers. The implications of this analysis for understanding and managing the formulation process, as well as for future research, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • R Volkema, 2009. "Natural language and the art and science of problem/opportunity formulation: a transportation planning case analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1360-1372, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:60:y:2009:i:10:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602653
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602653
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger J., Ronald H. Volkema Gorman, 1998. "The Influence of Cognitive‐based Group Composition on Decision‐making Process and Outcome," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 105-121, January.
    2. Frankwick, Gary L. & Walker, Beth A. & Ward, James C., 1994. "Belief structures in conflict: Mapping a strategic marketing decision," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(2-3), pages 183-195.
    3. Eden, Colin, 2004. "Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 673-686, December.
    4. Walsh, James P. & Henderson, Caroline M. & Deighton, John, 1988. "Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 194-216, October.
    5. John Paul MacDuffie, 1997. "The Road to "Root Cause": Shop-Floor Problem-Solving at Three Auto Assembly Plants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 479-502, April.
    6. M B Wright, 2007. "Case study: problem formulation and solution for a real-world sports scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(4), pages 439-445, April.
    7. Schulz-Hardt, Stefan & Jochims, Marc & Frey, Dieter, 2002. "Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 563-586, July.
    8. Nutt, Paul C., 2007. "Intelligence gathering for decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 604-622, October.
    9. Mauri Laukkanen, 1994. "Comparative Cause Mapping of Organizational Cognitions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 322-343, August.
    10. Jack A. Nickerson & Todd R. Zenger, 2004. "A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm—The Problem-Solving Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 617-632, December.
    11. Liam Fahey & V. K. Narayanan, 1989. "Linking Changes In Revealed Causal Maps And Environmental Change: An Empirical Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 361-378, July.
    12. Ann Langley & Henry Mintzberg & Patricia Pitcher & Elizabeth Posada & Jan Saint-Macary, 1995. "Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 260-279, June.
    13. Roger J. Volkema, 1986. "Problem formulation as a purposive activity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 267-279, May.
    14. Patricia Doyle Corner & Angelo J. Kinicki & Barbara W. Keats, 1994. "Integrating Organizational and Individual Information Processing Perspectives on Choice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 294-308, August.
    15. James P. Walsh, 1995. "Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 280-321, June.
    16. Colin Eden & Fran Ackermann & Steve Cropper, 1992. "The Analysis Of Cause Maps," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 309-324, May.
    17. C Eden & F Ackermann, 2006. "Where next for problem structuring methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(7), pages 766-768, July.
    18. Roger J. Volkema, 1995. "Creativity in MS/OR: Managing the Process of Formulating the Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 81-87, June.
    19. Michel G. Bougon, 1992. "Congregate Cognitive Maps: A Unified Dynamic Theory Of Organization And Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 369-387, May.
    20. Paul C. Nutt, 1993. "The Formulation Processes and Tactics Used in Organizational Decision Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 226-251, May.
    21. Van Schie, Els C. M. & Van Der Pligt, Joop, 1994. "Getting an Anchor on Availability in Causal Judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 140-154, January.
    22. Marjorie A. Lyles, 1981. "Formulating strategic problems: Empirical analysis and model development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 61-75, January.
    23. Roger J. Volkema, 1983. "Problem Formulation in Planning and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 639-652, June.
    24. Bowen, Ken, 2001. "The process of problem-formulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 258-265, January.
    25. Fran Ackermann & Colin Eden, 2005. "Using Causal Mapping with Group Support Systems to Elicit an Understanding of Failure in Complex Projects: Some Implications for Organizational Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 355-376, September.
    26. D Shaw & F Ackermann & C Eden, 2003. "Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(9), pages 936-948, September.
    27. Gerald F. Smith, 1995. "Classifying Managerial Problems: An Empirical Study Of Definitional Content," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 679-706, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ormerod, Richard & Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2023. "Understanding participant actions in OR interventions using practice theories: A research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 810-827.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schaffernicht, Martin F.G. & Groesser, Stefan N., 2014. "The SEXTANT software: A tool for automating the comparative analysis of mental models of dynamic systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 566-578.
    2. S. R. Singhvi & Rajat Gera, 2005. "Problem Formulation and Categorization: An Empirical Study of Marketing Problems in an Organization," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 30(2), pages 121-138, May.
    3. David P. Tegarden & Linda F. Tegarden & Steven D. Sheetz, 2009. "Cognitive Factions in a Top Management Team: Surfacing and Analyzing Cognitive Diversity using Causal Maps," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 537-566, November.
    4. Jackson Nickerson & Nicholas Argyres, 2018. "Strategizing Before Strategic Decision Making," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 592-605, December.
    5. Georgiou, Ion, 2009. "A graph-theoretic perspective on the links-to-concepts ratio expected in cognitive maps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 834-836, September.
    6. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Andrew Parker, 2017. "Boundary Capabilities in MNCs: Knowledge Transformation for Creative Solution Development," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 455-482, June.
    7. White, Leroy, 2016. "Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 827-841.
    8. Matin Mohaghegh & Andreas Größler, 2020. "The Dynamics of Operational Problem-Solving: A Dual-Process Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 27-54, February.
    9. Fran Ackermann & Colin Eden, 2005. "Using Causal Mapping with Group Support Systems to Elicit an Understanding of Failure in Complex Projects: Some Implications for Organizational Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 355-376, September.
    10. Florence Allard-Poesi, 1998. "Representations And Influence Processes In Groups: Towards A Socio-Cognitive Perspective On Cognition In Organization," Post-Print hal-01490579, HAL.
    11. Björkdahl, Joakim & Linder, Marcus, 2015. "Formulating problems for commercializing new technologies: The case of environmental innovation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 14-24.
    12. Huang, Fuqun & Smidts, Carol, 2017. "Causal Mechanism Graph ─ A new notation for capturing cause-effect knowledge in software dependability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 196-212.
    13. Sucheta Nadkarni & V. K. Narayanan, 2007. "The Evolution of Collective Strategy Frames in High- and Low-Velocity Industries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 688-710, August.
    14. Spanellis, Agnessa & MacBryde, Jillian & Dӧrfler, Viktor, 2021. "A dynamic model of knowledge management in innovative technology companies: A case from the energy sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 784-797.
    15. Ellspermann, Susan J. & Evans, Gerald W. & Basadur, Min, 2007. "The impact of training on the formulation of ill-structured problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 221-236, April.
    16. H V Vo & B Chae & D L Olson, 2007. "Developing unbounded systems thinking: using causal mapping with multiple stakeholders within a Vietnamese company," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 655-668, May.
    17. Montibeller, Gilberto & Franco, Alberto & Lord, Ewan & Iglesias, Aline, 2008. "Structuring multi-criteria portfolio analysis models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 22693, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Marchant, Thierry, 1999. "Cognitive maps and fuzzy implications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 626-637, May.
    19. Etienne Rouwette & Ingrid Bastings & Hans Blokker, 2011. "A Comparison of Group Model Building and Strategic Options Development and Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 781-803, November.
    20. Felipe A. Csaszar & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2016. "Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(10), pages 2031-2049, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:60:y:2009:i:10:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.