IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v192y2024i3d10.1007_s10551-023-05459-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace Incivility in STEM Organizations: A Typology of STEM Incivility and Affective Consequences for Women Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Mahima Saxena

    (University of Nebraska at Omaha)

Abstract

Workplace incivility has been touted as a form of modern discrimination with serious negative consequences for the target. The increasingly unequal gender distribution in STEM workforce has also been attributed to workplace incivility. This study examines the lived experience of this covert mistreatment for women employees in STEM workplaces. Data from STEM women employees revealed a typology of STEM incivility, mapping onto ostracism, hostility, undermining, and sexual incivility. Further, the gendered nature and STEM-specific phenomenology of incivility against women employees, based on instigator characteristics, incivility frequency, and the general climate of STEM which aided or fostered interpersonal mistreatment was found. Drawing on affective events theory from organizational sciences and grounded in the STEM industry, this research examined the person-centric, emotional consequences of being a target of STEM incivility. Three broad themes that describe the first-person, felt-experience impact of mistreatment were as follows: discrete emotions, emotion regulation, duration of emotion experience. Upon encountering uncivil interpersonal experiences, participant reactions fell among one of four discrete emotional states: anger, fear, sadness, and surprise. Emotion regulation emerged as a key feature of the affective response. Specifically, STEM demands were tied to participant utilization of the regulation strategy of suppression to hide the felt emotion initially and reappraisal and response modulation over time. Importantly, although understood as a mild event, the emotional consequences of incivility were long-lasting such that they continued beyond the episode, lasting anywhere from two hours to a week. The STEM context was central to the emotion trajectories. Results are discussed with respect to work performance, attitudinal, and health-related consequences for women employees in STEM jobs. Practical implications are discussed with a special grounding in STEM context with an eye toward best practices for managing incivility for women in STEM.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahima Saxena, 2024. "Workplace Incivility in STEM Organizations: A Typology of STEM Incivility and Affective Consequences for Women Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 501-525, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:192:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05459-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05459-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-023-05459-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-023-05459-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saxena, Mahima & Geiselman, Timothy Adam & Zhang, Sheng, 2019. "Workplace incivility against women in STEM: Insights and best practices," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 589-594.
    2. Weiss, Howard M. & Rupp, Deborah E., 2011. "Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person-Centric Work Psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 83-97, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Hong & Guan, Yanjun & Wu, Chia-Huei & Erdogan, Berrin & Bauer, Talya & Yao, Xiang, 2018. "A relational model of perceived overqualification: the moderating role of interpersonal influence on social acceptance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67547, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Rupp, Deborah E. & Shao, Ruodan & Jones, Kisha S. & Liao, Hui, 2014. "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and socia," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 159-185.
    3. Byung‐Jik Kim & Youngkyun Chang & Tae‐Hyun Kim, 2023. "Translating corporate social responsibility into financial performance: Exploring roles of work engagement and strategic coherence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2555-2573, September.
    4. Oliver Weigelt & Antje Schmitt & Christine J. Syrek & Sandra Ohly, 2021. "Exploring the Engaged Worker over Time—A Week-Level Study of How Positive and Negative Work Events Affect Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Sendlhofer, Tina & Tolstoy, Daniel, 2022. "How employees shape CSR transparency: A sensemaking perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 268-278.
    6. Jun Song & Jibao Gu & Jianlin Wu & Shuo Xu, 2019. "Differential promotive voice–prohibitive voice relationships with employee performance: Power distance orientation as a moderator," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1053-1077, December.
    7. Cojuharenco, Irina & Patient, David & Bashshur, Michael R., 2011. "Seeing the "forest" or the "trees" of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 17-31, September.
    8. José María Rentería & Dante Solano, 2022. "Does teacher subjective well-being influence students' learning achievement? Evidence from public basic education in Peru," Post-Print halshs-03688119, HAL.
    9. Ann Mari May & Mary G. McGarvey & Muazzam Toshmatova, 2024. "Gender differences in graduate student views on the professional climate in economics," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(2), pages 206-222, April.
    10. Nitu Maria Elena & Sălceanu Claudia & Chendrean Sebastian Tiberiu, 2023. "Exploring the dynamics of neuroticism: A comprehensive analysis of two different workplace settings," BlackSea Journal of Psychology, Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 77-95, November.
    11. José María Renteíra & Dante Solano, 2022. "Does teacher subjective well-being influence students' learning achievement? Evidence from public basic education in Peru," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03688119, HAL.
    12. Burke-Smalley, Lisa A. & Evans, W. Randy & Zelin, Alexandra I., 2022. "Voices of abused workers: Implications for mitigating worker mistreatment," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 315-327.
    13. Irene Chaidi & Chara Papoutsi & Athanasios Drigas & Charalabos Skianis, 2022. "Women: E-Entrepreneurship and Emotional Intelligence," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 214-237, April.
    14. Martikainen, Suvi Jonna & Kudrna, Laura & Dolan, Paul, 2022. "Moments of meaningfulness and meaninglessness: a qualitative inquiry into affective eudaimonia at work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113970, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Muafi & Olivia Fachrunnisa & Yuni Siswanti & Zainal Mustofa Qadri & Dwipraptono Agus Harjito, 2019. "Empowering Leadership and Individual Readiness to Change: the Role of People Dimension and Work Method," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1515-1535, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:192:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05459-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.