IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i2p1600-1622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Barron

    (WZB Berlin, 10785 Berlin, Germany)

  • Ruth Ditlmann

    (Hertie School Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany)

  • Stefan Gehrig

    (WZB Berlin, 10785 Berlin, Germany)

  • Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

This paper studies a key element of discrimination, namely, when stereotypes translate into discriminatory actions. Using a hiring experiment, we rule out taste-based discrimination by design and test for the presence of two types of belief-based gender discrimination. We document evidence of explicit discriminators —individuals who are willing to discriminate even when their hiring choices are highly revealing of their gender-biased beliefs. Crucially, we also identify implicit discriminators —individuals who do not discriminate against women when taking a discriminatory action is highly revealing of their biased beliefs, but do discriminate against women when their biased motive is obscured. Our analysis highlights the central role played by features of the choice environment in determining whether and how discrimination will manifest. We conclude by discussing the implications for policy design.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Barron & Ruth Ditlmann & Stefan Gehrig & Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch, 2025. "Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1600-1622, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:2:p:1600-1622
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.01229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:2:p:1600-1622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.