IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v52y2022i6p553-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clemson University’s Rotational Attendance Plan During COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Amy B. Gore

    (School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634)

  • Mary E. Kurz

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634)

  • Matthew J. Saltzman

    (School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634)

  • Blake Splitter

    (School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634)

  • William C. Bridges

    (School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634)

  • Neil J. Calkin

    (School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced universities to upend their class scheduling. At Clemson University, the administration implemented hybrid schedules for fall 2020, in which students attend classes partly online and partly in person. To limit exposures of COVID-19 in the classroom, we propose two rotational attendance models (the three-cohort model and the once-a-week model) that aim to allow in-person classroom time and minimize exposure between students. In a baseline strategy, students would interact with an average of 84 students per week and attend class in person 2.6 days a week. By contrast, the three-cohort model and once-a-week model achieve about 57 and 83 student interactions per week and 1.6 and 1.9 in-person student attendance days a week, respectively. Although these figures of merit may imply that the three-cohort model is preferable, it achieves its results by forcing about 1,600 of the 21,000 students who want to attend courses in person to participate online instead and forcing courses that meet twice a week to be attended twice in a three-week rotation. Considering the tradeoffs between the figures of merit related to student interaction and anticipated implementation challenges, Clemson University implemented the once-a-week model for fall 2020 and spring 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy B. Gore & Mary E. Kurz & Matthew J. Saltzman & Blake Splitter & William C. Bridges & Neil J. Calkin, 2022. "Clemson University’s Rotational Attendance Plan During COVID-19," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 553-567, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:52:y:2022:i:6:p:553-567
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2022.1139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.1139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2022.1139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warren M. Hirsch & George B. Dantzig, 1968. "The fixed charge problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 413-424, September.
    2. Clarence H. Martin, 2004. "Ohio University's College of Business Uses Integer Programming to Schedule Classes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 460-465, December.
    3. Vid Ogris & Tomaž Kristan & Andrej Škraba & Marko Urh & Davorin Kofjač, 2016. "iUrnik: Timetabling for Primary Educational Institutions in Slovenia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 231-244, April.
    4. Jan Stallaert, 1997. "Automated Timetabling Improves Course Scheduling at UCLA," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 67-81, August.
    5. Timothy R. Hinkin & Gary M. Thompson, 2002. "SchedulExpert: Scheduling Courses in the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 45-57, December.
    6. Gerardo Gonzalez & Christopher Richards & Alexandra Newman, 2018. "Optimal Course Scheduling for United States Air Force Academy Cadets," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 217-234, June.
    7. Werner Junginger, 1986. "Timetabling in Germany---A Survey," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 66-74, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ciamac C. Moallemi & Utkarsh Patange, 2024. "Hybrid Scheduling with Mixed-Integer Programming at Columbia Business School," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 222-240, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciamac C. Moallemi & Utkarsh Patange, 2024. "Hybrid Scheduling with Mixed-Integer Programming at Columbia Business School," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 222-240, May.
    2. R. Alan Bowman, 2021. "Developing Optimal Student Plans of Study," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 409-421, November.
    3. Christopher Garcia, 2019. "Practice Summary: Managing Capacity at the University of Mary Washington’s College of Business," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 167-171, March.
    4. Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani, 2020. "Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling with Student Flow, Soft Constraints, and Smoothing Objectives: an Application to a Real Case Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Jaime Miranda, 2010. "eClasSkeduler: A Course Scheduling System for the Executive Education Unit at the Universidad de Chile," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 196-207, June.
    6. Cristian D. Palma & Patrick Bornhardt, 2020. "Considering Section Balance in an Integer Optimization Model for the Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Mak-Hau, Vicky & Yearwood, John & Nguyen, Vivian, 2022. "The multiphase course timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1098-1119.
    8. Lara, Cristiana L. & Koenemann, Jochen & Nie, Yisu & de Souza, Cid C., 2023. "Scalable timing-aware network design via lagrangian decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 152-169.
    9. Ling Gai & Ying Jin & Binyuan Zhang, 2022. "An integrated method for hybrid distribution with estimation of demand matching degree," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2782-2808, November.
    10. Gaudioso, Manlio & Monaco, Maria Flavia & Sammarra, Marcello, 2021. "A Lagrangian heuristics for the truck scheduling problem in multi-door, multi-product Cross-Docking with constant processing time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Andreas Dellnitz & Damian Pozo & Jochen Bauer & Andreas Kleine, 2023. "Practice Summary: Seminar Assignments in a University—MATLAB-Based Decision Support," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 307-311, July.
    12. K A Willoughby & C J Zappe, 2006. "A methodology to optimize foundation seminar assignments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(8), pages 950-956, August.
    13. Clarence H. Martin, 2004. "Ohio University's College of Business Uses Integer Programming to Schedule Classes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 460-465, December.
    14. Mojtaba Akbari & Saber Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi & Sadegh Niroomand, 2020. "Meta-heuristic approaches for fixed-charge solid transportation problem in two-stage supply chain network," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 447-471, March.
    15. Michael Marte, 2007. "Towards constraint-based school timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 207-225, November.
    16. Boronico, Jess, 2000. "Quantitative modeling and technology driven departmental course scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 327-346, June.
    17. Alex Scott & Chris Parker & Christopher W. Craighead, 2017. "Service Refusals in Supply Chains: Drivers and Deterrents of Freight Rejection," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1086-1101, November.
    18. Shyamali Ghosh & Karl-Heinz Küfer & Sankar Kumar Roy & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2023. "Type-2 zigzag uncertain multi-objective fixed-charge solid transportation problem: time window vs. preservation technology," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 337-362, March.
    19. R. A. Oude Vrielink & E. A. Jansen & E. W. Hans & J. Hillegersberg, 2019. "Practices in timetabling in higher education institutions: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(1), pages 145-160, April.
    20. Janice K. Winch & Jack Yurkiewicz, 2014. "Case Article—Class Scheduling with Linear Programming," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 143-147, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:52:y:2022:i:6:p:553-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.