IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v34y2004i6p460-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ohio University's College of Business Uses Integer Programming to Schedule Classes

Author

Listed:
  • Clarence H. Martin

    (College of Business, Ohio University, 512 Copeland Hall, Athens, Ohio 45701-2979)

Abstract

Ohio University's College of Business uses an integer-programming model to assign instructors to courses, classrooms, and time slots. The model deals with a variety of issues, such as back-to-back classes, maximum number of teaching days, time slots of any configuration, multiple instructors for courses, departmental balance, and preassignments. CPLEX solves the problem for the College of Business quite easily. The college has used the model for about six years, and the administration and faculty view it very favorably.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarence H. Martin, 2004. "Ohio University's College of Business Uses Integer Programming to Schedule Classes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 460-465, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:34:y:2004:i:6:p:460-465
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1040.0106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1040.0106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1040.0106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burke, Edmund Kieran & Petrovic, Sanja, 2002. "Recent research directions in automated timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 266-280, July.
    2. Timothy R. Hinkin & Gary M. Thompson, 2002. "SchedulExpert: Scheduling Courses in the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 45-57, December.
    3. Drexl, Andreas & Salewski, Frank, 1997. "Distribution requirements and compactness constraints in school timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 193-214, October.
    4. Michael W. Carter & Craig A. Tovey, 1992. "When Is the Classroom Assignment Problem Hard?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1-supplem), pages 28-39, February.
    5. C. Roger Glassey & Michael Mizrach, 1986. "A Decision Support System for Assigning Classes to Rooms," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 92-100, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ciamac C. Moallemi & Utkarsh Patange, 2024. "Hybrid Scheduling with Mixed-Integer Programming at Columbia Business School," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 222-240, May.
    2. Vid Ogris & Tomaž Kristan & Andrej Škraba & Marko Urh & Davorin Kofjač, 2016. "iUrnik: Timetabling for Primary Educational Institutions in Slovenia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 231-244, April.
    3. Christopher Garcia, 2019. "Practice Summary: Managing Capacity at the University of Mary Washington’s College of Business," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 167-171, March.
    4. Amy B. Gore & Mary E. Kurz & Matthew J. Saltzman & Blake Splitter & William C. Bridges & Neil J. Calkin, 2022. "Clemson University’s Rotational Attendance Plan During COVID-19," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 553-567, November.
    5. Janice K. Winch & Jack Yurkiewicz, 2014. "Case Article—Class Scheduling with Linear Programming," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 143-147, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciamac C. Moallemi & Utkarsh Patange, 2024. "Hybrid Scheduling with Mixed-Integer Programming at Columbia Business School," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 222-240, May.
    2. C Beyrouthy & E K Burke & D Landa-Silva & B McCollum & P McMullan & A J Parkes, 2009. "Towards improving the utilization of university teaching space," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 130-143, January.
    3. Oliver Czibula & Hanyu Gu & Aaron Russell & Yakov Zinder, 2017. "A multi-stage IP-based heuristic for class timetabling and trainer rostering," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 252(2), pages 305-333, May.
    4. Johnes, Jill, 2015. "Operational Research in education," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 683-696.
    5. Raphael Medeiros Alves & Francisco Cunha & Anand Subramanian & Alisson V. Brito, 2022. "Minimizing energy consumption in a real-life classroom assignment problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1149-1175, December.
    6. Nelishia Pillay, 2014. "A survey of school timetabling research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 218(1), pages 261-293, July.
    7. Biniyam Asmare Kassa, 2015. "Implementing a Class-Scheduling System at the College of Business and Economics of Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 203-215, June.
    8. Pongcharoen, P. & Promtet, W. & Yenradee, P. & Hicks, C., 2008. "Stochastic Optimisation Timetabling Tool for university course scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 903-918, April.
    9. Jason J. Sauppe & David R. Morrison & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2015. "Assigning Panels to Meeting Rooms at the National Science Foundation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 529-542, December.
    10. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Mak-Hau, Vicky & Yearwood, John & Nguyen, Vivian, 2022. "The multiphase course timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1098-1119.
    11. Craig A. Tovey, 2002. "Tutorial on Computational Complexity," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 30-61, June.
    12. Andrea Bettinelli & Valentina Cacchiani & Roberto Roberti & Paolo Toth, 2015. "An overview of curriculum-based course timetabling," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 313-349, July.
    13. Song, Kwonsik & Kim, Sooyoung & Park, Moonseo & Lee, Hyun-Soo, 2017. "Energy efficiency-based course timetabling for university buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 394-405.
    14. R. Alan Bowman, 2021. "Developing Optimal Student Plans of Study," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 409-421, November.
    15. Gerhard Post & Samad Ahmadi & Sophia Daskalaki & Jeffrey Kingston & Jari Kyngas & Cimmo Nurmi & David Ranson, 2012. "An XML format for benchmarks in High School Timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 385-397, April.
    16. Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani, 2020. "Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling with Student Flow, Soft Constraints, and Smoothing Objectives: an Application to a Real Case Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Drexl, Andreas & Nissen, Rudiger & Patterson, James H. & Salewski, Frank, 2000. "ProGen/[pi]x - An instance generator for resource-constrained project scheduling problems with partially renewable resources and further extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 59-72, August.
    18. Vermuyten, Hendrik & Lemmens, Stef & Marques, Inês & Beliën, Jeroen, 2016. "Developing compact course timetables with optimized student flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 651-661.
    19. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Jeffrey Kingston, 2012. "Resource assignment in high school timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 241-254, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:34:y:2004:i:6:p:460-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.