IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10555-d896456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Agritourism Location Investigation in Vietnam by a Spherical Fuzzy Extension of Integrated Decision-Making Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chihkang Kenny Wu

    (Department of Tourism Management, Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Nan Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Thi Kim Trang Le

    (Department of Tourism Management, Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

  • Nhat-Luong Nhieu

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan)

Abstract

For tourists in the post-COVID era, it is a popular choice to experience nature and idyllic rural life in fields, gardens, and farms instead of crowding into high-level services in modern tourist destinations. This trend has created a focus on sustainable development within tourism. Agritourism is an alternative tourism experience that demonstrates high potential for the tourism industry while positively impacting agricultural production in rural areas. A suitable location selection process is essential to effectively developing agritourism and sustainability. However, the current literature on this issue is still limited. Therefore, this study introduces a combined decision-making model for optimal agritourism destination identification in the context of sustainable development. This research highlights the use of the spherical fuzzy set (SFSs), in which the spherical fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) determines the criteria’s importance in combination with their causal relationship, and the spherical fuzzy Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) finds the alternative destinations’ priority. The model’s efficiency is illustrated through an empirical study of Vietnam and by a sensitivity analysis. The resulting research found that decision-makers should consider the factors of local living conditions (ASC10), and local agriculture products (ASC3) when investigating agritourism locations. Consequently, the optimal destination for sustainable agritourism development was found to be Lam Dong (AD9), which can efficiently promote tourism activities while increasing the value of agriculture in the countryside. These findings can assist decision-makers in selecting tourism sites in other regions and other tourism development projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Chihkang Kenny Wu & Chia-Nan Wang & Thi Kim Trang Le & Nhat-Luong Nhieu, 2022. "Sustainable Agritourism Location Investigation in Vietnam by a Spherical Fuzzy Extension of Integrated Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10555-:d:896456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaowen Jin & Hao Wu & Jing Zhang & Guangming He, 2021. "Agritourism Development in the USA: The Strategy of the State of Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Laura Broccardo & Francesca Culasso & Elisa Truant, 2017. "Unlocking Value Creation Using an Agritourism Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Govindan, Kannan & Chaudhuri, Atanu, 2016. "Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-195.
    4. Yen-Chieh Chen & Hsiao-Li Yao & Shou-Der Weng & Yang-Fei Tai, 2022. "An Analysis of the Optimal Facility Location of Tourism Industry in Plain Region by Utilizing GIS," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    5. Hsin-Hung Wu & Ya-Ning Tsai, 2012. "An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 2114-2124.
    6. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2020. "How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Batista e Silva, Filipe & Barranco, Ricardo & Proietti, Paola & Pigaiani, Cristian & Lavalle, Carlo, 2021. "A new European regional tourism typology based on hotel location patterns and geographical criteria," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Karina Nicole Pérez-Olmos & Noé Aguilar-Rivera, 2021. "Agritourism and sustainable local development in Mexico: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17180-17200, December.
    9. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Ming-Lang Tseng & Chia-Hao Chang & Kuo-Jui Wu & Chun-Wei Remen Lin & Bhuripan Kalnaovkul & Raymond R. Tan, 2019. "Sustainable Agritourism in Thailand: Modeling Business Performance and Environmental Sustainability under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Sgroi, Filippo & Donia, Enrica & Mineo, Angelo Marcello, 2018. "Agritourism and local development: A methodology for assessing the role of public contributions in the creation of competitive advantage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 676-682.
    12. Tew, Christine & Barbieri, Carla, 2012. "The perceived benefits of agritourism: The provider’s perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 215-224.
    13. Yung-Chi Shen, 2017. "Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2865-2884, November.
    14. Fu Chen & Der-Jang Chi, 2015. "Application of a new DEMATEL to explore key factors of China’s corporate social responsibility: evidence from accounting experts," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 135-154, January.
    15. Popovic, Gabrijela & Stanujkic, Dragisa & Brzakovic, Miodrag & Karabasevic, Darjan, 2019. "A multiple-criteria decision-making model for the selection of a hotel location," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 49-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minh-Tai Le & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Thuy-Duong Thi Pham, 2022. "Direct-Use Geothermal Energy Location Multi-Criteria Planning for On-Site Energy Security in Emergencies: A Case Study of Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    2. Giovanni Peira & Davide Longo & Francesca Pucciarelli & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2021. "Rural Tourism Destination: The Ligurian Farmers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Sofia Karampela & Alexis Andreopoulos & Alex Koutsouris, 2021. "“Agro”, “Agri”, or “Rural”: The Different Viewpoints of Tourism Research Combined with Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Caoile, Roella Grace U & Ceria, Eleonor Joy C. & Jacinto, Christine Joy S. & Salome, Angel Veronica R. & Covita, Mayvelyn S., 2024. "Farming for the Future: Assessing Sustainable Practices among Farm Tourism Sites in Bagabag, Nueva Vizcaya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 3665-3702, September.
    5. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Yung-Lun Liu & Jui-Te Chiang & Pen-Fa Ko, 2023. "The benefits of tourism for rural community development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Khairabadi, Omid & Sajadzadeh, Hassan & Mohammadianmansoor, Saheb, 2020. "Assessment and evaluation of tourism activities with emphasis on agritourism: The case of simin region in Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Vincenzo Giaccio & Luigi Mastronardi & Davide Marino & Agostino Giannelli & Alfonso Scardera, 2018. "Do Rural Policies Impact on Tourism Development in Italy? A Case Study of Agritourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2021. "Economic performance of agritourism: an analysis of farms located in a less favoured area in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Huanchen Tang & Ruiqi Wang & Xiaowen Jin & Zhengzheng Zhang, 2022. "The Effects of Motivation, Destination Image and Satisfaction on Rural Tourism Tourists’ Willingness to Revisit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Zabih-Allah Torabi & Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Colin Michael Hall & Neda Beiraghi Khatibi, 2023. "Unintended Maladaptation: How Agritourism Development Policies in Iran Have Increased Vulnerability to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Emilio Chiodo & Andrea Fantini & Lori Dickes & Temitope Arogundade & R. David Lamie & Lucilene Assing & Corinne Stewart & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Agritourism in Mountainous Regions—Insights from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Ketut Eko Ari Saputro & Hasim & Lina Karlinasari & Irfan Syauqi Beik, 2023. "Evaluation of Sustainable Rural Tourism Development with an Integrated Approach Using MDS and ANP Methods: Case Study in Ciamis, West Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Xiaowen Jin & Liang Wang & Zhengzheng Zhang & Jingzhuang Yan, 2022. "Factors Affecting the Income of Agritourism Operations: Evidence from an Eastern Chinese County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Xiaowen Jin & Hao Wu & Jing Zhang & Guangming He, 2021. "Agritourism Development in the USA: The Strategy of the State of Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Andrzej Tucki & Korneliusz Pylak, 2021. "Collective or Individual? What Types of Tourism Reduce Economic Inequality in Peripheral Regions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Kumar Bhatta & Yasuo Ohe, 2020. "A Review of Quantitative Studies in Agritourism: The Implications for Developing Countries," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Kenneth T. Benignos & Kristin Iris G. Estores, 2022. "Viability of an Integrated Farm as an Agritourism Site in Toboso, Negros Occidental inthe New Normal," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 483-502, August.
    20. Rosa Maria Fanelli & Luca Romagnoli, 2020. "Customer Satisfaction with Farmhouse Facilities and Its Implications for the Promotion of Agritourism Resources in Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10555-:d:896456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.