IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7476-d412034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Procurement Adoption: A Case Study about the Role of Two Italian Advisory Services

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Belisari

    (Department of Management and Law, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Daniele Binci

    (Department of Management and Law, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Appolloni

    (Department of Management and Law, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
    School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK
    Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
    Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), National Research Council (CNR), 80134 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze e-procurement adoption projects with specific focus on the Italian market. E-procurement adoption is critical for organizations, both for its internal efficiency and for the deep impact on sustainability issues. E-procurement adoption, however, is a complex journey as its implementation deals with various obstacles and the adoption costs can limit the overall organizational performance. Advisory services can support organizations in reaching the overall benefits of the e-procurement solution also by reducing the setbacks related to low technology literacy of end-users. Accordingly, we analyze adoption of e-procurement, its main variables and outputs, by focusing on a comparative case study based on an exploratory-inductive investigation of two Italian leading providers. The data have been collected through primary (semistructured interviews) and secondary (companies’ internal documents and companies’ websites) sources. Results highlight that when firms decide to adopt e-procurement, advisory services have an enabling role that can support them into implementation, and particularly for overcoming barriers and helping them to achieve the expected benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Belisari & Daniele Binci & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "E-Procurement Adoption: A Case Study about the Role of Two Italian Advisory Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7476-:d:412034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2008. "Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 159-175, May.
    3. Panayiotou, Nikolaos A. & Gayialis, Sotiris P. & Tatsiopoulos, I.P.Ilias P., 2004. "An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 79-102, July.
    4. Henry Mintzberg & James A. Waters, 1985. "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 257-272, July.
    5. Ignazio Cabras, 2010. "Use of E-procurement in Local Authorities' Purchasing and Its Effects on Local Economies: Evidence from Cumbria, UK," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 1133-1151, July.
    6. Sara Belisari & Andrea Appolloni & Corrado Cerruti, 2019. "Positive and negative impacts of the adoption of e-procurement solutions: the Italian market case," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 219-241.
    7. Walker, Helen & Brammer, Stephen, 2012. "The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 256-268.
    8. Vincent-Jones, Peter, 2006. "The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199291274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulo Renato de Sousa & Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Paulo Tarso Vilela de Resende & Ricardo Ruiz Rodrigues & Myrian Teixeira Moura & Daniel Matoso, 2021. "Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned: Sustainability in Brazilian Omnichannel Retail," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Qi Ma & Chi-Cheng Chang & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2021. "Detecting the Crisis of Supply Chain Management on E-Commerce for Sustainability Using Q-Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Angelo Leogrande & Carlo Drago & Massimo Arnone, 2024. "Analyzing Regional Disparities in E-Commerce Adoption Among Italian SMEs: Integrating Machine Learning Clustering and Predictive Models with Econometric Analysis," Working Papers hal-04700413, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amish Aqeel & Muhammad Asim, 2019. "Factors Influencing E-Procurement Practice in Pakistan," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Toktaş-Palut, Peral & Baylav, Ecem & Teoman, Seyhan & Altunbey, Mustafa, 2014. "The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 77-90.
    3. Gunasekaran, Angappa & McGaughey, Ronald E. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Rai, Bharatendra K., 2009. "E-Procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 161-175, November.
    4. AlNuaimi, Bader Khamis & Khan, Mehmood & Ajmal, Mian M., 2021. "The role of big data analytics capabilities in greening e-procurement: A higher order PLS-SEM analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Chen, Songlin & Tseng, Mitchell M., 2010. "A Negotiation-Credit-Auction mechanism for procuring customized products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 203-210, September.
    6. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    7. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    8. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    10. Cristel Russell & Dale Russell & Jill Klein, 2011. "Ambivalence toward a country and consumers’ willingness to buy emblematic brands: The differential predictive validity of objective and subjective ambivalence measures on behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 357-371, November.
    11. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    12. Patrick Hoverstadt & Lucy Loh, 2024. "Back to basics: Developing systems methodologies from first (systems) principles," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 207-215, January.
    13. Marina Fiedler & Isabell Welpe & Arnold Picot, 2010. "Understanding Radical Change: An Examination of Management Departments in German-speaking Universities," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 21(2), pages 111-134.
    14. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    15. Chenhall, Robert H. & Hall, Matthew & Smith, David, 2010. "Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-government organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 737-756, November.
    16. Ali, Abdul & Mancha, Ruben & Pachamanova, Dessislava, 2018. "Correcting analytics maturity myopia," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 211-219.
    17. Tom Joerß & Payam Akbar & Robert Mai & Stefan Hoffmann, 2017. "Conceptualizing sustainability from a consumer perspective [Konzeptionalisierung der Nachhaltigkeit aus der Konsumentensicht]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 15-23, June.
    18. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    19. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    20. Gebauer, Heiko & Worch, Hagen & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 57-73.
    21. Said Sarabi, 2016. "Development Optimal Strategies for Media Policy of IRIB on Issue of Climate Change," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 115-115, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7476-:d:412034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.