IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3550-d243645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Shao-Long Li

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Fang Sun

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Mingze Li

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

In today’s business world, the environment is changing rapidly. Employers need to rely upon their employees in order to produce long-term competitive advantage and sustainable performance. However, little research has investigated whether sustainable human resource management could prompt change-oriented behaviors in employees. By integrating the job demands–resources (JD-R) model and the proactive motivation model with the existing literature on sustainable human resource management, we explored the relationship between high-commitment work systems (HCWS) and the employees’ taking charge behaviors. Data from 352 employees of 96 organizations provided support for the positive effect of HCWS on the employees’ taking charge behaviors. The results of this study showed that HCWS affect the employees’ taking charge behaviors through their work engagement only when they felt a high level of impact. Based on these results, we not only provide several theoretical contributions to the literature on HCWS and taking charge, but also provide some practical suggestions for how to nurture change-oriented employees using sustainable human resource management within the organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3550-:d:243645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao-Long Li & Wei He & Kai Yam & Li-Rong Long, 2015. "When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: A multilevel examination in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 645-670, September.
    2. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Faridun Bozorov & Sanghyun Sung, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Lynn M. Shore & Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro & Xiao-Ping Chen & Lois E. Tetrick, 2009. "Social Exchange in Work Settings: Content, Process, and Mixed Models," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 5(3), pages 289-302, November.
    4. Chung-Jen Wang & Kuan-Ju Tseng, 2019. "Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service Quality: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Jihye Park & Dawoon Jung & Pyoungsoo Lee, 2019. "How to Make a Sustainable Manufacturing Process: A High-Commitment HRM System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink, 2014. "Sustainability and HRM," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Ina Ehnert & Wes Harry & Klaus J. Zink (ed.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management, edition 127, pages 3-32, Springer.
    7. Ed Snape & Tom Redman, 2010. "HRM Practices, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Performance: A Multi‐Level Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7), pages 1219-1247, November.
    8. Chiang, Yun-Hwa & Shih, Hsi-An & Hsu, Chu-Chun, 2014. "High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 631-640.
    9. Zhixing Xiao & Ingmar Björkman, 2006. "High Commitment Work Systems in Chinese Organizations: A Preliminary Measure," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(3), pages 403-422, November.
    10. Ehnert, Ina & Harry, Wes, 2012. "Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(3), pages 221-238.
    11. Ehnert, Ina & Harry, Wes, 2012. "Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 221-238.
    12. Xiao, Zhixing & Björkman, Ingmar, 2006. "High Commitment Work Systems in Chinese Organizations: A Preliminary Measure," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 403-422, November.
    13. Woocheol Kim & Soo Jeoung Han & Jiwon Park, 2019. "Is the Role of Work Engagement Essential to Employee Performance or ‘Nice to Have’?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Soo Jin Baik & Hae-Deok Song & Ah Jeong Hong, 2018. "Craft Your Job and Get Engaged: Sustainable Change-Oriented Behavior at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Kiwook Kwon & Johngseok Bae & John J. Lawler, 2010. "High Commitment HR Practices and Top Performers," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 57-80, February.
    16. Danping Shao & Erhua Zhou & Peiran Gao & Lirong Long & Jie Xiong, 2019. "Double-Edged Effects of Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Employee Task Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating by Role Ambiguity and Moderating by Prosocial Mot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Lu Zhang & Xiaochao Guo & Zhimei Lei & Ming K. Lim, 2019. "Social Network Analysis of Sustainable Human Resource Management from the Employee Training’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Hui Li & Nazir Sajjad & Qun Wang & Asadullah Muhammad Ali & Zeb Khaqan & Shafi Amina, 2019. "Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Shore, Lynn M. & Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M. & Chen, Xiao-Ping & Tetrick, Lois E., 2009. "Social Exchange in Work Settings: Content, Process, and Mixed Models," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(03), pages 289-302, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiong Jia & Liyuan Wei & Xiaotong Li, 2019. "Visualizing Sustainability Research in Business and Management (1990–2019) and Emerging Topics: A Large-Scale Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-37, October.
    2. Francisco Ganga-Contreras & Alvaro Acuña-Hormazábal & Paulina Ceballos-Garrido & Olga Pons-Peregort & Luis Araya-Castillo, 2022. "Perception of Healthy Organizational Practices of Workers in the Chilean Educational Sector and Impact on Their Levels of Engagement and Burnout," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Chia-Wen Lee & Weidong Wu & Cheng-Fu Yang, 2019. "Employees’ Perceptions of Training and Sustainability of Human Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-11, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    3. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Tamás Bányai & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan, 2019. "An Examination of Sustainable HRM Practices on Job Performance: An Application of Training as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Jihye Park & Dawoon Jung & Pyoungsoo Lee, 2019. "How to Make a Sustainable Manufacturing Process: A High-Commitment HRM System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang, 2019. "Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Human Resource Management, 1982–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Yeh, Ying-Pin, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of employee advocacy on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Case of Taiwanese airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 94-100.
    7. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 379-388.
    9. Dan S. Chiaburu & Subrata Chakrabarty & Jiexin Wang & Ning Li, 2015. "Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 707-736, October.
    10. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of Emerging Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Anca-Maria Clipa & Cătălin-Ioan Clipa & Magdalena Danileț & Andreia Gabriela Andrei, 2019. "Enhancing Sustainable Employment Relationships: An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Trust in Employer and Subjective Value in Employment Contract Negotiations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Bård Kuvaas & Anders Dysvik & Robert Buch, 2014. "Antecedents and Employee Outcomes of Line Managers' Perceptions of Enabling HR Practices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 845-868, September.
    13. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Raising the Curtain in People Management by Exploring How Sustainable HRM Translates to Practice: The Case of Lithuanian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-31, November.
    14. Ermanno C. Tortia & Silvia Sacchetti & Francisco J. López-Arceiz, 2022. "A Human Growth Perspective on Sustainable HRM Practices, Worker Well-Being and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2018. "Green Human Resource Management as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Polish Young Company Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    16. KonShik Kim, 2023. "The impact of job quality on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: The moderating role of socioeconomic status," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 773-797, August.
    17. Nina Pološki Vokić, 2015. "Competitiveness and sustainability of HRM activities in Croatia –CRANET survey results," EFZG Working Papers Series 1506, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    18. Guosen Miao & Guoping Chen & Fan Wang & Anupam Kumar Das, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Shuang Ren & Guiyao Tang & Susan Jackson, 2018. "Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 769-803, September.
    20. Khwaja Abdul Naim Latifi & Seunghoo Lim, 2019. "Strategic Human Resource Management in the Afghanistan Ministry of Mines and Petroleum: A Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3550-:d:243645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.