IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1594-d214303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Li

    (Department of Management and HR, Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Center of World Water Valley and Water Ecological Civilization, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Nazir Sajjad

    (Department of Management and HR, Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Qun Wang

    (Department of Management and HR, Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Center of World Water Valley and Water Ecological Civilization, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Asadullah Muhammad Ali

    (Department of Human Resource Management, Emirates College of Technology, Abu Dhabi 41009, UAE
    Lahore Business School (LBS), University of Lahore, Lahore 53700, Pakistan)

  • Zeb Khaqan

    (Department of Management Sciences, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering, Science and Technology, Topi. Swabi. KPK. 23640, Pakistan)

  • Shafi Amina

    (Department of Management and HR, Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to examine how transformational leaders boost their followers’ innovative work behavior through trust in a leader, empowerment, and work engagement. Data were collected from 281 multinational organization employees in China. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) macro process was utilized to test the proposed hypothesis. The findings revealed that transformational leadership and work engagement were significantly related to innovative work behavior. The findings also demonstrated the significant impact of transformational leadership on trust in a leader, and its subsequent positive impact on the work engagement of the employees. Furthermore, the results supported a significant serial mediation between transformational leadership, trust, work engagement, and employees’ innovative behavior. The results also showed a significant moderating effect of empowerment on transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. For boosting employees’ innovative work behavior, leaders in the organization should strive to engage them effectively in their work by gaining their trust, which could help them participate in creative activities. This is the key study to investigate the different perspectives of how transformational leadership can stimulate followers’ innovative behavior through trust in the leader and work engagement within the Chinese organizational context.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Li & Nazir Sajjad & Qun Wang & Asadullah Muhammad Ali & Zeb Khaqan & Shafi Amina, 2019. "Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1594-:d:214303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sajeet Pradhan & Rabindra Kumar Pradhan, 2015. "An Empirical Investigation of Relationship among Transformational Leadership, Affective Organizational Commitment and Contextual Performance," Vision, , vol. 19(3), pages 227-235, September.
    2. Gumusluoglu, Lale & Ilsev, Arzu, 2009. "Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 461-473, April.
    3. Chieh-Peng Lin, 2010. "Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(4), pages 517-531, July.
    4. Woocheol Kim & Jiwon Park, 2017. "Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Ismail, Azman & Mohamed, Hasan Al-Banna & Sulaiman, Ahmad Zaidi & Mohamad, Mohd Hamran & Yusuf, Munirah Hanim, 2011. "An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership, Empowerment and Organizational Commitment," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 2(1), pages 1-89, January.
    6. Sajjad Nazir & Wang Qun & Li Hui & Amina Shafi, 2018. "Influence of Social Exchange Relationships on Affective Commitment and Innovative Behavior: Role of Perceived Organizational Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Cam Caldwell & Rolf Dixon, 2010. "Love, Forgiveness, and Trust: Critical Values of the Modern Leader," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 91-101, April.
    8. Van de Ven, Andrew R., 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Agricultural Research Policy Seminar 139708, University of Minnesota Extension.
    9. Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 590-607, May.
    10. Amy C. Edmondson, 2003. "Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1419-1452, September.
    11. Jane E. Dutton & Susan J. Ashford & Regina M. O’ Neill & Erika Hayes & Elizabeth E. Wierba, 1997. "Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 407-423, May.
    12. Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin, 2008. "The Meaning of Employee Engagement," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-30, March.
    13. Karen Handley & Andrew Sturdy & Robin Fincham & Timothy Clark, 2006. "Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning Through Participation, Identity and Practice," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 641-653, May.
    14. Liviu Florea & Yu Cheung & Neil Herndon, 2013. "For All Good Reasons: Role of Values in Organizational Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 393-408, May.
    15. Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Florence Ling & Arun Bajracharya, 2003. "Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 307-318.
    16. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    17. Annamaria Di Fabio & José María Peiró, 2018. "Human Capital Sustainability Leadership to Promote Sustainable Development and Healthy Organizations: A New Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    18. Wang, Chung-Jen & Tsai, Huei-Ting & Tsai, Ming-Tien, 2014. "Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 79-89.
    19. Chowhan, James & Pries, Fred & Mann, Sara, 2017. "Persistent innovation and the role of human resource management practices, work organization, and strategy," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 456-471, May.
    20. Sajeet Pradhan & Lalatendu Kesari Jena, 2019. "Does Meaningful Work Explains the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour?," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 44(1), pages 30-40, March.
    21. Julian Gould-Williams & Fiona Davies, 2005. "Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of hrm practice on employee outcomes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    22. De Clercq, Dirk & Dimov, Dimo & Thongpapanl, Narongsak (Tek), 2010. "The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 87-103, January.
    23. Michelle C. Bligh, 2017. "Leadership and Trust," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Joan Marques & Satinder Dhiman (ed.), Leadership Today, chapter 2, pages 21-42, Springer.
    24. Javed, Basharat & Raza Naqvi, Sayyed Muhammad Mehdi & Khan, Abdul Karim & Arjoon, Surendra & Tayyeb, Hafiz Habib, 2017. "Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety – CORRIGENDUM," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 472-472, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Gopesh Anand & John Gray & Enno Siemsen, 2012. "Decay, Shock, and Renewal: Operational Routines and Process Entropy in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1700-1716, December.
    3. Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan & Jacob Wood & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2016. "Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Rana Sawaya & Donabelle Zakkour Tabchoury & Marc Bonnet, 2018. "Riding the Roller-Coaster of the Accreditation Process at Higher Education Institutions through Employees Engagement," Post-Print hal-01907980, HAL.
    5. Dirk De Clercq & Dimo Dimov & Imanol Belausteguigoitia, 2016. "Perceptions of Adverse Work Conditions and Innovative Behavior: The Buffering Roles of Relational Resources," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(3), pages 515-542, May.
    6. Rawan Alafeshat & Cem Tanova, 2019. "Servant Leadership Style and High-Performance Work System Practices: Pathway to a Sustainable Jordanian Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Sandeep Vij & Harpreet Singh Bedi, 2016. "Effect Of Organisational And Environmental Factors On Innovativeness And Business Performance Relationship," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Sarooghi, Hessamoddin & Libaers, Dirk & Burkemper, Andrew, 2015. "Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 714-731.
    9. Reem S. Al-Mansoori & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Transformational Leadership, Systems, and Intrinsic Motivation Impacts on Innovation in Higher Education Institutes: Faculty Perspectives in Engineering Colleges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Naveed Anwer & Farooq Ahmad & Maqsood Ahmad & Saqib Jamil, 2021. "Review On Leader Member Exchange (Lmx), Perceived Hrm Practices And Work Behaviors: A Nexus For Performance €“ Addressing The Missing Links In The Context Of Developing World," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 216-225.
    11. Tomasz Gigol, 2020. "Influence of Authentic Leadership on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Intermediate Role of Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    12. García-Morales, Víctor Jesús & Jiménez-Barrionuevo, María Magdalena & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Leopoldo, 2012. "Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1040-1050.
    13. Jeroen de Jong & Sander Wennekers, 2008. "Intrapreneurship; Conceptualizing entrepreneurial employee behaviour," Scales Research Reports H200802, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    14. Mohammed Afandi Zainal & Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, 2021. "The Influence of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and School Leaders’ Transformational Leadership Practices on Teachers’ Innovative Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Seung Hoon Jang & Sang M. Lee & Taewan Kim & Donghyun Choi, 2019. "Planting and harvesting innovation - an analysis of Samsung Electronics," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Afsheen Fatima & Muhammad Asif Khan, 2017. "Do Hope Foster Innovative Work Behavior through Employee Engagement and Knowledge Sharing Behavior? A Conservation of Resources Approach Using MPLUS tool," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(4), pages 181-212, December.
    17. Wookjoon Sung & Changil Kim, 2021. "A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Lalatendu Kesari Jena, 2016. "Workplace Spirituality and Employee Job Behaviour," Paradigm, , vol. 20(2), pages 159-175, December.
    19. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    20. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1594-:d:214303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.