IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i12p3264-d239409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses of a Combined Power Producing System including a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell and an Organic Rankine Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • S. M. Seyed Mahmoudi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-14766, Iran)

  • Niloufar Sarabchi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-14766, Iran)

  • Mortaza Yari

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-14766, Iran)

  • Marc A. Rosen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

Abstract

Comprehensive exergy and exergoeconomic assessments are reported for a proposed power producing system, in which an organic Rankine cycle is employed to utilize the waste heat from the fuel cell stack. A complete mathematical model is presented for simulating the system performance while considering water management in the fuel cell. The simulation is performed for individual components of the fuel cell system, e.g., the compressor and humidifiers. A parametric study is conducted to evaluate the effects on the system’s thermodynamic and economic performance of parameters, such as the fuel cell operating pressure, current density, and turbine back pressure. The results show that an increase in the fuel cell operating pressure leads to a higher exergy efficiency and exergoeconomic factor for the overall system. In addition, it is observed that the overall exergy efficiency is 4.16% higher than the corresponding value that is obtained for the standalone fuel cell for the same value of fuel cell operating pressure. Furthermore, the results indicate that the compressor and condenser exhibit the worst exergoeconomic performance and that the exergoeconomic factor, the capital cost rate and the exergy destruction cost rate for the overall system are 40.8%, 27.21 $/h, and 39.49 $/h, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • S. M. Seyed Mahmoudi & Niloufar Sarabchi & Mortaza Yari & Marc A. Rosen, 2019. "Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses of a Combined Power Producing System including a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell and an Organic Rankine Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3264-:d:239409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayadi, Saeed & Tsatsaronis, George & Duelk, Christian, 2014. "Exergoeconomic analysis of vehicular PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell systems with and without expander," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 608-622.
    2. Leo, T.J. & Durango, J.A. & Navarro, E., 2010. "Exergy analysis of PEM fuel cells for marine applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1164-1171.
    3. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    4. Arsalis, Alexandros, 2019. "A comprehensive review of fuel cell-based micro-combined-heat-and-power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 391-414.
    5. Moreira, Marcos V. & da Silva, Gisele E., 2009. "A practical model for evaluating the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1734-1741.
    6. Tianqi He & Rongqi Shi & Jie Peng & Weilin Zhuge & Yangjun Zhang, 2016. "Waste Heat Recovery of a PEMFC System by Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Sharifi Asl, S.M. & Rowshanzamir, S. & Eikani, M.H., 2010. "Modelling and simulation of the steady-state and dynamic behaviour of a PEM fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1633-1646.
    8. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Gallorini, F. & Ottaviano, A., 2011. "An energetic–exergetic analysis of a residential CHP system based on PEM fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4334-4342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burak Yuksel & Ozgur Balli & Huseyin Gunerhan & Arif Hepbasli, 2020. "Comparative Performance Metric Assessment of A Military Turbojet Engine Utilizing Hydrogen And Kerosene Fuels Through Advanced Exergy Analysis Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Mohammed Yousri Silaa & Mohamed Derbeli & Oscar Barambones & Cristian Napole & Ali Cheknane & José María Gonzalez De Durana, 2021. "An Efficient and Robust Current Control for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Burak Yuksel & Huseyin Gunerhan & Arif Hepbasli, 2020. "Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Saeideh Mahdinia & Mehrdad Rezaie & Marischa Elveny & Noradin Ghadimi & Navid Razmjooy, 2021. "Optimization of PEMFC Model Parameters Using Meta-Heuristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Jahan Zeb Alvi & Yu Jinghu & Yongqiang Feng & Muhammad Asim & Wang Qian & Gang Pei, 2022. "Performance Assessment of Direct Vapor Generation Solar Organic Rankine Cycle System Coupled with Heat Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Hai, Tao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Abed, Hooman & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & Ahmed, Ahmed Najat, 2023. "Exergy-economic study and multi-objective optimization of a geothermal-based combined organic flash cycle and PEMFC for poly-generation purpose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    7. Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin & Balli, Ozgur, 2022. "Impact of different fuel usages on thermodynamic performances of a high bypass turbofan engine used in commercial aircraft," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    8. Mohammadi, Zahra & Ahmadi, Pouria & Ashjaee, Mehdi, 2023. "Proposal and multi-criteria optimization of a novel biomass-based and PEMfuel cell system for generating clean power for building applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    9. Atak, Nisa Nur & Dogan, Battal & Yesilyurt, Murat Kadir, 2023. "Investigation of the performance parameters for a PEMFC by thermodynamic analyses: Effects of operating temperature and pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    10. Raluca-Andreea Felseghi & Elena Carcadea & Maria Simona Raboaca & Cătălin Nicolae TRUFIN & Constantin Filote, 2019. "Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology for the Sustainable Future of Stationary Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Baroutaji & Arun Arjunan & John Robinson & Tabbi Wilberforce & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Abdul Ghani Olabi, 2021. "PEMFC Poly-Generation Systems: Developments, Merits, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    2. Sun, Zhe & Wang, Ning & Bi, Yunrui & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2015. "Parameter identification of PEMFC model based on hybrid adaptive differential evolution algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1334-1341.
    3. Jordi Renau & Víctor García & Luis Domenech & Pedro Verdejo & Antonio Real & Alberto Giménez & Fernando Sánchez & Antonio Lozano & Félix Barreras, 2021. "Novel Use of Green Hydrogen Fuel Cell-Based Combined Heat and Power Systems to Reduce Primary Energy Intake and Greenhouse Emissions in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Ghosh, P.C. & Vasudeva, U., 2011. "Analysis of 3000T class submarines equipped with polymer electrolyte fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3138-3147.
    5. Bird, Trevor J. & Jain, Neera, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and validation of a micro-combined heat and power system with integrated thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    6. Lee, Chi-Hung & Chen, Szu-Hsien & Wang, Yen-Zen & Lin, Chao-Chien & Huang, Chih-Kai & Chuang, Ching-Nan & Wang, Chih-Kuang & Hsieh, Kuo-Huang, 2013. "Preparation and characterization of proton exchange membranes based on semi-interpenetrating sulfonated poly(imide-siloxane)/epoxy polymer networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 905-915.
    7. Yang, Puqing & Zhang, Houcheng, 2015. "Parametric analysis of an irreversible proton exchange membrane fuel cell/absorption refrigerator hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 458-467.
    8. Oluleye, Gbemi & Gandiglio, Marta & Santarelli, Massimo & Hawkes, Adam, 2021. "Pathways to commercialisation of biogas fuelled solid oxide fuel cells in European wastewater treatment plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    9. Wang, Chuang & Liu, Mingkun & Li, Zengqun & Xing, Ziwen & Shu, Yue, 2023. "Performance improvement of twin-screw air expander used in PEMFC systems by two-phase expansion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    10. d'Amore-Domenech, Rafael & Leo, Teresa J. & Pollet, Bruno G., 2021. "Bulk power transmission at sea: Life cycle cost comparison of electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Mingfei Li & Jingjing Wang & Zhengpeng Chen & Xiuyang Qian & Chuanqi Sun & Di Gan & Kai Xiong & Mumin Rao & Chuangting Chen & Xi Li, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Management in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Focus on Burners, Heat Exchangers, and Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, February.
    12. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    13. Sherif A. Zaid & Ahmed M. Kassem & Aadel M. Alatwi & Hani Albalawi & Hossam AbdelMeguid & Atef Elemary, 2023. "Optimal Control of an Autonomous Microgrid Integrated with Super Magnetic Energy Storage Using an Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Pavelka, Michal & Klika, Václav & Vágner, Petr & Maršík, František, 2015. "Generalization of exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 158-172.
    15. Hossein Pourrahmani & Hamed Shakeri & Jan Van herle, 2022. "Thermoelectric Generator as the Waste Heat Recovery Unit of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell: A Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Salva, J. Antonio & Iranzo, Alfredo & Rosa, Felipe & Tapia, Elvira, 2016. "Validation of cell voltage and water content in a PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) fuel cell model using neutron imaging for different operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 100-112.
    17. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    18. Hou, Yongping & Shen, Caoyuan & Hao, Dong & Liu, Yanan & Wang, Hong, 2014. "A dynamic model for hydrogen consumption of fuel cell stacks considering the effects of hydrogen purge operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 672-678.
    19. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    20. Movahedi, M. & Ramiar, A. & Ranjber, A.A., 2018. "3D numerical investigation of clamping pressure effect on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with interdigitated flow field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 617-632.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3264-:d:239409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.