IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v65y2014icp533-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadkhani, F.
  • Shokati, N.
  • Mahmoudi, S.M.S.
  • Yari, M.
  • Rosen, M.A.

Abstract

An exergoeconomic analysis is reported for a combined system with a net electrical output of 299 MW in which waste heat from a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) is utilized by two Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs). A parametric study is also done to reveal the effects on the exergoeconomic performance of the combined system of such significant parameters as compressor pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature, temperatures of evaporators, pinch point temperature difference in the evaporators and degree of superheat at the ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) turbines inlet. Finally the combined cycle performance is optimized from the viewpoint of exergoeconomics. The results show that the precooler, the intercooler and the ORC condensers exhibit the worst exergoeconomic performance. For the overall system, the exergoeconomic factor, the capital cost rate and the exergy destruction cost rate are determined to be 37.95%, 6876 $/h and 11,242 $/h, respectively. Also, it is observed that the unit cost of electricity produced by the GT-MHR turbine increases with increasing GT-MHR turbine inlet temperature but decreases as the other above mentioned parameters increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:533-543
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421300964X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsatsaronis, George & Pisa, Javier, 1994. "Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems — application to the CGAM problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 287-321.
    2. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    3. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    4. Baskut, Omer & Ozgener, Leyla, 2012. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a wind turbine power plant (WTTP): Cesme, Izmir, example," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 577-581.
    5. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    6. Cardona, E. & Piacentino, A., 2006. "A new approach to exergoeconomic analysis and design of variable demand energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 490-515.
    7. Tsatsaronis, George, 2007. "Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 249-253.
    8. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    9. Mert, Mehmet Selçuk & Dilmaç, Ömer Faruk & Özkan, Semra & Karaca, Fatma & Bolat, Esen, 2012. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration plant in an iron and steel factory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 78-84.
    10. Rezayan, Omid & Behbahaninia, Ali, 2011. "Thermoeconomic optimization and exergy analysis of CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 888-895.
    11. Bagdanavicius, Audrius & Jenkins, Nick & Hammond, Geoffrey P., 2012. "Assessment of community energy supply systems using energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 247-255.
    12. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2010. "Exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a cogeneration plant system using Multimodal Genetic Algorithm (MGA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5161-5172.
    13. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5886-5898.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "A comparative study on the ammonia–water based bottoming power cycles: The exergoeconomic viewpoint," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 425-434.
    2. Agudelo, Andrés & Valero, Antonio & Torres, César, 2012. "Allocation of waste cost in thermoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 634-643.
    3. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    4. Alkan, Mehmet Ali & Keçebaş, Ali & Yamankaradeniz, Nurettin, 2013. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a district heating system for geothermal energy using specific exergy cost method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 426-434.
    5. Luo, Xianglong & Hu, Jiahao & Zhao, Jun & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2014. "Improved exergoeconomic analysis of a retrofitted natural gas-based cogeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 459-475.
    6. Gürtürk, Mert & Oztop, Hakan F. & Hepbasli, Arif, 2015. "Comparison of exergoeconomic analysis of two different perlite expansion furnaces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 589-598.
    7. Naser Shokati & Farzad Mohammadkhani & Mortaza Yari & Seyed M. S. Mahmoudi & Marc A. Rosen, 2014. "A Comparative Exergoeconomic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor via Organic Rankine Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Ligang Wang & Yongping Yang & Changqing Dong & Zhiping Yang & Gang Xu & Lingnan Wu, 2012. "Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Modern Ultra-Supercritical Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    10. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    11. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    12. Lara, Yolanda & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Morosuk, Tatiana & Boyano, Alicia & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "An exergy-based study on the relationship between costs and environmental impacts in power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 920-928.
    13. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    14. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    15. Pirmohamadi, Alireza & Ghazi, Mehrangiz & Nikian, Mohammad, 2019. "Optimal design of cogeneration systems in total site using exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1291-1302.
    16. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Scenna, Nicolás J., 2011. "Optimal synthesis and design of Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) via mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 475-485.
    17. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.
    18. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Wu, Jing, 2017. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling and analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with biomass-steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 871-882.
    19. Wang, Jiangjiang & Li, Meng & Ren, Fukang & Li, Xiaojing & Liu, Boxiang, 2018. "Modified exergoeconomic analysis method based on energy level with reliability consideration: Cost allocations in a biomass trigeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 104-116.
    20. Şöhret, Yasin & Açıkkalp, Emin & Hepbasli, Arif & Karakoc, T. Hikmet, 2015. "Advanced exergy analysis of an aircraft gas turbine engine: Splitting exergy destructions into parts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1219-1228.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:533-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.