IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i8p1000-d1445947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burnout and Attention Failure in STEM: The Role of Self-Control and the Buffer of Mindfulness

Author

Listed:
  • Mahima Saxena

    (Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, 6001 Dodge St. ASH 347, Omaha, NE 68182, USA)

Abstract

Drawing on self-regulatory strength models of self-control, this research examined the relationship between burnout and attentional processes for STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) students. Using data from participants in STEM, burnout was found to be associated with higher levels of off-task thinking, also known as mind-wandering. Further, self-control acted as a mediator in the relationship between burnout and mind-wandering such that higher levels of burnout predicted poor self-control that subsequently increased the mind’s tendency to wander. Additionally, mindfulness buffered the relationship between burnout and mind-wandering such that burnout had the most detrimental impact on attention for those students who were low in mindfulness. Using the Johnson-Neyman approach, results reveal the upper limits for the moderating impact of mindfulness. Results and implications for science and practice are discussed with a special grounding for students in the STEM context.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahima Saxena, 2024. "Burnout and Attention Failure in STEM: The Role of Self-Control and the Buffer of Mindfulness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:1000-:d:1445947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/1000/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/1000/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silver, William S. & Mitchell, Terence R. & Gist, Marilyn E., 1995. "Responses to Successful and Unsuccessful Performance: The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Performance and Attributions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 286-299, June.
    2. Martin Sanchez-Gomez & Edgar Breso, 2020. "In Pursuit of Work Performance: Testing the Contribution of Emotional Intelligence and Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Dela M van Dijk & Willem van Rhenen & Jaap M J Murre & Esmée Verwijk, 2020. "Cognitive functioning, sleep quality, and work performance in non-clinical burnout: The role of working memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Gloria Guidetti & Sara Viotti & Rosa Badagliacca & Lara Colombo & Daniela Converso, 2019. "Can mindfulness mitigate the energy-depleting process and increase job resources to prevent burnout? A study on the mindfulness trait in the school context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Sandy Staples & John S. Hulland & Christopher A. Higgins, 1999. "A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 758-776, December.
    2. Martin Sanchez-Gomez & Gabriele Giorgi & Georgia Libera Finstad & Flavio Urbini & Giulia Foti & Nicola Mucci & Salvatore Zaffina & José M. León-Perez, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic as a Traumatic Event and Its Associations with Fear and Mental Health: A Cognitive-Activation Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    4. Matteo Cristofaro & Pier Luigi Giardino, 2020. "Core Self-Evaluations, Self-Leadership, and the Self-Serving Bias in Managerial Decision Making: A Laboratory Experiment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Lu, Xinxin & Xie, Baoguo & Guo, Yongxing, 2018. "The trickle-down of work engagement from leader to follower: The roles of optimism and self-efficacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 186-195.
    6. Reeko Watanabe & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2020. "Does Haze Drive Pro-Environmental and Energy Conservation Behaviors? Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Ravindra K. Jain, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Competencies," Vision, , vol. 15(2), pages 127-152, June.
    8. Gloria Guidetti & Annalisa Grandi & Daniela Converso & Nicoletta Bosco & Stefania Fantinelli & Margherita Zito & Lara Colombo, 2021. "Funeral and Mortuary Operators: The Role of Stigma, Incivility, Work Meaningfulness and Work–Family Relation to Explain Occupational Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Au, Kevin & Chan, Forrest & Wang, Denis & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2003. "Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 322-338, July.
    10. Rudy M. Ramdhan & Daniel Kisahwan & Alex Winarno & Deni Hermana, 2022. "Internal Corporate Social Responsibility as a Microfoundation of Employee Well-Being and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Dai, Hengchen, 2018. "A double-edged sword: How and why resetting performance metrics affects motivation and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 12-29.
    12. Dwi Indriastuti & Olivia Fachrunnisa, 2021. "Achieving Organizational Change: Preparing Individuals to Change and their Impact on Performance," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 377-391, September.
    13. Jin, Xiao-Ling & Zhou, Zhongyun & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Cheung, Christy M.K., 2013. "Why users keep answering questions in online question answering communities: A theoretical and empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 93-104.
    14. Maertz, Carl Jr. & Bauer, Talya N. & Mosley, Donald Jr. & Posthuma, Richard A. & Campion, Michael A., 2005. "Predictors of self-efficacy for cognitive ability employment testing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 160-167, February.
    15. Horvath, Michael & Ryan, Ann Marie & Stierwalt, Sandra L., 2000. "The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 310-330, November.
    16. Lingwei Cheng & Chien-Chung Huang & Sophie Sitar, 2023. "Mindfulness and job performance in Chinese nonprofit workers: mediation effects of PANA and work engagement," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Lara C. Roll & Hans De Witte & Hai-Jiang Wang, 2023. "Conceptualization and Validation of the Occupation Insecurity Scale (OCIS): Measuring Employees’ Occupation Insecurity Due to Automation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-26, January.
    18. Reina, Christopher S. & Kudesia, Ravi S., 2020. "Wherever you go, there you become: How mindfulness arises in everyday situations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 78-96.
    19. Heetae Park & Wonseok Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2020. "When Is the Negative Effect of Abusive Supervision on Task Performance Mitigated? An Empirical Study of Public Service Officers in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-10, June.
    20. Ployhart, Robert E. & Ryan, Ann Marie, 1997. "Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 308-335, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:1000-:d:1445947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.