IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v72y1997i3p308-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Ployhart, Robert E.
  • Ryan, Ann Marie

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ployhart, Robert E. & Ryan, Ann Marie, 1997. "Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 308-335, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:72:y:1997:i:3:p:308-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(97)92742-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Northcraft, Gregory B. & Ashford, Susan J., 1990. "The preservation of self in everyday life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 42-64, October.
    2. Silver, William S. & Mitchell, Terence R. & Gist, Marilyn E., 1995. "Responses to Successful and Unsuccessful Performance: The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Performance and Attributions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 286-299, June.
    3. Sweeney, Paul D. & McFarlin, Dean B., 1993. "Workers' Evaluations of the "Ends" and the "Means": An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural Justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 23-40, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horvath, Michael & Ryan, Ann Marie & Stierwalt, Sandra L., 2000. "The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 310-330, November.
    2. van den Bos, Kees, 2002. "Assimilation and contrast in organizational justice: The role of primed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 866-880, September.
    3. Şaban ESEN & Aslı ÇİLLİOĞLU KARADEMİR, 2014. "A Study of Relatıonship between Perceived Organızational Justice and Individualism Collectivism Values Among Academic Staff," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(5), pages 400-410.
    4. Brockner, Joel & Heuer, Larry & Magner, Nace & Folger, Robert & Umphress, Elizabeth & van den Bos, Kees & Vermunt, Riel & Magner, Mary & Siegel, Phyllis, 2003. "High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 51-68, May.
    5. Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara & Martínez, Eva, 2020. "Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 41-50.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    2. D. Sandy Staples & John S. Hulland & Christopher A. Higgins, 1999. "A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 758-776, December.
    3. Lambert, Eric, 2003. "The impact of organizational justice on correctional staff," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-168.
    4. Mor Barak, Michalle E. & Levin, Amy & Nissly, Jan A. & Lane, Christianne J., 2006. "Why do they leave? Modeling child welfare workers' turnover intentions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 548-577, May.
    5. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    6. De Stobbeleir,K. & Ashford, S. & Sully De Luque, M.F., 2008. "how is feedback-seeking behavior interpreted? the influence of feedback-seeking pattern and feedback source’s characteristics on impression formation and performance evaluations," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2008-11, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    7. Dulebohn, James H. & Conlon, Donald E. & Sarinopoulos, Issidoros & Davison, Robert B. & McNamara, Gerry, 2009. "The biological bases of unfairness: Neuroimaging evidence for the distinctiveness of procedural and distributive justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 140-151, November.
    8. Matteo Cristofaro & Pier Luigi Giardino, 2020. "Core Self-Evaluations, Self-Leadership, and the Self-Serving Bias in Managerial Decision Making: A Laboratory Experiment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Lu, Xinxin & Xie, Baoguo & Guo, Yongxing, 2018. "The trickle-down of work engagement from leader to follower: The roles of optimism and self-efficacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 186-195.
    10. Reeko Watanabe & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2020. "Does Haze Drive Pro-Environmental and Energy Conservation Behaviors? Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1, November.
    11. Ravindra K. Jain, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Competencies," Vision, , vol. 15(2), pages 127-152, June.
    12. Podsakoff, Philip M. & Bommer, William H. & Podsakoff, Nathan P. & MacKenzie, Scott B., 2006. "Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 113-142, March.
    13. Au, Kevin & Chan, Forrest & Wang, Denis & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2003. "Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 322-338, July.
    14. Bianchi, Emily C. & Brockner, Joel, 2012. "In the eyes of the beholder? The role of dispositional trust in judgments of procedural and interactional fairness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 46-59.
    15. K. E. M. De Stobbeleir & S. J. Ashford & D. Buyens, 2008. "Feedback-Seeking Behavior as a Self-Regulation Strategy for Creative Performance," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/533, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    16. DeConinck, James B., 2009. "The effect of leader-member exchange on turnover among retail buyers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1081-1086, November.
    17. Ambrose, Maureen & Hess, Ronald L. & Ganesan, Shankar, 2007. "The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on event and system-related attitudes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 21-36, May.
    18. Dai, Hengchen, 2018. "A double-edged sword: How and why resetting performance metrics affects motivation and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 12-29.
    19. Dwi Indriastuti & Olivia Fachrunnisa, 2021. "Achieving Organizational Change: Preparing Individuals to Change and their Impact on Performance," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 377-391, September.
    20. Wei Zhang & Xuejun Wang & Dingnan Xie, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of Positive Implicit Followership towards Employees’ Feedback-Seeking: Based on the Social Information Processing Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:72:y:1997:i:3:p:308-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.