IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p2071-d502752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Sampling Bias in Research on Work-Related Technostress? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Technostress and the Role of Socioeconomic Position

Author

Listed:
  • Prem Borle

    (Institute of Occupational Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Kathrin Reichel

    (Independent researcher in occupational health, 10245 Berlin, Germany)

  • Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht

    (Institute of Occupational Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Technostress is a widespread model used to study negative effects of using information communication technologies at work. The aim of this review is to assess the role of socioeconomic position (SEP) in research on work-related technostress. We conducted systematic searches in multidisciplinary databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, PsycArticles) in June 2020 and independently screened 321 articles against eligibility criteria (working population, technostress exposure, health or work outcome, quantitative design). Of the 21 studies included in the narrative synthesis, three studies did not collect data on SEP, while 18 studies operationalised SEP as education (eight), job position (five), SEP itself (two) or both education as well as job position (three). Findings regarding differences by SEP are inconclusive, with evidence of high SEP reporting more frequent exposure to overall technostress. In a subsample of 11 studies reporting data on educational attainment, we compared the percentage of university graduates to World Bank national statistics and found that workers with high SEP are overrepresented in nine of 11 studies. The resulting socioeconomic sampling bias limits the scope of the technostress model to high SEP occupations. The lack of findings regarding differences by SEP in technostress can partly be attributed to limitations in study designs. Studies should aim to reduce the heterogeneity of technostress and SEP measures to improve external validity and generalisability across socioeconomic groups. Future research on technostress would benefit from developing context-sensitive SEP measures and quality appraisal tools that identify socioeconomic sampling biases by comparing data to national statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "Is There a Sampling Bias in Research on Work-Related Technostress? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Technostress and the Role of Socioeconomic Position," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2071-:d:502752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armin Granulo & Christoph Fuchs & Stefano Puntoni, 2019. "Psychological reactions to human versus robotic job replacement," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 1062-1069, October.
    2. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    3. Nathalie Colombier & Ludivine Martin & Thierry Pénard, 2007. "Usage des TIC, conditions de travail et satisfaction des salariés," Post-Print halshs-00176005, HAL.
    4. Khedhaouria, Anis & Cucchi, Alain, 2019. "Technostress creators, personality traits, and job burnout: A fuzzy-set configurational analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 349-361.
    5. Jelke Bethlehem, 2010. "Selection Bias in Web Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(2), pages 161-188, August.
    6. repec:hal:gemptp:hal-01249895 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ahonen, E.Q. & Fujishiro, K. & Cunningham, T. & Flynn, M., 2018. "Work as an inclusive part of population health inequities research and prevention," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(3), pages 306-311.
    8. Gabriel Popkin, 2019. "How scientists can team up with big tech," Nature, Nature, vol. 565(7741), pages 665-667, January.
    9. Kim, Hyeon Jeong & Lee, Choong C. & Yun, Haejung & Im, Kun Shin, 2015. "An examination of work exhaustion in the mobile enterprise environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 255-266.
    10. Stefan Tams & Kevin Hill, 2017. "Helping an Old Workforce Interact with Modern IT: A NeuroIS Approach to Understanding Technostress and Technology Use in Older Workers," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 19-26, Springer.
    11. Jinnan Wu & Nannan Wang & Wenjuan Mei & Lin Liu, 2020. "Technology-induced job anxiety during non-work time: examining conditional effect of techno-invasion on job anxiety," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 162-182.
    12. Thomas Haipeter, 2020. "Digitalisation, unions and participation: the German case of ‘industry 4.0’," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 242-260, May.
    13. Henrik Schwabe & Fulvio Castellacci, 2020. "Automation, workers’ skills and job satisfaction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, November.
    14. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    15. Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Shirish C. Srivastava & Shalini Chandra & Anuragini Shirish, 2015. "Technostress creators and job outcomes : theorising the moderating influence of personality traits," Post-Print hal-01249895, HAL.
    17. Alam, Muhammad Aftab, 2016. "Techno-stress and productivity: Survey evidence from the aviation industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 62-70.
    18. Wajcman, Judy, 2017. "Automation: is it really different this time?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69811, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louisa Scheepers & Peter Angerer & Nico Dragano, 2022. "Digitalisation in Craft Enterprises: Perceived Technostress, Readiness for Prevention and Countermeasures—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Fiona Niebuhr & Prem Borle & Franziska Börner-Zobel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2022. "Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Fiona Niebuhr & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Nicola Mucci & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2022. "The Dark Side and the Light Side of Technology-Related Stress and Stress Related to Workplace Innovations: From Artificial Intelligence to Business Transformations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-5, January.
    6. Mehmet Akif Çini & Meral Erdirençelebi & Abdullah Zübeyr Akman, 2023. "The Effect of Organization Employees' Perspective on Digital Transformation on Their Technostress Levels and Performance: A Public Institution Example," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 33-57.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Fiona Niebuhr & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Torres, Carla Cecilia, 2021. "Adaptation and Validation of Technostress Creators and Technostress Inhibitors Inventories in a Spanish-Speaking Latin American Country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Khedhaouria, Anis & Montani, Francesco & Jamal, Arshad & Hussain Shah, Mahmood, 2024. "Consequences of technostress for users in remote (home) work contexts during a time of crisis: The buffering role of emotional social support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Singh, Pallavi & Bala, Hillol & Dey, Bidit Lal & Filieri, Raffaele, 2022. "Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 269-286.
    6. Issa, Helmi & Jaber, Jad & Lakkis, Hussein, 2024. "Navigating AI unpredictability: Exploring technostress in AI-powered healthcare systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Min Feng & Driss Bourazzouq, 2021. "Effects of Technostress in the Role Stress Context on Proximity Managers' Performance," Post-Print hal-03233176, HAL.
    8. Christ-Brendemühl, Sonja & Schaarschmidt, Mario, 2020. "The impact of service employees’ technostress on customer satisfaction and delight: A dyadic analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 378-388.
    9. Reetta Oksa & Tiina Saari & Markus Kaakinen & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "The Motivations for and Well-Being Implications of Social Media Use at Work among Millennials and Members of Former Generations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Óscar. R. González-López & María Buenadicha-Mateos & M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández, 2021. "Overwhelmed by Technostress? Sensitive Archetypes and Effects in Times of Forced Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Min Feng & Driss Bourazzouq, 2021. "Effects of Technostress in the Role Stress Context on Proximity Managers’ Performance," Post-Print hal-03233171, HAL.
    13. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    15. Nascimento, Lígia & Correia, Manuela Faia & Califf, Christopher B., 2024. "Towards a bright side of technostress in higher education teachers: Identifying several antecedents and outcomes of techno-eustress," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Aini Farmania & Riska Dwinda Elsyah & Ananda Fortunisa, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Technostress during the COVID-19 Pandemic Due to Work from Home in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Chiara Consiglio & Nicoletta Massa & Valentina Sommovigo & Luigi Fusco, 2023. "Techno-Stress Creators, Burnout and Psychological Health among Remote Workers during the Pandemic: The Moderating Role of E-Work Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Cao, Xiongfei & Yu, Lingling, 2019. "Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 83-92.
    19. María del Carmen Rey-Merchán & Antonio López-Arquillos, 2022. "Occupational Risk of Technostress Related to the Use of ICT among Teachers in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    20. Muhammad Mudassar Shahid & Waleed Khalid, 2024. "Unscrambling the Digital Dilemma: Navigating Techno-Stress in Pakistan's Banking Realm - A Journey into the Interplay of Thoughts, Emotions, and Commitments," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 825-837.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2071-:d:502752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.