IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8013-d437823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgia Bondanini

    (Department of Human Science, Università Europea di Roma, 00163 Roma, Italy)

  • Gabriele Giorgi

    (Department of Human Science, Università Europea di Roma, 00163 Roma, Italy)

  • Antonio Ariza-Montes

    (Social Matters Research Group, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Alejandro Vega-Muñoz

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile)

  • Paola Andreucci-Annunziata

    (Faculty of Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Education Research Center, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Santiago 8370993, Chile)

Abstract

This article aims to provide a critical review of the scientific research on technostress. As such, global references in this field are identified and highlighted in order to manage pre-existing knowledge and establish future ‘bridges’ among researchers, and to enhance the presently dispersed understanding of this subject. A scientometric meta-analysis of publications on technostress was conducted to achieve this objective. Mainstream journals from the Web of Science (WoS) were used to identify current topics, relevant journals, prolific authors, institutions, and countries, ‘schools of thought’ and the thematic areas around which current technostress debate revolves. In this article a significant contribution comes from the use of the scientific activity itself, together with scientometric meta-analysis techniques and the application of this scientific activity, its impact and relational character, to discover relevant countries, research organizations and authors which can constitute a global reference to demarcate this knowledge frontier, and who lead the ‘critical mass’ of global technostress researchers. This study also distinguishes between the relevant themes studied, with co-keywords plus bibliographic coupling citation, and examines the kind of stress the most prolific authors have considered and, therefore, to discover those topics which should be studied further to deepen this research field, in search of a post-disciplinary knowledge that allows unity of focus in technology and psychology.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8013-:d:437823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martínez-Córcoles, Mario & Teichmann, Mare & Murdvee, Mart, 2017. "Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 183-188.
    2. Lieli Suharti & Agung Susanto, 2014. "The Impact of Workload and Technology Competence on Technostress and Performance of Employees," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 5(2), pages 01-07, May.
    3. Bach Xuan Tran & Son Nghiem & Clifford Afoakwah & Carl A. Latkin & Giang Hai Ha & Thao Phuong Nguyen & Linh Phuong Doan & Hai Quang Pham & Cyrus S.H. Ho & Roger C.M. Ho, 2019. "Characterizing Obesity Interventions and Treatment for Children and Youths During 1991–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Kim, Hyeon Jeong & Lee, Choong C. & Yun, Haejung & Im, Kun Shin, 2015. "An examination of work exhaustion in the mobile enterprise environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 255-266.
    5. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López‐Herrera & E. Herrera‐Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    6. Gangan Prathap, 2019. "Letter to the editor: Revisiting the h-index and the p-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1829-1833, December.
    7. Frenken, Koen & Hardeman, Sjoerd & Hoekman, Jarno, 2009. "Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 222-232.
    8. Duncan J. Watts & Steven H. Strogatz, 1998. "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6684), pages 440-442, June.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7048 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    11. Gema Albort-Morant & Jörg Henseler & Antonio Leal-Millán & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión, 2017. "Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. R. D. Shelton, 2020. "Scientometric laws connecting publication counts to national research funding," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 181-206, April.
    13. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    14. Gyula Mester, 2016. "Rankings scientists, journals and countries using h-index," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9.
    15. Nuno Crespo & Nadia Simoes, 2019. "Publication Performance Through the Lens of the h‐index: How Can We Solve the Problem of the Ties?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(6), pages 2495-2506, October.
    16. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    17. Laura Serrano & Antonio Sianes & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2019. "Using Bibliometric Methods to Shed Light on the Concept of Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    18. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    19. repec:hal:gemptp:hal-01249895 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Philip M. Morse & Ferdinand F. Leimkuhler, 1979. "Technical Note—Exact Solution for the Bradford Distribution and Its Use in Modeling Informational Data," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 187-198, February.
    21. Jean-François Stich & Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary Cooper & Patrick Stacey, 2017. "Workplace stress from actual and desired computer-­mediated communication use: a multi-­method study," Post-Print hal-01515123, HAL.
    22. Park, Namkee & Roman, Raul & Lee, Seungyoon & Chung, Jae Eun, 2009. "User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 196-209.
    23. Shirish C. Srivastava & Shalini Chandra & Anuragini Shirish, 2015. "Technostress creators and job outcomes : theorising the moderating influence of personality traits," Post-Print hal-01249895, HAL.
    24. Cao, Xiongfei & Yu, Lingling, 2019. "Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 83-92.
    25. Jean-François Stich & Monideepa Tarafdar & Patrick Stacey & Cary L. Cooper, 2019. "E-mail load, workload stress and desired e-mail load: a cybernetic approach," Post-Print hal-01881947, HAL.
    26. Nathalie Hauk & Anja S Göritz & Stefan Krumm, 2019. "The mediating role of coping behavior on the age-technostress relationship: A longitudinal multilevel mediation model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    27. Lutz Bornmann & Hans‐Dieter Daniel, 2007. "What do we know about the h index?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(9), pages 1381-1385, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ho, Manh-Tung & Mantello, Peter & Ghotbi, Nader & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Nguyen, Hong-Kong T. & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Joan Boada-Grau, 2021. "Technostress of Chilean Teachers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Teleworking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Mikołajczyk Katarzyna, 2024. "Digital well-being of managers in the hybrid workplace," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 60(1), pages 138-153.
    4. Peter Mantello & Manh-Tung Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Fiona Niebuhr & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. María del Carmen Rey-Merchán & Antonio López-Arquillos, 2022. "Occupational Risk of Technostress Related to the Use of ICT among Teachers in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Ştefan-Alexandru Catană & Sorin-George Toma & Andreea Barbu, 2021. "The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Teleworking and Education in a Romanian Higher Education Institution: An Internal Stakeholders Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Reetta Oksa & Tiina Saari & Markus Kaakinen & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "The Motivations for and Well-Being Implications of Social Media Use at Work among Millennials and Members of Former Generations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Vinoi, Nivin & Shankar, Amit & Mehrotra, Ankit & Kumar, Jitender & Azad, Nasreen, 2024. "Enablers and inhibitors of digital hoarding behaviour. An application of dual-factor theory and regret theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "Is There a Sampling Bias in Research on Work-Related Technostress? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Technostress and the Role of Socioeconomic Position," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Melania S. Banaticla & Antonio R. Yango, 2023. "Technostress, anxiety, and coping strategies in online teaching among nurse educators," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 44(1), pages 416-435, June.
    13. Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Nicola Mucci & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2022. "The Dark Side and the Light Side of Technology-Related Stress and Stress Related to Workplace Innovations: From Artificial Intelligence to Business Transformations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-5, January.
    14. Emanuela Ingusci & Fulvio Signore & Claudio Giovanni Cortese & Monica Molino & Paola Pasca & Enrico Ciavolino, 2023. "Development and validation of the Remote Working Benefits & Disadvantages scale," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1159-1183, April.
    15. Tong, Tong & Wang, Wanru & Ye, Fred Y., 2024. "A complement to the novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    16. Óscar. R. González-López & María Buenadicha-Mateos & M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández, 2021. "Overwhelmed by Technostress? Sensitive Archetypes and Effects in Times of Forced Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Issa, Helmi & Jaber, Jad & Lakkis, Hussein, 2024. "Navigating AI unpredictability: Exploring technostress in AI-powered healthcare systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata & Nicolas Contreras-Barraza & Heidi Bilbao-Cotal, 2022. "Validation of a Measurement Scale on Technostress for University Students in Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paloma Gónzalez-Gómez-del-Miño & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia, 2021. "Recognizing New Trends in Brain Drain Studies in the Framework of Global Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, 2020. "Analysis of Hospitality, Leisure, and Tourism Studies in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Weisheng Chiu & Thomas Chun Man Fan & Sang-Back Nam & Ping-Hung Sun, 2021. "Knowledge Mapping and Sustainable Development of eSports Research: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    5. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Gallego-Losada, María-Jesús & Montero-Navarro, Antonio & García-Abajo, Elisa & Gallego-Losada, Rocío, 2023. "Digital financial inclusion. Visualizing the academic literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Nascimento, Lígia & Correia, Manuela Faia & Califf, Christopher B., 2024. "Towards a bright side of technostress in higher education teachers: Identifying several antecedents and outcomes of techno-eustress," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Hull, Simon Antony, 2024. "All for one and one for all? Exploring the nexus of land administration, land management and land governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Margarida Rodrigues & Cidália Oliveira & MárioFranco & Ana Daniel, 2024. "A Bibliometric Study About the Rural Creative Class: Proposal of a Conceptual Framework and Future Agenda," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15278-15303, September.
    12. Vanessa Ioannoni & Tommaso Vitale & Corrado Costa & Iris Elliott, 2020. "Depicting communities of Romani studies: on the who, when and where of Roma related scientific publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1473-1490, March.
    13. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Vlaisavljevic, Vesna & Cabello-Medina, Carmen, 2023. "Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Gallego-Losada, Rocío & Montero-Navarro, Antonio & Rodríguez-Sánchez, José-Luis & González-Torres, Thais, 2022. "Retirement planning and financial literacy, at the crossroads. A bibliometric analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    15. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    16. Rocío González-Sánchez & Sara Alonso-Muñoz & María-Sonia Medina-Salgado & María Torrejón-Ramos, 2023. "Driving circular tourism pathways in the post-pandemic period: a research roadmap," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(3), pages 633-668, September.
    17. Singh, Pallavi & Bala, Hillol & Dey, Bidit Lal & Filieri, Raffaele, 2022. "Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 269-286.
    18. Rongrong Li & Feng Ren & Qiang Wang, 2024. "China–US scientific collaboration on sustainable development amidst geopolitical tensions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Maximilian Scheu & Andreas Kuckertz, 2023. "Explorers of the twenty-first century? A systematic literature review of the scholarship on international entrepreneurs from developed economies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 177-235, March.
    20. MaruÅ¡a Premru & Matej ÄŒerne & SaÅ¡a BatistiÄ, 2022. "The Road to the Future: A Multi-Technique Bibliometric Review and Development Projections of the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8013-:d:437823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.