IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7499-d428371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Positive Affect and Beyond: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Peñalver

    (Department of Education, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, 21, 46002 Valencia, Spain)

  • Marisa Salanova

    (WANT Research Team, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain)

  • Isabel M. Martínez

    (WANT Research Team, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain)

Abstract

Group positive affect is defined as homogeneous positive affect among group members that emerges when working together. Considering that previous research has shown a significant relationship between group positive affect and a wide variety of group outcomes (e.g., behaviors, wellbeing, and performance), it is crucial to boost our knowledge about this construct in the work context. The main purpose is to review empirical research, to synthesize the findings and to provide research agenda about group positive affect, in order to better understand this construct. Through the PsycNET and Proquest Central databases, an integrative review was conducted to identify articles about group positive affect published between January 1990 and March 2019. A total of 44 articles were included and analyzed. Finding suggests that scholars have been more interested in understanding the outcomes of group positive affect and how to improve the productivity of groups than in knowing what the antecedents are. A summary conclusion is that group positive affect is related to leadership, job demands, job resources, diversity/similarity, group processes, and contextual factors, all of which influence the development of several outcomes and different types of wellbeing at the individual and group levels. However, with specific combinations of other conditions (e.g., group trust, negative affect, and interaction), high levels of group positive affect could cause harmful results. Conclusions shed light on group positive affect research and practice and might help Human Resources professionals to initiate empirically-based strategies related to recruitment, group design and leadership training.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Peñalver & Marisa Salanova & Isabel M. Martínez, 2020. "Group Positive Affect and Beyond: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7499-:d:428371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José M. Peiró & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Isabel Rodríguez-Molina & Núria Tordera, 2019. "The Happy-Productive Worker Model and Beyond: Patterns of Wellbeing and Performance at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Lin, Chia-Wu & Lin, Chiou-Shiu & Huang, Pei-Chi & Wang, You-Liang, 2014. "How group efficacy mediates the relationship between group affect and identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1388-1394.
    3. M. Esther García-Buades & José M. Peiró & María Isabel Montañez-Juan & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín, 2019. "Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the ‘Happy-Productive Worker Thesis’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-39, December.
    4. Tang, Chaoying & Naumann, Stefanie E., 2016. "Team diversity, mood, and team creativity: The role of team knowledge sharing in Chinese R & D teams," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 420-434, May.
    5. Sy, Thomas & Choi, Jin Nam, 2013. "Contagious leaders and followers: Exploring multi-stage mood contagion in a leader activation and member propagation (LAMP) model," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 127-140.
    6. Andrew P. Knight, 2015. "Mood at the Midpoint: Affect and Change in Exploratory Search Over Time in Teams That Face a Deadline," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 99-118, February.
    7. Mihee Kim & Yuhyung Shin, 2015. "Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 693-716, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Esther García-Buades & José M. Peiró & María Isabel Montañez-Juan & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín, 2019. "Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the ‘Happy-Productive Worker Thesis’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-39, December.
    2. Ying Chen & Xiaohu Zhou & Kim Klyver, 2019. "Collective Efficacy: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 587-603, October.
    3. Jean-Sébastien Boudrias & Francesco Montani & Christian Vandenberghe, 2021. "How and When Does Psychological Wellbeing Contribute to Proactive Performance? The Role of Social Resources and Job Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Nuria Gamero & Baltasar González-Anta & Virginia Orengo & Ana Zornoza & Vicente Peñarroja, 2021. "Is Team Emotional Composition Essential for Virtual Team Members’ Well-Being? The Role of a Team Emotional Management Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Ka Po Wong & Fion Choi Hung Lee & Pei-Lee Teh & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2021. "The Interplay of Socioecological Determinants of Work–Life Balance, Subjective Wellbeing and Employee Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Kellyann Berube Kowalski & Alex Aruldoss & Bhuvaneswari Gurumurthy & Satyanarayana Parayitam, 2022. "Work-From-Home Productivity and Job Satisfaction: A Double-Layered Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Lu Wang & Lorna Doucet & Mary Waller & Karin Sanders & Sybil Phillips, 2016. "A Laughing Matter: Patterns of Laughter and the Effectiveness of Working Dyads," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1142-1160, October.
    8. Zixiang Ma & Lirong Long & Yong Zhang & Junwei Zhang & Catherine K. Lam, 2017. "Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? The mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 565-586, September.
    9. Chiah, Mardy & Zhong, Angel, 2021. "Tuesday Blues and the day-of-the-week effect in stock returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Jiang, Kan & Mo, Silan & Qin, Meilian, 2024. "Descriptive or injunctive? The effect of sustainable normative appeals and advertising orientations on environmentally responsible consumption behavior in a collective action perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Kapo Wong & Siushing Man & Alan H. S. Chan, 2022. "Subjective Wellbeing and Work Performance among Teachers in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Autonomy Support Moderate Their Relationship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Felisa Latorre & Amalia Raquel Pérez-Nebra & Fabiana Queiroga & Carlos-María Alcover, 2021. "How Do Teleworkers and Organizations Manage the COVID-19 Crisis in Brazil? The Role of Flexibility I-Deals and Work Recovery in Maintaining Sustainable Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Yang, Inju & Kelly, Aidan, 2016. "The positive outcomes of ‘Socially Sharing Negative Emotions’ in workteams: A conceptual exploration," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 172-181.
    14. Ye, Qingyan & Wang, Duanxu & Guo, Weixiao, 2019. "Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 468-480.
    15. Kihyun Lee & Yeon Joo Chae & Inyong Shin, 2016. "Motivational antecedents of leader-member exchange differentiation: Evidence from South Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 87-112, March.
    16. Charlotta Sirén & Vivianna Fang He & Henrik Wesemann & Zoe Jonassen & Dietmar Grichnik & Georg von Krogh, 2020. "Leader Emergence in Nascent Venture Teams: The Critical Roles of Individual Emotion Regulation and Team Emotions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 931-961, July.
    17. Chieh-Peng Lin & Kuang-Jung Chen & Chu-Mei Liu & Chiu-Hui Liao, 2019. "Assessing decision quality and team performance: perspectives of knowledge internalization and resource adequacy," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 377-396, April.
    18. Tim Vantilborgh & Jemima Bidee & Roland Pepermans & Yannick Griep & Joeri Hofmans, 2016. "Antecedents of Psychological Contract Breach: The Role of Job Demands, Job Resources, and Affect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Ju Eun Hong & Miok Kim, 2020. "Effects of a Psychological Management Program on Subjective Happiness, Anger Control Ability, and Gratitude among Late Adolescent Males in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7499-:d:428371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.