IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i7p1455-d157209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Envy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Moderation Role of Leadership in Public and Private Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Pilar González-Navarro

    (Research Institute of Personnel Psychology, Organizational Development and Quality of Working Life (IDOCAL), University of Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain)

  • Rosario Zurriaga-Llorens

    (Research Institute of Personnel Psychology, Organizational Development and Quality of Working Life (IDOCAL), University of Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain)

  • Adekunle Tosin Olateju

    (Department of Psychology, College of Science, University of Canterbury, Canterbury 8041, New Zealand)

  • Lucía I. Llinares-Insa

    (Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain)

Abstract

Envy is a frequent emotion in work contexts where there is strong competition for resources and the leader is the person who manages them. When employees feel envy, they are likely to use counterproductive work behaviors (CWB), but the use of these behaviors may differ depending on the organization’s ownership. The goal of this study is to develop and test a model for the moderating role of Leader Member Exchange (LMX) in the relationship between envy and CWB in public and private organizations. The study design was cross-sectional. Data were collected from 225 Spanish employees in public and private organizations and analyzed using Path Analysis techniques. Results showed that envy was positively related to CWB, and that LMX was a significant moderator in the relationship between envy and CWB in public organizations, but not in private ones. However, this relationship is positive with high LMX, but less than in subjects with low LMX. Findings provide empirical support for the hypothesized conceptual model. This study is one of the first to explore LMX as a moderator of the relationship between envy and CWB. Thus, this study adds value to previous social exchange studies on LMX by integrating emotion research into the context of an exchange-based relationship. Our findings lead to several practical implications for creating healthy organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilar González-Navarro & Rosario Zurriaga-Llorens & Adekunle Tosin Olateju & Lucía I. Llinares-Insa, 2018. "Envy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Moderation Role of Leadership in Public and Private Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1455-:d:157209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Jiménez & Anita Bregenzer & K. Wolfgang Kallus & Bianca Fruhwirth & Verena Wagner-Hartl, 2017. "Enhancing Resources at the Workplace with Health-Promoting Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Christine (Mihaescu) Demeter & Ana-Claudia Tapardel, 2013. "Public And Private Leadership And Performance Management," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 17(1), pages 162-167, May.
    3. Charles R. Schwenk, 1990. "Conflict in Organizational Decision Making: An Exploratory Study of Its Effects in For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 436-448, April.
    4. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Schaubroeck, John & Lam, Simon S. K., 2004. "Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotees," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 33-47, May.
    6. Ulrika Widman, 2016. "Exploring the Role of Public–Private Partnerships in Forest Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Marco Ferroni & Paul Castle, 2011. "Public-Private Partnerships and Sustainable Agricultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-10, July.
    8. Soo Kim & Dong-Il Jung & Jung Lee, 2013. "Service employees’ deviant behaviors and leader–member exchange in contexts of dispositional envy and dispositional jealousy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 583-602, December.
    9. Shiying Shi & Heap-Yih Chong & Lihong Liu & Xiaosu Ye, 2016. "Examining the Interrelationship among Critical Success Factors of Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omnia Abdelazeem Hilal, 2023. "The Role of Organizational Stress in the Relationship Between Leader–Member Exchange and Workplace Envy," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 372-386, September.
    2. Pilar González-Navarro & Elena Talavera-Escribano & Rosario Zurriaga-Lloréns & Lucía I. Llinares-Insa, 2019. "Culture, Work, and Subjective Well-Being: The Role of LMX and Resilience in Spanish and Chinese Cultures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Zubair Akram & Yan Li & Umair Akram, 2019. "When Employees are Emotionally Exhausted Due to Abusive Supervision. A Conservation-of-Resources Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Miaomiao Li & Xiaofeng Xu & Ho Kwong Kwan, 2023. "The antecedents and consequences of workplace envy: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 1-35, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bergstén, Sabina & Stjernström, Olof & Pettersson, Örjan, 2018. "Experiences and emotions among private forest owners versus public interests: Why ownership matters," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 801-811.
    2. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Su, Xijiang, 2021. "Peer-level analyst transitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Tiéfigué Pierrette Coulibaly & Jianguo Du & Daniel Diakité & Olivier Joseph Abban & Elvis Kouakou, 2021. "A Proposed Conceptual Framework on the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The Role of Network Contact Frequency and Institutional Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Lee, Minsoo & Han, Xuehui & Quising, Pilipinas & Villaruel, Mai Lin, 2018. "Hazard Analysis on Public–Private Partnership Projects in Developing Asia," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 548, Asian Development Bank.
    5. Agarwal, Vernika & Malhotra, Snigdha & Dagar, Vishal & M. R, Pavithra, 2023. "Coping with public-private partnership issues: A path forward to sustainable agriculture," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Reich, Taly & Fulmer, Alexander G. & Dhar, Ravi, 2022. "In the face of self-threat: Why ambivalence heightens people’s willingness to act," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Yongwoon Cha & Jonghyeob Kim & Chang-taek Hyun & Sangwon Han, 2018. "Development of a Program Definition Rating Index for the Performance Prediction of Construction Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Ying Xue & Xiyuan Li & Hongmei Wang & Qiu Zhang, 2020. "How Employee’s Leadership Potential Leads to Leadership Ostracism Behavior: The Mediating Role of Envy, and the Moderating Role of Political Skills," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Chimhowu, Admos, 2013. "Aid for Agriculture and Rural Development: A Changing Landscape with New Players and Challenges," WIDER Working Paper Series 014, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Fetta, A.G. & Harper, P.R. & Knight, V.A. & Vieira, I.T. & Williams, J.E., 2012. "On the Peter Principle: An agent based investigation into the consequential effects of social networks and behavioural factors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(9), pages 2898-2910.
    11. De Clercq, Dirk & Haq, Inam Ul & Azeem, Muhammad Umer, 2018. "The roles of informational unfairness and political climate in the relationship between dispositional envy and job performance in Pakistani organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 117-126.
    12. Basant, Rakesh & Sharma, Shruti, 2014. "ICT Adoption and Organizational Change in Public and Private Enterprises," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-01-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    13. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Huei-Ting Tsai & Chung-Lin Tsai, 2022. "The influence of the five cardinal values of confucianism on firm performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 429-458, February.
    15. Oksana Lazor & Oleh Lazor & Nataliia Lutska & Ivan Krykhovetskyi & Kateryna Maistrenko & Agnes Olkova-Mykhnytska, 2022. "Formation and Implementation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in the Agricultural Sector," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 266-274, 10-2022.
    16. Owusu Victor Kwarteng & Gregar Ales & Ntsiful Alex, 2021. "Organizational diversity and competency-based performance: The mediating role of employee commitment and job satisfaction," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 352-369, December.
    17. Yurun Ge & Lucas Bottcher & Tom Chou & Maria R. D'Orsogna, 2024. "A knapsack for collective decision-making," Papers 2409.13236, arXiv.org.
    18. Bongjin Kim & Mark M. Suazo & John E. Prescott, 2008. "Exploring the Cognitive Nature of Boards of Directors and Its Implication for Board Effectiveness," Working Papers 0032, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    19. Rose, Gregory M. & Shoham, Aviv, 2004. "Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with international channels of distribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 942-950, September.
    20. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1455-:d:157209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.