IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i6p1130-d216465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Optimization of Boil-Off Gas Generation for Different Time Limits in Liquid Natural Gas Bunkering

Author

Listed:
  • Yude Shao

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Korea)

  • Yoonhyeok Lee

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Korea)

  • Hokeun Kang

    (Division of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Korea)

Abstract

This study focus on the optimal time limit of ship-to-ship (STS) liquid natural gas (LNG) bunkering by dynamic simulation. Based on this, a mathematical model for calculating the boil-off gas (BOG) amount was developed. With respect to the modeling of the study, the diameter of the bunkering line is set as 8 inch while that of the BOG return pipeline is set as 4 inch to satisfy the pressure of the receiving ship and BOG generation. The capacities of the cargo tank and fuel tank for bunkering and receiving ships are set as 4538 m 3 and 700 m 3 , respectively. The results indicated that the BOG amount with different LNG bunkering time limit is variable. The BOG flow rate varies inversely with respect to the bunkering time limit after 20 min. Additionally, it is necessary to control the bunkering time within 120 min since additional BOG is generated when the capacity of the pump exceeds 100,000 kg/h, and thus the tank pressure difference between bunkering and receiving ship may be reduced. It is believed that the results of the research could provide feasible assistance for STS LNG bunkering for the ports, and could give a specific guideline for the amount of the BOG generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yude Shao & Yoonhyeok Lee & Hokeun Kang, 2019. "Dynamic Optimization of Boil-Off Gas Generation for Different Time Limits in Liquid Natural Gas Bunkering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1130-:d:216465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurle, Yogesh M. & Wang, Sujing & Xu, Qiang, 2015. "Simulation study on boil-off gas minimization and recovery strategies at LNG exporting terminals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 628-641.
    2. Siyuan Wang & Theo Notteboom, 2014. "The Adoption of Liquefied Natural Gas as a Ship Fuel: A Systematic Review of Perspectives and Challenges," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 749-774, November.
    3. Yan, G. & Gu, Y., 2010. "Effect of parameters on performance of LNG-FPSO offloading system in offshore associated gas fields," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3393-3400, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thiaucourt, Jonas & Marty, Pierre & Hetet, Jean-François & Robert, Pascal & Delaire, Etienne, 2019. "A zonal non-equilibrium approach to model temperature gradients during ventless bottom filling of pressurized cryotanks for natural gas-powered ships," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Golrokh Sani, Ahmad & Najafi, Hamidreza & Azimi, Seyedeh Shakiba, 2022. "Dynamic thermal modeling of the refrigerated liquified CO2 tanker in carbon capture, utilization, and storage chain: A truck transport case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Young-Gyu Lee & Jong-Kwan Kim & Chang-Hee Lee, 2021. "Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis for Industrial Application of LNG Bunkering: A Comparison of Japan and South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd Shariq Khan & Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Wahid Ali & Aref Wazwaz & Khursheed B. Ansari & Moonyong Lee, 2020. "Energy Saving through Efficient BOG Prediction and Impact of Static Boil-off-Rate in Full Containment-Type LNG Storage Tank," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Querol, E. & Gonzalez-Regueral, B. & García-Torrent, J. & Ramos, Alberto, 2011. "Available power generation cycles to be coupled with the liquid natural gas (LNG) vaporization process in a Spanish LNG terminal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2382-2390, July.
    3. Akoh Fabien Yao & Maxime Sèbe & Laura Recuero Virto & Abdelhak Nassiri & Hervé Dumez, 2024. "The effect of LNG bunkering on port competitiveness using multilevel data analysis [L'effet du soutage par GNL sur la compétitivité des ports à l'aide de l'analyse de données à plusieurs niveaux]," Post-Print hal-04611804, HAL.
    4. Duan, Zhongdi & Ren, Tao & Ding, Guoliang & Chen, Jie & Mi, Xiaoguang, 2017. "Liquid-migration based model for predicting the thermal performance of spiral wound heat exchanger for floating LNG," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 972-982.
    5. Mofid, Hossein & Jazayeri-Rad, Hooshang & Shahbazian, Mehdi & Fetanat, Abdolvahhab, 2019. "Enhancing the performance of a parallel nitrogen expansion liquefaction process (NELP) using the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 286-303.
    6. Bian, Jiang & Yang, Jian & Liu, Yang & Li, Yuxing & Cao, Xuewen, 2022. "Analysis and efficiency enhancement for energy-saving re-liquefaction processes of boil-off gas without external refrigeration cycle on LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    7. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    8. Theo Notteboom & Larissa van der Lugt & Niels van Saase & Steve Sel & Kris Neyens, 2020. "The Role of Seaports in Green Supply Chain Management: Initiatives, Attitudes, and Perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Wang, Cheng & Ju, Yonglin & Fu, Yunzhun, 2021. "Dynamic modeling and analysis of LNG fuel tank pressurization under marine conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Duan, Zhongdi & Wang, Jianhu & Yuan, Yuchao & Tang, Wenyong & Xue, Hongxiang, 2023. "Near-wall thermal regulation for cryogenic storage by adsorbent coating: Modelling and pore-scale investigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    11. Tan, Roy & Duru, Okan & Thepsithar, Prapisala, 2020. "Assessment of relative fuel cost for dual fuel marine engines along major Asian container shipping routes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Al Baroudi, Hisham & Awoyomi, Adeola & Patchigolla, Kumar & Jonnalagadda, Kranthi & Anthony, E.J., 2021. "A review of large-scale CO2 shipping and marine emissions management for carbon capture, utilisation and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    13. Zineb Bouabidi & Fares Almomani & Easa I. Al-musleh & Mary A. Katebah & Mohamed M. Hussein & Abdur Rahman Shazed & Iftekhar A. Karimi & Hassan Alfadala, 2021. "Study on Boil-off Gas (BOG) Minimization and Recovery Strategies from Actual Baseload LNG Export Terminal: Towards Sustainable LNG Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Tang, Changlong & Hu, Fan & Zhou, Xiaoguang & Li, Yajun, 2022. "Optimization methods for flexibility and stability related to the operation of LNG receiving terminals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    15. Wang, Shuaian & Qi, Jingwen & Laporte, Gilbert, 2022. "Governmental subsidy plan modeling and optimization for liquefied natural gas as fuel for maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 304-321.
    16. Jiawei Ge & Mo Zhu & Mei Sha & Theo Notteboom & Wenming Shi & Xuefeng Wang, 2021. "Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 587-614, December.
    17. Kwak, Dong-Hun & Heo, Jeong-Ho & Park, Seung-Ha & Seo, Seok-Jang & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2018. "Energy-efficient design and optimization of boil-off gas (BOG) re-liquefaction process for liquefied natural gas (LNG)-fuelled ship," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 915-929.
    18. Olga Sideri & Michalis Papoutsidakis & Theodore Lilas & Nikitas Nikitakos & Dimitrios Papachristos, 2021. "Green shipping onboard: acceptance, diffusion & adoption of LNG and electricity as alternative fuels in Greece," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    19. Zhongyun Yue & John Mangan, 2024. "A framework for understanding reliability in container shipping networks," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(3), pages 523-544, September.
    20. Achilleas Tsantis & John Mangan & Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin, 2023. "Container shipping: a systematic literature review of themes and factors that influence the establishment of direct connections between countries," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 667-697, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1130-:d:216465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.