IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i6p1072-d215525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Method Based on Thermal Response Tests for Determining Effective Thermal Conductivity and Borehole Resistivity for Borehole Heat Exchangers

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Sapińska-Sliwa

    (Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Department of Drilling and Geoengineering, Laboratory of Geoenergetics, AGH University of Science and Technology (AGH UST), al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marc A. Rosen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

  • Andrzej Gonet

    (Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Department of Drilling and Geoengineering, Laboratory of Geoenergetics, AGH University of Science and Technology (AGH UST), al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Joanna Kowalczyk

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Al. Rejtana 16c, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Tomasz Sliwa

    (Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Department of Drilling and Geoengineering, Laboratory of Geoenergetics, AGH University of Science and Technology (AGH UST), al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Research on borehole heat exchangers is described on the development of a method for the determination, based on thermal response tests, of the effective thermal conductivity and the thermal resistivity for borehole heat exchangers. This advance is important, because underground thermal energy storage increasingly consists of systems with a large number of borehole heat exchangers, and their effective thermal conductivities and thermal resistivities are significant parameters in the performance of the system (whether it contains a single borehole or a field of boreholes). Borehole thermal energy storages provide a particularly beneficial method for using ground energy as a clean thermal energy supply. This benefit is especially relevant in cities with significant smog in winter. Here, the authors describe, in detail, the development of a formula that is a basis for the thermal response test that is derived from Fourier’s Law, utilizing a new way of describing the basic parameters of the thermal response test, i.e., the effective thermal conductivity and the thermal resistivity. The new method is based on the resistivity equation, for which a solution giving a linear regression with zero directional coefficient is found. Experimental tests were performed and analyzed in support of the theory, with an emphasis on the interpretation differences that stem from the scope of the test.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Sapińska-Sliwa & Marc A. Rosen & Andrzej Gonet & Joanna Kowalczyk & Tomasz Sliwa, 2019. "A New Method Based on Thermal Response Tests for Determining Effective Thermal Conductivity and Borehole Resistivity for Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1072-:d:215525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beier, Richard A. & Acuña, José & Mogensen, Palne & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Borehole resistance and vertical temperature profiles in coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 665-675.
    2. Jin Luo & Joachim Rohn & Manfred Bayer & Anna Priess, 2013. "Thermal Efficiency Comparison of Borehole Heat Exchangers with Different Drillhole Diameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Sliwa, Tomasz & Kotyza, Jaroslaw, 2003. "Application of existing wells as ground heat source for heat pumps in Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-2), pages 3-8, January.
    4. Eslami-nejad, Parham & Bernier, Michel, 2012. "Freezing of geothermal borehole surroundings: A numerical and experimental assessment with applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 333-345.
    5. Lee, Chulho & Park, Moonseo & Nguyen, The-Bao & Sohn, Byonghu & Choi, Jong Min & Choi, Hangseok, 2012. "Performance evaluation of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers by conducting in-situ thermal response tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 77-83.
    6. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng & Du, Yaxing, 2014. "A p(t)-linear average method to estimate the thermal parameters of the borehole heat exchangers for in situ thermal response test," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 211-221.
    7. Wang, Deqi & Lu, Lin & Zhang, Wenke & Cui, Ping, 2015. "Numerical and analytical analysis of groundwater influence on the pile geothermal heat exchanger with cast-in spiral coils," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 705-714.
    8. Borja Badenes & Miguel Ángel Mateo Pla & Lenin G. Lemus-Zúñiga & Begoña Sáiz Mauleón & Javier F. Urchueguía, 2017. "On the Influence of Operational and Control Parameters in Thermal Response Testing of Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Choi, Wonjun & Ooka, Ryozo, 2015. "Interpretation of disturbed data in thermal response tests using the infinite line source model and numerical parameter estimation method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 476-488.
    10. Tomasz Sliwa & Marc A. Rosen, 2015. "Natural and Artificial Methods for Regeneration of Heat Resources for Borehole Heat Exchangers to Enhance the Sustainability of Underground Thermal Storages: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Angelo Zarrella & Giuseppe Emmi & Samantha Graci & Michele De Carli & Matteo Cultrera & Giorgia Dalla Santa & Antonio Galgaro & David Bertermann & Johannes Müller & Luc Pockelé & Giulia Mezzasalma & D, 2017. "Thermal Response Testing Results of Different Types of Borehole Heat Exchangers: An Analysis and Comparison of Interpretation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Zarrella, Angelo & De Carli, Michele, 2013. "Heat transfer analysis of short helical borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1477-1491.
    13. Witte, Henk J.L., 2013. "Error analysis of thermal response tests," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 302-311.
    14. Fan, Rui & Jiang, Yiqiang & Yao, Yang & Shiming, Deng & Ma, Zuiliang, 2007. "A study on the performance of a geothermal heat exchanger under coupled heat conduction and groundwater advection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2199-2209.
    15. Acuña, José & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 312-320.
    16. Li, Min & Lai, Alvin C.K., 2012. "Heat-source solutions to heat conduction in anisotropic media with application to pile and borehole ground heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 451-458.
    17. Zarrella, Angelo & Capozza, Antonio & De Carli, Michele, 2013. "Analysis of short helical and double U-tube borehole heat exchangers: A simulation-based comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 358-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Tomasz Wysogląd & Tomasz Kowalski & Izabela Konopka, 2021. "Strength Tests of Hardened Cement Slurries for Energy Piles, with the Addition of Graphite and Graphene, in Terms of Increasing the Heat Transfer Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Wołoszyn, Jerzy, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis of borehole thermal energy storage efficiency for seventeen material, design and operating parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 545-559.
    4. Francesco Calise & Maria Vicidomini & Mário Costa & Qiuwang Wang & Poul Alberg Østergaard & Neven Duić, 2019. "Toward an Efficient and Sustainable Use of Energy in Industries and Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Abdelazim Abbas Ahmed & Mohsen Assadi & Adib Kalantar & Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa, 2022. "A Critical Review on the Use of Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems for Heating and Cooling Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Tomasz Sliwa & Kinga Jarosz & Marc A. Rosen & Anna Sojczyńska & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Karolina Fąfera & Tomasz Kowalski & Martyna Ciepielowska, 2020. "Influence of Rotation Speed and Air Pressure on the Down the Hole Drilling Velocity for Borehole Heat Exchanger Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Tomasz Sliwa & Kazimierz Twardowski & Krzysztof Szymski & Andrzej Gonet & Paweł Żuk, 2020. "Method of Averaging the Effective Thermal Conductivity Based on Thermal Response Tests of Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    2. Hans Schwarz & Borja Badenes & Jan Wagner & José Manuel Cuevas & Javier Urchueguía & David Bertermann, 2021. "A Case Study of Thermal Evolution in the Vicinity of Geothermal Probes Following a Distributed TRT Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Choi, Wonjun & Ooka, Ryozo, 2016. "Effect of disturbance on thermal response test, part 1: Development of disturbance analytical model, parametric study, and sensitivity analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 306-318.
    4. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Assessment of Ground Regeneration around Borehole Heat Exchangers between Heating Seasons in Cold Climates: A Case Study in Bialystok (NE, Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Carotenuto, Alberto & Ciccolella, Michela & Massarotti, Nicola & Mauro, Alessandro, 2016. "Models for thermo-fluid dynamic phenomena in low enthalpy geothermal energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 330-355.
    6. Pasquier, Philippe, 2018. "Interpretation of the first hours of a thermal response test using the time derivative of the temperature," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 56-75.
    7. Aydın, Murat & Sisman, Altug, 2015. "Experimental and computational investigation of multi U-tube boreholes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 163-171.
    8. Zhang, Donghai & Gao, Penghui & Zhou, Yang & Wang, Yijiang & Zhou, Guoqing, 2020. "An experimental and numerical investigation on temperature profile of underground soil in the process of heat storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-21.
    9. Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Tomasz Sliwa & Kazimierz Twardowski & Krzysztof Szymski & Andrzej Gonet & Paweł Żuk, 2020. "Method of Averaging the Effective Thermal Conductivity Based on Thermal Response Tests of Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Han, Chanjuan & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of a vertical geothermal heat pump system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 148-160.
    11. Raymond, Jasmin & Lamarche, Louis & Malo, Michel, 2015. "Field demonstration of a first thermal response test with a low power source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 30-39.
    12. Tomasz Sliwa & Kinga Jarosz & Marc A. Rosen & Anna Sojczyńska & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Karolina Fąfera & Tomasz Kowalski & Martyna Ciepielowska, 2020. "Influence of Rotation Speed and Air Pressure on the Down the Hole Drilling Velocity for Borehole Heat Exchanger Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    14. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    15. Zhou, Yang & Zheng, Zhi-xiang & Zhao, Guang-si, 2022. "Analytical models for heat transfer around a single ground heat exchanger in the presence of both horizontal and vertical groundwater flow considering a convective boundary condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Peng Li & Peng Guan & Jun Zheng & Bin Dou & Hong Tian & Xinsheng Duan & Hejuan Liu, 2020. "Field Test and Numerical Simulation on Heat Transfer Performance of Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Determination of the Selected Wells Operational Power with Borehole Heat Exchangers Operating in Real Conditions, Based on Experimental Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Jia, Jie & Lee, W.L. & Cheng, Yuanda, 2019. "Field demonstration of a first constant-temperature thermal response test with both heat injection and extraction for ground source heat pump systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 79-86.
    19. Pasquier, Philippe & Marcotte, Denis, 2020. "Robust identification of volumetric heat capacity and analysis of thermal response tests by Bayesian inference with correlated residuals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Zhao, Zilong & Lin, Yu-Feng & Stumpf, Andrew & Wang, Xinlei, 2022. "Assessing impacts of groundwater on geothermal heat exchangers: A review of methodology and modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 121-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1072-:d:215525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.