IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v145y2015icp163-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and computational investigation of multi U-tube boreholes

Author

Listed:
  • Aydın, Murat
  • Sisman, Altug

Abstract

In ground source heat pump (GSHP) applications, borehole drilling cost constitutes an important part of the investment cost and it can be reduced by improving borehole performance. In vertical GSHP applications, usually double-U tube configurations are used to improve the heat transfer rate per unit length of a borehole, (unit HTR value). To determine the optimal number of U-tubes which maximizes the commercial and engineering benefits of multi U-tube applications, cost and performance analyses of multi U-tube boreholes are crucial. In this study, a triple U-tube is used in a borehole of 50m depth. Time variation of unit HTR value of the borehole is experimentally measured when single, double and triple U-tubes are in operation separately. Furthermore a computational model is calibrated by fitting the computational results to the experimental ones, and effects of using four and five U-tubes in a borehole are computationally investigated. The relations between number of U tubes and time variation of unit HTR value of a borehole as well as investment cost are analyzed. Long term borehole performance predictions are made and compared for multi U-tube applications. Both experimental and computational results showed that performance improvements are remarkable for 2U-tube and 3U-tube configurations while it is nearly insignificant for 4U and 5U ones. If the investment cost per thermal power is considered, 2U-tube configuration is the optimal one if the prices of polyethylene pipes are relatively high, like in Turkey. When the cost of pipes decreases, then 3U-tube or even 4U–tube configuration can be the cheapest solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Aydın, Murat & Sisman, Altug, 2015. "Experimental and computational investigation of multi U-tube boreholes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 163-171.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:145:y:2015:i:c:p:163-171
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915002135
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beier, Richard A. & Acuña, José & Mogensen, Palne & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Borehole resistance and vertical temperature profiles in coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 665-675.
    2. Wang, Huajun & Qi, Chengying & Du, Hongpu & Gu, Jihao, 2010. "Improved method and case study of thermal response test for borehole heat exchangers of ground source heat pump system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 727-733.
    3. Zarrella, Angelo & De Carli, Michele, 2013. "Heat transfer analysis of short helical borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1477-1491.
    4. Choi, Jong Min & Park, Yongjung & Kang, Shin-Hyung, 2013. "Heating performance verification of a ground source heat pump system with U-tube and double tube type GLHEs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 32-39.
    5. Park, Hyunku & Lee, Seung-Rae & Yoon, Seok & Choi, Jung-Chan, 2013. "Evaluation of thermal response and performance of PHC energy pile: Field experiments and numerical simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 12-24.
    6. Acuña, José & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 312-320.
    7. Zanchini, E. & Lazzari, S. & Priarone, A., 2010. "Improving the thermal performance of coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 657-666.
    8. Florides, Georgios A. & Christodoulides, Paul & Pouloupatis, Panayiotis, 2013. "Single and double U-tube ground heat exchangers in multiple-layer substrates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 364-373.
    9. Yang, H. & Cui, P. & Fang, Z., 2010. "Vertical-borehole ground-coupled heat pumps: A review of models and systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 16-27, January.
    10. Zarrella, Angelo & Capozza, Antonio & De Carli, Michele, 2013. "Analysis of short helical and double U-tube borehole heat exchangers: A simulation-based comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 358-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Jin & Zhang, Qi & Liang, Changming & Wang, Haiqi & Ma, Xinning, 2023. "An overview of the recent development of the Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 269-279.
    2. Zhang, Guozhu & Cao, Ziming & Xiao, Suguang & Guo, Yimu & Li, Chenglin, 2022. "A promising technology of cold energy storage using phase change materials to cool tunnels with geothermal hazards," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Law, Ying Lam E. & Dworkin, Seth B., 2016. "Characterization of the effects of borehole configuration and interference with long term ground temperature modelling of ground source heat pumps," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1032-1047.
    4. Kordas, Olga & Nikiforovich, Eugene, 2019. "A phenomenological theory of steady-state vertical geothermal systems: A novel approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 23-35.
    5. Gultekin, Ahmet & Aydin, Murat & Sisman, Altug, 2019. "Effects of arrangement geometry and number of boreholes on thermal interaction coefficient of multi-borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 163-170.
    6. Shah, Sheikh Khaleduzzaman & Aye, Lu & Rismanchi, Behzad, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation of a seasonal solar thermal energy storage system for space heating in cold climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    7. Angelo Zarrella & Giuseppe Emmi & Samantha Graci & Michele De Carli & Matteo Cultrera & Giorgia Dalla Santa & Antonio Galgaro & David Bertermann & Johannes Müller & Luc Pockelé & Giulia Mezzasalma & D, 2017. "Thermal Response Testing Results of Different Types of Borehole Heat Exchangers: An Analysis and Comparison of Interpretation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Sihan Zhou & Lijie Zhu & Runan Wan & Tao Zhang & Yongzheng Zhang & Yi Zhan & Fang Wang & Linfeng Zhang & Tian You, 2023. "An Overview of Sandbox Experiment on Ground Heat Exchangers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-39, July.
    9. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    10. Fadejev, Jevgeni & Simson, Raimo & Kurnitski, Jarek & Haghighat, Fariborz, 2017. "A review on energy piles design, sizing and modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 390-407.
    11. Dehghan B, Babak, 2018. "Thermal conductivity determination of ground by new modified two dimensional analytical models: Study cases," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 393-401.
    12. Shah, Sheikh Khaleduzzaman & Aye, Lu & Rismanchi, Behzad, 2018. "Seasonal thermal energy storage system for cold climate zones: A review of recent developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-49.
    13. Shah, Sheikh Khaleduzzaman & Aye, Lu & Rismanchi, Behzad, 2022. "Validations of a double U-tube borehole model and a seasonal solar thermal energy storage system model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 462-485.
    14. Tomasz Sliwa & Tomasz Kowalski & Dominik Cekus & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa, 2021. "Research on Fresh and Hardened Sealing Slurries with the Addition of Magnesium Regarding Thermal Conductivity for Energy Piles and Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Dehghan B., Babak & Kukrer, Ergin, 2017. "A new 1D analytical model for investigating the long term heat transfer rate of a borehole ground heat exchanger by Green's function method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 615-621.
    16. Andrea Ferrantelli & Jevgeni Fadejev & Jarek Kurnitski, 2019. "Energy Pile Field Simulation in Large Buildings: Validation of Surface Boundary Assumptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Pandey, Navdeep & Murugesan, K. & Thomas, H.R., 2017. "Optimization of ground heat exchangers for space heating and cooling applications using Taguchi method and utility concept," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 421-438.
    18. Davide Menegazzo & Giulia Lombardo & Sergio Bobbo & Michele De Carli & Laura Fedele, 2022. "State of the Art, Perspective and Obstacles of Ground-Source Heat Pump Technology in the European Building Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    2. Aneta Sapińska-Sliwa & Marc A. Rosen & Andrzej Gonet & Joanna Kowalczyk & Tomasz Sliwa, 2019. "A New Method Based on Thermal Response Tests for Determining Effective Thermal Conductivity and Borehole Resistivity for Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    4. Cristina Sáez Blázquez & Arturo Farfán Martín & Ignacio Martín Nieto & Pedro Carrasco García & Luis Santiago Sánchez Pérez & Diego González-Aguilera, 2017. "Efficiency Analysis of the Main Components of a Vertical Closed-Loop System in a Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    6. Carotenuto, Alberto & Ciccolella, Michela & Massarotti, Nicola & Mauro, Alessandro, 2016. "Models for thermo-fluid dynamic phenomena in low enthalpy geothermal energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 330-355.
    7. Ana Vieira & Maria Alberdi-Pagola & Paul Christodoulides & Saqib Javed & Fleur Loveridge & Frederic Nguyen & Francesco Cecinato & João Maranha & Georgios Florides & Iulia Prodan & Gust Van Lysebetten , 2017. "Characterisation of Ground Thermal and Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour for Shallow Geothermal Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-51, December.
    8. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng & Du, Yaxing, 2014. "A p(t)-linear average method to estimate the thermal parameters of the borehole heat exchangers for in situ thermal response test," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 211-221.
    9. Beier, Richard A. & Spitler, Jeffrey D., 2016. "Weighted average of inlet and outlet temperatures in borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 118-129.
    10. Sorranat Ratchawang & Srilert Chotpantarat & Sasimook Chokchai & Isao Takashima & Youhei Uchida & Punya Charusiri, 2022. "A Review of Ground Source Heat Pump Application for Space Cooling in Southeast Asia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Changlong Wang & Qiang Fu & Han Fang & Jinli Lu, 2022. "Estimation of Ground Thermal Properties of Shallow Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger Using an Improved Parameter Estimation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Farzaneh-Gord, Mahmood & Ghezelbash, Reza & Sadi, Meisam & Moghadam, Ali Jabari, 2016. "Integration of vertical ground-coupled heat pump into a conventional natural gas pressure drop station: Energy, economic and CO2 emission assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 998-1014.
    13. Cui, Yuanlong & Zhu, Jie & Twaha, Ssennoga & Riffat, Saffa, 2018. "A comprehensive review on 2D and 3D models of vertical ground heat exchangers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 84-114.
    14. Raymond, Jasmin & Lamarche, Louis & Malo, Michel, 2015. "Field demonstration of a first thermal response test with a low power source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 30-39.
    15. Wilke, Sascha & Menberg, Kathrin & Steger, Hagen & Blum, Philipp, 2020. "Advanced thermal response tests: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Shah, Sheikh Khaleduzzaman & Aye, Lu & Rismanchi, Behzad, 2018. "Seasonal thermal energy storage system for cold climate zones: A review of recent developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-49.
    17. Peng Li & Peng Guan & Jun Zheng & Bin Dou & Hong Tian & Xinsheng Duan & Hejuan Liu, 2020. "Field Test and Numerical Simulation on Heat Transfer Performance of Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Jinli Xie & Yinghong Qin, 2021. "Heat Transfer and Bearing Characteristics of Energy Piles: Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Acuña, José & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 312-320.
    20. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Wang, Gaosheng & McLennan, John & Forbes, Bryan & Li, Xiaojiang & Li, Jiacheng, 2019. "Study on wellbore fluid flow and heat transfer of a multilateral-well CO2 enhanced geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 14-27.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:145:y:2015:i:c:p:163-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.