IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v114y2017icp88-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An alternative derivation of the stationary distribution of the multivariate neutral Wright–Fisher model for low mutation rates with a view to mutation rate estimation from site frequency data

Author

Listed:
  • Schrempf, Dominik
  • Hobolth, Asger

Abstract

Recently, Burden and Tang (2016) provided an analytical expression for the stationary distribution of the multivariate neutral Wright–Fisher model with low mutation rates. In this paper we present a simple, alternative derivation that illustrates the approximation. Our proof is based on the discrete multivariate boundary mutation model which has three key ingredients. First, the decoupled Moran model is used to describe genetic drift. Second, low mutation rates are assumed by limiting mutations to monomorphic states. Third, the mutation rate matrix is separated into a time-reversible part and a flux part, as suggested by Burden and Tang (2016). An application of our result to data from several great apes reveals that the assumption of stationarity may be inadequate or that other evolutionary forces like selection or biased gene conversion are acting. Furthermore we find that the model with a reversible mutation rate matrix provides a reasonably good fit to the data compared to the one with a non-reversible mutation rate matrix.

Suggested Citation

  • Schrempf, Dominik & Hobolth, Asger, 2017. "An alternative derivation of the stationary distribution of the multivariate neutral Wright–Fisher model for low mutation rates with a view to mutation rate estimation from site frequency data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 88-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:114:y:2017:i:c:p:88-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2016.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004058091630106X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2016.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vogl, Claus & Clemente, Florian, 2012. "The allele-frequency spectrum in a decoupled Moran model with mutation, drift, and directional selection, assuming small mutation rates," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 197-209.
    2. Burden, Conrad J. & Tang, Yurong, 2016. "An approximate stationary solution for multi-allele neutral diffusion with low mutation rates," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 22-32.
    3. Etheridge, A.M. & Griffiths, R.C., 2009. "A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 320-330.
    4. Vogl, Claus & Bergman, Juraj, 2015. "Inference of directional selection and mutation parameters assuming equilibrium," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 71-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vogl, Claus & Mikula, Lynette C. & Burden, Conrad J., 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimators for scaled mutation rates in an equilibrium mutation–drift model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 106-118.
    2. Burden, Conrad J. & Griffiths, Robert C., 2018. "Stationary distribution of a 2-island 2-allele Wright–Fisher diffusion model with slow mutation and migration rates," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-80.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vogl, Claus & Mikula, Lynette C. & Burden, Conrad J., 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimators for scaled mutation rates in an equilibrium mutation–drift model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 106-118.
    2. Mikula, Lynette Caitlin & Vogl, Claus, 2024. "The expected sample allele frequencies from populations of changing size via orthogonal polynomials," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 55-85.
    3. Burden, Conrad J. & Tang, Yurong, 2017. "Rate matrix estimation from site frequency data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 23-33.
    4. Vogl, Claus & Mikula, Lynette Caitlin, 2021. "A nearly-neutral biallelic Moran model with biased mutation and linear and quadratic selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-17.
    5. Vogl, Claus & Bergman, Juraj, 2015. "Inference of directional selection and mutation parameters assuming equilibrium," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 71-82.
    6. Malaguti, Giulia & Singh, Param Priya & Isambert, Hervé, 2014. "On the retention of gene duplicates prone to dominant deleterious mutations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 38-51.
    7. Jüri Lember & Chris Watkins, 2022. "An Evolutionary Model that Satisfies Detailed Balance," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-37, March.
    8. Burden, Conrad J. & Griffiths, Robert C., 2018. "Stationary distribution of a 2-island 2-allele Wright–Fisher diffusion model with slow mutation and migration rates," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-80.
    9. Vogl, Claus & Clemente, Florian, 2012. "The allele-frequency spectrum in a decoupled Moran model with mutation, drift, and directional selection, assuming small mutation rates," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 197-209.
    10. Desai, Michael M. & Nicolaisen, Lauren E. & Walczak, Aleksandra M. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2012. "The structure of allelic diversity in the presence of purifying selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 144-157.
    11. Frank Hollander & Shubhamoy Nandan, 2022. "Spatially Inhomogeneous Populations with Seed-Banks: I. Duality, Existence and Clustering," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1795-1841, September.
    12. Wenkai Huang & Feng Zhan, 2023. "A Novel Probabilistic Diffusion Model Based on the Weak Selection Mimicry Theory for the Generation of Hypnotic Songs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Vogl, Claus, 2014. "Estimating the scaled mutation rate and mutation bias with site frequency data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 19-27.
    14. Corujo, Josué, 2021. "Dynamics of a Fleming–Viot type particle system on the cycle graph," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 57-91.
    15. Der, Ricky & Epstein, Charles L. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2011. "Generalized population models and the nature of genetic drift," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 80-99.
    16. Griffiths, Robert C. & Jenkins, Paul A. & Lessard, Sabin, 2016. "A coalescent dual process for a Wright–Fisher diffusion with recombination and its application to haplotype partitioning," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 126-138.
    17. Griffiths, Robert C. & Jenkins, Paul A. & Spanò, Dario, 2018. "Wright–Fisher diffusion bridges," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 67-77.
    18. Etheridge, Alison M. & Griffiths, Robert C. & Taylor, Jesse E., 2010. "A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection, and the lambda coalescent limit," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 77-92.
    19. Xinkai Wu & Mengze Xu & Jian-Rong Yang & Jian Lu, 2024. "Genome-wide impact of codon usage bias on translation optimization in Drosophila melanogaster," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Lenz, Ute & Kluth, Sandra & Baake, Ellen & Wakolbinger, Anton, 2015. "Looking down in the ancestral selection graph: A probabilistic approach to the common ancestor type distribution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 27-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:114:y:2017:i:c:p:88-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.