IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v31y2014icp439-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of vacuum tube based solar cookers with the experimental determination of energy and exergy efficiencies of a single vacuum tube based prototype

Author

Listed:
  • Farooqui, Suhail Zaki

Abstract

Solar cookers may be generally classified into direct and indirect types. The direct types include the box type and parabolic type, while the indirect types include the vacuum tube based cookers. This paper reviews the gradual progress made in the second type. The energy and exergy analysis of a single vacuum tube based prototype has been carried out experimentally. Performance parameters indicate a high peak exergy power of 55.6W, while the temperature difference gap at half power is 38.75K and the quality factor is 0.042. The energy efficiency of the cooker is 20–30%, while the exergy efficiency is 4–6%. These results make this compact single family solar cooker comparable in performance to large community based Scheffer type solar cookers. Results have been compared to a number of other solar cooker types.

Suggested Citation

  • Farooqui, Suhail Zaki, 2014. "A review of vacuum tube based solar cookers with the experimental determination of energy and exergy efficiencies of a single vacuum tube based prototype," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 439-445.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:31:y:2014:i:c:p:439-445
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032113008241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farooqui, Suhail Zaki, 2014. "Prospects of renewables penetration in the energy mix of Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 693-700.
    2. Kumar, Naveen & Vishwanath, G. & Gupta, Anurag, 2012. "An exergy based unified test protocol for solar cookers of different geometries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 457-462.
    3. Muthusivagami, R.M. & Velraj, R. & Sethumadhavan, R., 2010. "Solar cookers with and without thermal storage--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 691-701, February.
    4. Panwar, N.L. & Kaushik, S.C. & Kothari, Surendra, 2012. "State of the art of solar cooking: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3776-3785.
    5. Pohekar, S.D. & Kumar, Dinesh & Ramachandran, M., 2005. "Dissemination of cooking energy alternatives in India--a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 379-393, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ashmore Mawire & Sibongiseni M. Simelane & Patrick O. Abedigamba, 2021. "Energetic and exergetic performance comparison of three solar cookers for developing countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14528-14555, October.
    2. Palanikumar, G. & Shanmugan, S. & Chithambaram, V. & Gorjian, Shiva & Pruncu, Catalin I. & Essa, F.A. & Kabeel, A.E. & Panchal, Hitesh & Janarthanan, B. & Ebadi, Hossein & Elsheikh, Ammar H. & Selvara, 2021. "Thermal investigation of a solar box-type cooker with nanocomposite phase change materials using flexible thermography," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 260-282.
    3. Hosseinzadeh, Mohammad & Sadeghirad, Reza & Zamani, Hosein & Kianifar, Ali & Mirzababaee, Seyyed Mahdi, 2021. "The performance improvement of an indirect solar cooker using multi-walled carbon nanotube-oil nanofluid: An experimental study with thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 14-24.
    4. Herez, Amal & Ramadan, Mohamad & Khaled, Mahmoud, 2018. "Review on solar cooker systems: Economic and environmental study for different Lebanese scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 421-432.
    5. Hosseinzadeh, Mohammad & Faezian, Ali & Mirzababaee, Seyyed Mahdi & Zamani, Hosein, 2020. "Parametric analysis and optimization of a portable evacuated tube solar cooker," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Aramesh, Mohamad & Ghalebani, Mehdi & Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Zamani, Hosein & Lorenzini, Giulio & Mahian, Omid & Wongwises, Somchai, 2019. "A review of recent advances in solar cooking technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 419-435.
    7. Kashyap, S. Rahul & Pramanik, Santanu & Ravikrishna, R.V., 2023. "A review of solar, electric and hybrid cookstoves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Farooqui, Suhail Zaki, 2015. "Impact of load variation on the energy and exergy efficiencies of a single vacuum tube based solar cooker," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 152-158.
    9. Selvaraj Balachandran & Jose Swaminathan, 2022. "Advances in Indoor Cooking Using Solar Energy with Phase Change Material Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-32, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farooqui, Suhail Zaki, 2015. "Impact of load variation on the energy and exergy efficiencies of a single vacuum tube based solar cooker," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 152-158.
    2. Indora, Sunil & Kandpal, Tara C., 2018. "Institutional cooking with solar energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 131-154.
    3. Khatri, Rahul & Goyal, Rahul & Sharma, Ravi Kumar, 2021. "Advances in the developments of solar cooker for sustainable development: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Aramesh, Mohamad & Ghalebani, Mehdi & Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Zamani, Hosein & Lorenzini, Giulio & Mahian, Omid & Wongwises, Somchai, 2019. "A review of recent advances in solar cooking technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 419-435.
    5. Regattieri, Alberto & Piana, Francesco & Bortolini, Marco & Gamberi, Mauro & Ferrari, Emilio, 2016. "Innovative portable solar cooker using the packaging waste of humanitarian supplies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 319-326.
    6. Herez, Amal & Ramadan, Mohamad & Khaled, Mahmoud, 2018. "Review on solar cooker systems: Economic and environmental study for different Lebanese scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 421-432.
    7. Vanschoenwinkel, Janka & Lizin, Sebastien & Swinnen, Gilbert & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven, 2014. "Solar cooking in Senegalese villages: An application of best–worst scaling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 447-458.
    8. Farooqui, Suhail Zaki, 2014. "Prospects of renewables penetration in the energy mix of Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 693-700.
    9. Park, S.R. & Pandey, A.K. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2014. "Energy and exergy analysis of typical renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 105-123.
    10. Cuce, Erdem & Cuce, Pinar Mert, 2013. "A comprehensive review on solar cookers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1399-1421.
    11. Lecuona, Antonio & Nogueira, José-Ignacio & Ventas, Rubén & Rodríguez-Hidalgo, María-del-Carmen & Legrand, Mathieu, 2013. "Solar cooker of the portable parabolic type incorporating heat storage based on PCM," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1136-1146.
    12. Mahavar, S. & Sengar, N. & Dashora, P., 2017. "Analytical model for electric back-up power estimation of solar box type cookers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 871-881.
    13. Nkhonjera, Lameck & Bello-Ochende, Tunde & John, Geoffrey & King’ondu, Cecil K., 2017. "A review of thermal energy storage designs, heat storage materials and cooking performance of solar cookers with heat storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 157-167.
    14. Jagadish, Arundhati & Dwivedi, Puneet & McEntire, Kira D. & Chandar, Mamta, 2019. "Agent-based modeling of “cleaner” cookstove adoption and woodfuel use: An integrative empirical approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Apaolaza-Pagoaga, Xabier & Carrillo-Andrés, Antonio & Rodrigues Ruivo, Celestino, 2022. "Experimental thermal performance evaluation of different configurations of Copenhagen solar cooker," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 604-618.
    16. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    17. Perwez, Usama & Sohail, Ahmed & Hassan, Syed Fahad & Zia, Usman, 2015. "The long-term forecast of Pakistan's electricity supply and demand: An application of long range energy alternatives planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2423-2435.
    18. Liu, Gang & Lucas, Mario & Shen, Lei, 2008. "Rural household energy consumption and its impacts on eco-environment in Tibet: Taking Taktse county as an example," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 1890-1908, September.
    19. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    20. Raza, Muhammad Amir & Khatri, Krishan Lal & Hussain, Arslan, 2022. "Transition from fossilized to defossilized energy system in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 19-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:31:y:2014:i:c:p:439-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.